-
-
Autor*innen: Jäger-Dengler-Harles, Ingeborg; Heck, Tamara; Rittberger, Marc
Titel: Systematic reviews as object to study relevance assessment processes
Aus: University of Sheffield (Hrsg.): Proceedings of ISIC: The Information Behaviour Conference, Pretoria, South Africa, 28th September to 1st October, 2020, online: ISIC2020, 2021 (Information Research. Suppl., Vol. 25, No. 4), S. #25
DOI: 10.47989/irisic2024
URL: http://informationr.net/ir/25-4/isic2020/isic2024.html
Dokumenttyp: 4. Beiträge in Sammelbänden; Tagungsband/Konferenzbeitrag/Proceedings
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter: Qualitative Forschung; Qualitätskontrolle; Systematic Review; Entscheidung; Forschung; Entscheidungskriterium; Forschung; Forschungsergebnis; Informationsverhalten; Forscher; Einflussfaktor
Abstract (english): Introduction. Systematic reviews are a method to synthesise research results for evidence-based decision-making on a specific question. Processes of information seeking and behaviour play a crucial role and might intensively influence the outcomes of a review. This paper proposes an approach to understand the relevance assessment and decision-making of researchers that conduct systematic reviews.
Method. A systematic review was conducted to build up a database for text-based qualitative analyses of researchers' decision-making in review processes.
Analysis. The analysis focuses on the selection process of retrieved articles and introduces the method to investigate relevance assessment processes of researchers.
Results. There are different methods to conduct reviews in research, and relevance assessment of documents within those processes is neither one-directional nor standardised. Research on information behaviour of researchers involved in those reviews has not looked at relevance assessment steps and their influence in a review's outcomes.
Conclusions. A reason for the varieties and inconsistencies of review types might be that information seeking and relevance assessment are much more complex and researchers might not be able to draw upon their concrete decisions. This paper proposes a research study to investigate researcher behaviour while synthesising research results for evidence-based decision-making.
DIPF-Abteilung: Informationszentrum Bildung