Ergebnis der Suche in der DIPF Publikationendatenbank

Ihre Abfrage:

(Schlagwörter: "Interkultureller Vergleich")

Conceptualising teaching quality into six domains for the study Bell, Courtney A.; Klieme, Eckhard; Praetorius, Anna-Katharina Sammelbandbeitrag | Aus: OECD (Hrsg.): Global teaching insights technical report | Paris: OECD Publishing | 2021 42206 Endnote: Autor*innen: Bell, Courtney A.; Klieme, Eckhard; Praetorius, Anna-Katharina
Titel: Conceptualising teaching quality into six domains for the study
Aus: OECD (Hrsg.): Global teaching insights technical report, Paris: OECD Publishing, 2021 , S. 1-24
URL: https://www.oecd.org/education/school/GTI-TechReport-Chapter2.pdf
Dokumenttyp: 4. Beiträge in Sammelbänden; Sammelband (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter: Unterricht; Qualität; Definition; Konzeptualisierung; Systematic Review; Internationaler Vergleich; Interkultureller Vergleich; Chile; China; Deutschland; Großbritannien; Japan; Kolumbien; Madrid; Mexiko; Schanghai; Spanien
Abstract: Der Beitrag beschreibt die theoretischen Grundlagen der Erfassung von Unterrichtsqualität in der TALIS-Videostudie. (DIPF/Autor)
Abstract (english): The chapter describes the theoretical foundations of measuring teaching quality in the TALIS Video Study. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung: Lehr und Lernqualität in Bildungseinrichtungen

Curriculum mapping Klieme, Eckhard Sammelbandbeitrag | Aus: OECD (Hrsg.): Global teaching insights technical report | Paris: OECD Publishing | 2021 42207 Endnote: Autor*innen: Klieme, Eckhard
Titel: Curriculum mapping
Aus: OECD (Hrsg.): Global teaching insights technical report, Paris: OECD Publishing, 2021 , S. 1-11
URL: https://www.oecd.org/education/school/GTI-TechReport-Chapter3.pdf
Dokumenttyp: 4. Beiträge in Sammelbänden; Sammelband (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter: Mathematikunterricht; Quadratische Gleichung; Curriculum; Analyse; Curriculumvergleich; Vergleich; Interkultureller Vergleich; Chile; China; Deutschland; Großbritannien; Japan; Kolumbien; Madrid; Mexiko; Schanghai; Spanien
Abstract: Der Beitrag beschreibt die international vergleichende Curriculumanalyse, die zur Festlegung der Unterrichtseinheit "Quadratische Gleichungen" als Fokus der TALIS Video Studie geführt hat. (DIPF/Autor)
Abstract (english): The chapter describes the cross-national curriculum analysis which lead to the definition of "Quadratic Equations" as the focal unit covered in the TALIS Video Study. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung: Lehr und Lernqualität in Bildungseinrichtungen

The structure of teaching practices across countries. A combination of factor analysis and network […] Fischer, Jessica; He, Jia; Klieme, Eckhard Zeitschriftenbeitrag | In: Studies in Educational Evaluation | 2020 39910 Endnote: Autor*innen: Fischer, Jessica; He, Jia; Klieme, Eckhard
Titel: The structure of teaching practices across countries. A combination of factor analysis and network analysis
In: Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65 (2020) , S. 100861
DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100861
URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-203522
URL: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-203522
Dokumenttyp: 3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter: Unterrichtspraxis; Schülerleistung; Leistungsbewertung; Faktorenanalyse; Netzwerkanalyse; Datenanalyse; Sekundäranalyse; PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; Internationaler Vergleich; Interkultureller Vergleich
Abstract (english): Teaching practices are pivotal for student learning. Due to pedagogical traditions and national cultures, the structure of teaching practices may differ across countries. This study investigates the structure of teaching practices across 12 countries grouped into four major linguistic/cultural clusters. First, factor analysis is applied to investigate if the theoretical distinction between teacher-directed and student-centred practices is generalizable across countries. Then, network analysis is used to explore how individual classroom assessment practices relate to either teacher-directed or student-centred practices. Main findings include that: (1) teacher-directed and student-centred practices are two distinct factors across countries; (2) the overall structure and connectivity of teaching practices differs across countries, with smaller differences within linguistic/cultural clusters; and (3) assessment practices with the aim to structure and guide learning strongly relate to teacher-directed practices, whereas assessment practices with the aim to individualize instruction more relate to student-centred practices. We discuss the global patterning and implications.
DIPF-Abteilung: Bildungsqualität und Evaluation

