-
-
Autor*innen: Wachsmuth, Henning; Naderi, Nona; Habernal, Ivan; Hou, Yufang; Hirst, Graeme; Gurevych, Iryna; Stein, Benno
Titel: Argumentation quality assessment. Theory vs. practice
Aus: Association for Computational Linguistics (Hrsg.): The 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2017): Proceedings of the conference, vol. 2 (short papers), July 30 - August 4, 2017. Vancouver, Canada, Stroudsburg; PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017 , S. 250-255
DOI: 10.18653/v1/P17-2039
URL: https://aclanthology.info/pdf/P/P17/P17-2039.pdf
Dokumenttyp: 4. Beiträge in Sammelbänden; Tagungsband/Konferenzbeitrag/Proceedings
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter: Computerlinguistik; Argumentation; Diskussion; Qualität; Bewertung; Theorie; Praxis; Vergleich
Abstract: Argumentation quality is viewed differently in argumentation theory and in practical assessment approaches. This paper studies to what extent the views match empirically. We find that most observations on quality phrased spontaneously are in fact adequately represented by theory. Even more, relative comparisons of arguments in practice correlate with absolute quality ratings based on theory. Our results clarify how the two views can learn from each other. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung: Informationszentrum Bildung