Search results in the DIPF database of publications

Your query:

(Schlagwörter: "Interkulturelle Psychologie")

Integrating the emic (indigenous) with the etic (universal) A case of squaring the circle or for […] Eckensberger, Lutz H. Journal Article | In: Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior | 2015 35199 Endnote: Author(s): Eckensberger, Lutz H.
Title: Integrating the emic (indigenous) with the etic (universal) A case of squaring the circle or for adopting a culture inclusive action theory perspective
In: Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 45 (2015) 1, S. 108-140
DOI: 10.1111/jtsb.12057
Publication Type: 3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Language: Englisch
Keywords: Diskurs; Entwicklungspsychologie; Erkenntnistheorie; Ethik; Handlungstheorie; Individuum; Interkulturelle Psychologie; Kultur; Kulturpsychologie; Methode; Psychologie; Psychologische Forschung; Qualität; Theorie; Wissenschaftstheorie
Abstract: The dualism of emic and etic plays a crucial role in the emergence of three culturally informed approaches of psychology: cross-cultural psychology (CCP), cultural psychology (CP) and indigenous psychologies (IPs), a distinction largely accepted nowadays. Similarities and/or differences between these positions are usually discussed either on the level of phenomena (data) or theory. In this paper, however, the discussion takes place on a meta-theoretical or epistemological level, which is also emerging elsewhere. In following several earlier papers of the author, first, four perspectives are distinguished that underlie present day psychology. Second, these are used as a framework for linking them to the three "camps". This analysis will show that these perspectives are characterized by different underlying worldviews, interests as well as methodical preferences. Third, it is claimed that this level of discussion is quite fruitful for the ongoing discourse on the three camps, but also helps one to understand, why the duality between emic and etic approaches is - implicitly or explicitly - at the core of these discussions, because their relevance turns out to differ in the three camps. In that sense, the emic/etic duality is used here as a "litmus test" to exemplify these deeper differences between the camps, thereby highlighting them. Fourth, in order to overcome not only the dilemma between the unique and general in psychology, but also to clarify the relation between the individual and culture it is proposed that psychology should take human action as its unit of analysis, thereby connecting historically to the early beginnings of psychology at the end of the 19th century. It will be argued that a culture inclusive action theory may overcome this tension and may help to integrate western and other indigenous psychologies, and hence it could be advantageous to integrate CP and IPs as well. This is possible because the proposed theory hopefully provides a universal framework for psychological concepts, yet allows for their culture specific expression. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments: Bildung und Entwicklung

Culture inclusive action theory. Action theory in dialectics and dialectics in action theory Eckensberger, Lutz H. Book Chapter | Aus: Valsiner, Jaan (Hrsg.): Oxford handbook of culture and psychology | Oxford: Oxford University Press | 2012 32683 Endnote: Author(s): Eckensberger, Lutz H.
Title: Culture inclusive action theory. Action theory in dialectics and dialectics in action theory
In: Valsiner, Jaan (Hrsg.): Oxford handbook of culture and psychology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 , S. 357-402
Publication Type: 4. Beiträge in Sammelwerken; Lexika/Enzyklopädie o.ä.
Language: Englisch
Keywords: Affekt; Deutschland; Dialektik; Emotion; Empirische Untersuchung; Entwicklungspsychologie; Handlung; Handlungsforschung; Handlungstheorie; Individuum; Interkulturelle Psychologie; Kognition; Kohlberg; Lawrence; Kranker; Krebs <Med>; Kultur; Kulturelle Identität; Kulturpsychologie; Methode; Moral; Motiv <Psy>; Norm <Ethik>; Persönlichkeit; Philosophie; Piaget; Jean; Region; Saarland; Selbstreflexion; Sozialisation; Soziokulturelle Bedingungen; Systemtheorie; Theorie; Urteilsbildung; Verantwortung; Wert; Wertvorstellung
Abstract (english): The chapter deals with the concept of Culture-Inclusive Action Theory and research the author and his co-workers conducted primarily in Saarbrücken (and later in Frankfurt) over the last 35 years in two (complementary) subject areas, which also form the roots of the chapter: cross-cultural research and development of moral judgment in the tradition of Piaget/Kohlberg. In cross-cultural psychology, the duality "person versus culture" is unavoidable. In moral development, the dualities "content versus structure," "facts versus norms," and "affects versus cognition" are likewise unavoidable. In both research fields, the assumption of a dialectical relation between these dualities and the role of action theory in relation to dialectics was and still is attractive. In the following this role is interpreted also within Dynamic System Theory, by the concepts of upward emergence and downward selection, which are synthesized by the human action. This theoretical orientation from the very beginning called for its justification vìs-a-vìs mainstream psychology by implying meta-theoretical reflections. After a short introduction into dialectics and action theory in psychology, a more detailed treatment of the two research subjects are presented. The first step in both topics was (biographically) a systematic theoretical analysis dealing with the meaning of culture for psychology and the deep structure of moral development. In both topics the (descriptive) application of action theory and the (interpretative) appropriation of dialectics was productive and lead to contextualized research by conceptualizing a "regional cultural identity" on the one hand and formulating "types of everyday morality" on the other. This cultural contextualization is the reason for calling our approach Culture-Inclusive Action Theory. A later study on the process of coming to terms with cancer was based on the same theoretical model; developed in both fields (culture and morality), it was also methodically contextualized from the very beginnings.
DIPF-Departments: Bildung und Entwicklung