Cross-cultural comparability and validity of metacognitive knowledge in reading in PISA 2009. A […] Zhou, Ji; He, Jia; Lafontaine, Dominique Zeitschriftenbeitrag | In: Assessment in Education | 2020 40612 Endnote: Autor*innen: Zhou, Ji; He, Jia; Lafontaine, Dominique
Titel: Cross-cultural comparability and validity of metacognitive knowledge in reading in PISA 2009. A comparison of two scoring methods
In: Assessment in Education, 27 (2020) 6, S. 635-654
DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2020.1828820
URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-221384
URL: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-221384
Dokumenttyp: 3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter: Metakognition; Wissen; Messung; Lesen; PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; Interkultureller Vergleich; Datenanalyse; Sekundäranalyse; Validität; Vergleich; Likert-Skala; OECD-Länder
Abstract: Accurate measurement of metacognitive knowledge in reading is important. Different instruments and scoring methods have been proposed but not systematically compared for their measurement comparability across cultures and validity. Given student data from 34 OECD countries in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) in 2009, we compared two scoring methods for metacognitive knowledge in reading based on pair-wise comparisons of strategies and with conventional Likert-scale responses of selected items. Metacognitive knowledge scored with conventional Likert-scale responses demonstrated higher cross-cultural comparability than the pair-wise comparison method. Linked with reading competence, motivation and control strategy in reading, scores from the two scoring methods showed differential criterion validity, possibly related to the types of tasks (understanding and remembering versus summarising), item content (complexity and discrimination between preferred strategies in reading) and common method variance (e.g., individuals' stable response style in rating scales). Theoretical and methodological implications are discussed. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung: Bildungsqualität und Evaluation

Ein Blick auf Unterrichtsmaterialien. Das Potenzial zur kognitiven Aktivierung Herbert, Benjamin Sammelbandbeitrag | Aus: Grünkorn, Juliane; Klieme, Eckhard; Praetorius, Anna-Katharina; Schreyer, Patrick (Hrsg.): Mathematikunterricht im internationalen Vergleich: Ergebnisse aus der TALIS-Videostudie Deutschland | Frankfurt am Main: DIPF | Leibniz‐Institut für Bildungsforschung und Bildungsinformation | 2020 40812 Endnote: Autor*innen: Herbert, Benjamin
Titel: Ein Blick auf Unterrichtsmaterialien. Das Potenzial zur kognitiven Aktivierung
Aus: Grünkorn, Juliane; Klieme, Eckhard; Praetorius, Anna-Katharina; Schreyer, Patrick (Hrsg.): Mathematikunterricht im internationalen Vergleich: Ergebnisse aus der TALIS-Videostudie Deutschland, Frankfurt am Main: DIPF | Leibniz‐Institut für Bildungsforschung und Bildungsinformation, 2020 , S. 27-30
URL: https://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2020/21072/pdf/Gruenkorn_Klieme_Praetorius_Schreyer_2020_Mathematikunterricht_im_internationalen_Vergleich_TALIS-Videostudie_A.pdf#page=30
Dokumenttyp: 4. Beiträge in Sammelbänden; Sammelband (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache: Deutsch
Schlagwörter: Deutschland; Mathematikunterricht; Quadratische Gleichung; Videoaufzeichnung; Unterrichtsbeobachtung; Forschungsprojekt; Unterrichtsmaterial; Unterricht; Nutzung; Kognitives Lernen; Aktivierung; Didaktischer Ansatz; Interkultureller Vergleich; Internationaler Vergleich;
Abstract: In der TALIS-Videostudie Deutschland wurden die Unterrichtsmaterialien aus 188 Unterrichtsstunden zum Thema Quadratische Gleichungen erfasst. Dies hatte unter anderem zum Ziel, einen Einblick zu erhalten, wie oft verschiedene Materialtypen für den Einsatz im Unterricht von Lehrkräften erstellt und/oder ausgewählt wurden. Ausgehend von der Auswertung dieser und weiterer Indikatoren wurde ein Messinstrument für das Potenzial einer Unterrichtsstunde zur kognitiven Aktivierung entwickelt (Herbert & Schweig, in Vorb.).
DIPF-Abteilung: Bildungsqualität und Evaluation

The impact of linguistic similarity on cross-cultural comparability of students' perceptions of […] Fischer, Jessica; Praetorius, Anna-Katharina; Klieme, Eckhard Zeitschriftenbeitrag | In: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability | 2019 39120 Endnote: Autor*innen: Fischer, Jessica; Praetorius, Anna-Katharina; Klieme, Eckhard
Titel: The impact of linguistic similarity on cross-cultural comparability of students' perceptions of teaching quality
In: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 31 (2019) 2, S. 201-220
DOI: 10.1007/s11092-019-09295-7
URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-190654
URL: http://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-190654
Dokumenttyp: 3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter: PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; Unterricht; Qualität; Messung; Schüler; Wahrnehmung; Daten; Interkultureller Vergleich; Klassenführung; Kognitives Lernen; Sprache; Einflussfaktor; Messverfahren; Kulturdifferenz; Sprachproblem; Frage; Antwort; Testauswertung; Validität; Reliabilität; Vergleichende Bildungsforschung; Macau; Schanghai; Taipei; England; Schottland; Irland; Frankreich; Belgien; Schweiz; Österreich; Deutschland; Mexiko; Kolumbien
Abstract (english): Valid cross-country comparisons of student learning and pivotal factors contributing to it, such as teaching quality, offer the possibility to learn from outstandingly effective educational systems across the world and to improve learning in classrooms by providing policy relevant information. Yet, it often remains unclear whether the instruments used in international large-scale assessments work similarly across different cultural and linguistic groups, and thus can be used for comparing them. Using PISA 2012 data, we investigated data comparability of three teaching quality dimensions, namely student support, classroom management, and cognitive activation using a newly developed psychometric approach, namely alignment. Focusing on 15 countries, grouped into five linguistic clusters, we secondly assessed the impact of linguistic similarity on data comparability. Main findings include that (1) comparability of teaching quality measures is limited when comparing linguistically diverse countries; (2) the level of comparability varies across dimensions; (3) linguistic similarity considerably enhances the degree of comparability, except across the Chinese-speaking countries. Our study illustrates new and more flexible possibilities to test for data comparability and outlines the importance to consider cultural and linguistic differences when comparing teaching-related measures across groups. We discuss possible sources of lacking data comparability and implications for comparative educational research. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung: Bildungsqualität und Evaluation

On detecting systematic measurement error in cross-cultural research. A review and critical […] Boer, Diana; Hanke, Katja; He, Jia Zeitschriftenbeitrag | In: Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology | 2018 39221 Endnote: Autor*innen: Boer, Diana; Hanke, Katja; He, Jia
Titel: On detecting systematic measurement error in cross-cultural research. A review and critical reflection on equivalence and invariance tests
In: Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49 (2018) 5, S. 713-734
DOI: 10.1177/0022022117749042
URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0022022117749042
Dokumenttyp: 3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter: Interkultureller Vergleich; Empirische Forschung; Messverfahren; Psychologische Forschung; Fehler; Kultureinfluss; Einflussfaktor; Kognition; Verhalten; Sprache; Validität; Taxonomie
Abstract: One major threat to revealing cultural influences on psychological states or processes is the presence of bias (i.e., systematic measurement error). When quantitative measures are not targeting the same construct or they differ in metric across cultures, the validity of inferences about cultural variability (and universality) is in doubt. The objectives of this article are to review what can be done about it and what is being done about it. To date, a multitude of useful techniques and methods to reduce or assess bias in cross-cultural research have been developed. We explore the limits of invariance/equivalence testing and suggest more flexible means of dealing with bias. First, we review currently available established and novel methods that reveal bias in cross-cultural research. Second, we analyze current practices in a systematic content analysis. The content analysis of more than 500 culture-comparative quantitative studies (published from 2008 to 2015 in three outlets in cross-cultural, social, and developmental psychology) aims to gauge current practices and approaches in the assessment of measurement equivalence/invariance. Surprisingly, the analysis revealed a rather low penetration of invariance testing in cross-cultural research. Although a multitude of classical and novel approaches for invariance testing is available, these are employed infrequent rather than habitual. We discuss reasons for this hesitation, and we derive suggestions for creatively assessing and handling biases across different research paradigms and designs. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung: Bildungsqualität und Evaluation

An indigenous measure of social desirability across non-western countries Domínguez-Espinosa, Alejandra del Carmen; He, Jia; Rosabal-Coto, Mariano; Harb, Camelia; […] Sammelbandbeitrag | Aus: Karasawa, Minoru; Yuki, Masaki; Ishii, Keiko; Uchida, Yukiko; Sato, Kosuke; Friedlmeier, Wolfgang (Hrsg.): Venture into cross-cultural psychology: Proceedings from the 23rd Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology (IACCP), July 30th - August 3rd, 2016, Nagoya, Japan | Allendale; MI: Grand Valley State University | 2018 39224 Endnote: Autor*innen: Domínguez-Espinosa, Alejandra del Carmen; He, Jia; Rosabal-Coto, Mariano; Harb, Camelia; Baena, Isabel Benitez; Acosta, Tania; Estrada, Catalina; Barrios, Carolina; Vijver, Fons J. R. van de; Matus, Pedro Wolfgang Velasco
Titel: An indigenous measure of social desirability across non-western countries
Aus: Karasawa, Minoru; Yuki, Masaki; Ishii, Keiko; Uchida, Yukiko; Sato, Kosuke; Friedlmeier, Wolfgang (Hrsg.): Venture into cross-cultural psychology: Proceedings from the 23rd Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology (IACCP), July 30th - August 3rd, 2016, Nagoya, Japan, Allendale; MI: Grand Valley State University, 2018 , S. #1
URL: https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/iaccp_papers/154/
Dokumenttyp: 4. Beiträge in Sammelbänden; Tagungsband/Konferenzbeitrag/Proceedings
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter: Nicaragua; Persönlichkeit; Persönlichkeitsmerkmal; Soziales Verhalten; Altruismus; Liebe; Selbstdarstellung; Lüge; Charakter; Messverfahren; Psychometrie; Interkultureller Vergleich; Argentinien; Kolumbien; Mexiko; Spanien; China; Costa Rica; Libanon
Abstract: Cross-cultural differences in Social Desirability (SD) could be partly due to the nonequivalence of constructs, items, or other challenges of cross-cultural research. We tested to what extent a Mexican, indigenous scale of SD, capturing both positive and negative features of SD, would be useful in other countries. Data were collected in convenience samples in eight countries (Argentina, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Lebanon, Mexico, Nicaragua, and Spain) in order to test the psychometric accuracy and invariance of the factor structure. Values of Tucker's factor congruence coefficients (gauging invariance) and tests of the similarity of the cross-country similarity of Cronbach's alpha (gauging internal consistency) revealed that SD, as measured by this indigenous list, is stable and comparable across cultures. The results are interpreted in a conceptual framework in which SD is viewed as a culturally embedded communication style that people use to integrate successfully into their groups. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung: Bildungsqualität und Evaluation

Unterrichtsforschung Vieluf, Svenja; Göbel, Kerstin; Sauerwein, Markus Sammelbandbeitrag | Aus: Gogolin, Ingrid; Georgi, Viola B.; Krüger-Potratz, Marianne; Lengyel, Dorit; Sandfuchs, Uwe (Hrsg.): Handbuch interkulturelle Pädagogik | Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt | 2018 38198 Endnote: Autor*innen: Vieluf, Svenja; Göbel, Kerstin; Sauerwein, Markus
Titel: Unterrichtsforschung
Aus: Gogolin, Ingrid; Georgi, Viola B.; Krüger-Potratz, Marianne; Lengyel, Dorit; Sandfuchs, Uwe (Hrsg.): Handbuch interkulturelle Pädagogik, Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt, 2018 , S. 216-218
Dokumenttyp: 4. Beiträge in Sammelwerken; Sammelband (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache: Deutsch
Schlagwörter: Qualität; Unterrichtsforschung; Interkulturalität; Interkulturelle Pädagogik; Interkultureller Vergleich; DESI <Deutsch-Englisch-Schülerleistungen-International>; Begriff; Definition; Mehrsprachigkeit; Textverständnis; Leseverstehen; Unterrichtsbeobachtung
DIPF-Abteilung: Bildungsqualität und Evaluation

Linking extreme response style to response processes. A cross-cultural mixed methods approach Benitez, Isabel; He, Jia; van de Vijver, Fons J. R.; Padilla, José-Luis Zeitschriftenbeitrag | In: International Journal of Psychology | 2016 36604 Endnote: Autor*innen: Benitez, Isabel; He, Jia; van de Vijver, Fons J. R.; Padilla, José-Luis
Titel: Linking extreme response style to response processes. A cross-cultural mixed methods approach
In: International Journal of Psychology, 51 (2016) 6, S. 464-473
DOI: 10.1002/ijop.12379
Dokumenttyp: 3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter: Antwort; Interkultureller Vergleich; Internationaler Vergleich; Interview; Kognitionspsychologie; Niederlande; Qualitative Forschung; Quantitative Forschung; Spanien; Verhalten; Verstehen
Abstract: The aim of this study is to contribute to a better understanding of extreme response style in cross-cultural research by integrating quantitative and qualitative evidence in a mixed methods design. In the quantitative phase, indexes of extreme response style, derived from quality of life measures from different international studies, were compared between Spain and the Netherlands. Results indicated that extreme responding was more common among Spanish than among Dutch in endorsement of items, but that the opposite was found for frequency scales including never as a response anchor. In the qualitative phase, cognitive interviews were conducted with 25 participants in each country. The integration of quantitative results and qualitative findings suggests that country differences in extreme response style may stem from various sources, including the more independent evaluation of each item by Dutch, the stronger connotations of never for Spanish and stronger emotions triggered by specific topics such as work satisfaction that was more strongly associated with insecurity for Spanish. It is concluded that the integration of quantitative and qualitative evidence can help to understand cross-cultural similarities and differences in extreme response style. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung: Bildungsqualität und Evaluation