Cross-cultural differences as meaning systems Eckensberger, Lutz H. Book Chapter | Aus: Vijver, Fons J. R. van de;Chasiotis, Athanasios; Breugelmans, Seger M. (Hrsg.): Fundamental questions in cross-cultural psychology | Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Pr. | 2011 31967 Endnote: Author(s): Eckensberger, Lutz H.
Title: Cross-cultural differences as meaning systems
In: Vijver, Fons J. R. van de;Chasiotis, Athanasios; Breugelmans, Seger M. (Hrsg.): Fundamental questions in cross-cultural psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Pr., 2011 , S. 407-441
Publication Type: 4. Beiträge in Sammelwerken; Sammelband (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language: Englisch
Keywords: Biologie; Interkulturelle Psychologie; Interpretation; Kulturdifferenz; Kulturpsychologie; Mensch; Physik; Psychologie; Selbstreflexion; Soziologie; Verstehen; Wissenschaftsdisziplin
Abstract: Die Arbeit schließt an eine längere Diskussion über die Fruchtbarkeit, die Kuhn'schen Wissenschaftstheorie auch auf die Psychologie anzuwenden an. Wie bereits früher werden insgesamt vier Perspektiven/Paradigmen in der Psychologie unterschieden (die physikalisch/kausale, die biologisch/teleonomische, die kulturell/historisch symbolische und die teleologische/selbstreflexive Perspektive). Es wird argumentiert, dass diese Perspektiven inkommensurabel aber komplementär sind. Dann wird gezeigt, dass das Konzept der Bedeutung in engem Zusammenhang zum Kontext und zu Wahrheitskonzepten steht. Schließlich werden die Begriffe Bedeutung, Kontext und Wahrheit in ihrem je verschiedenen Verständnis und Zusammenhang durch die vier Perspektiven durchgespielt. Schließlich werden weiterführende Überlegungen vorgetragen, die letztlich darauf abzielen, die Splits zwischen den Perspektiven innerhalb der Psychologie zu überwinden.
DIPF-Departments: Bildung und Entwicklung

Morality from a Cultural Psychology perspective Eckensberger, Lutz H. Book Chapter | Aus: Zheng,Gang; Leung, Kwok; Adair, John G. (Hrsg.): Perspectives and progress in comtemporary cross-cultural psychology | Beijing: China Light Industry Pr. | 2007 7368 Endnote: Author(s): Eckensberger, Lutz H.
Title: Morality from a Cultural Psychology perspective
In: Zheng,Gang; Leung, Kwok; Adair, John G. (Hrsg.): Perspectives and progress in comtemporary cross-cultural psychology, Beijing: China Light Industry Pr., 2007 , S. 25-34
URL: https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/iaccp_papers/25/
Publication Type: 4. Beiträge in Sammelwerken; Sammelband (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language: Englisch
Keywords: Kulturpsychologie; Psychologie; Kultur; Interkultureller Vergleich; Interkulturelle Psychologie; Forschung; Moral; Entwicklung; Handlungstheorie
Abstract (english): The study of morality necessarily leads to a perspective that conceives of psychology primarily as a cultural science rather than a natural science. In the chapter the perspective of a cultural psychology is taken. Under this perspective, the relationship between culture and morality is intrinsic; culture cannot be defined or investigated without heeding morality, and morality can also not be understood without reference to the culture concept. Secondly, cultural rules complement natural laws in explaining and understanding human activities (behaviors, cognition, affects). Human action (not behaviour) is taken as the empirical and analytical unit for psychology. It serves as an analytical universal and methodically as tertium comparationis. The perspective is discussed by arguing for the centrality of agency, transcultural standards of duty and contextualization of research on moral development.(DIPF/Autor)
DIPF-Departments: Bildung und Kultur

Auswirkungen schulischer und ausserschulischer Erziehung auf die kognitive Entwicklung: Eine […] Bender-Szymanski, Dorothea; Hesse, Hermann-Günter Journal Article | In: Zeitschrift für erziehungs- und sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung | 1984 2456 Endnote: Author(s): Bender-Szymanski, Dorothea; Hesse, Hermann-Günter
Title: Auswirkungen schulischer und ausserschulischer Erziehung auf die kognitive Entwicklung: Eine Problematisierung aufgrund neuerer interkultureller psychologischer Forschung
In: Zeitschrift für erziehungs- und sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung, 1 (1984) 2, S. 343-370
URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-opus-16937
URL: https://www.pedocs.de/frontdoor.php?source_opus=1693
Publication Type: 3b. Beiträge in weiteren Zeitschriften; wissenschaftsorientiert
Language: Deutsch
Keywords: Kognitive Entwicklung; Verhaltensmuster; Einflussfaktor; Schulbildung; Schule; Erziehung; Pädagogik; Außerschulische Jugendbildung; Außerschulisches Lernen; Interkultureller Vergleich; Interkulturelle Forschung; Interkulturelle Psychologie; Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft; Pädagogische Psychologie; Entwicklungspsychologie; Kulturpsychologie; Psychologie; Schulpädagogik; Forschungsbericht; Forschungsstand; Deutschland
DIPF-Departments: Allgemeine und Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft