Menü Überspringen
Contact
Deutsch
English
Not track
Data Protection
Search
Log in
DIPF News
Research
Infrastructures
Institute
Zurück
Contact
Deutsch
English
Not track
Data Protection
Search
Home
>
Research
>
Publications
>
Publications Data Base
Search results in the DIPF database of publications
Your query:
(Schlagwörter: "OECD-Länder")
Advanced Search
Search term
Only Open Access
Search
Unselect matches
Select all matches
Export
52
items matching your search terms.
Show all details
Lesekompetenz in PISA 2018 - Ergebnisse in einer digitalen Welt
Weis, Mirjam; Doroganova, Anastasia; Hahnel, Carolin; Becker-Mrotzek, Michael; Lindauer, Thomas; […]
Book Chapter
| Aus: Reiss, Kristina; Weis, Mirjam; Klieme, Eckhard; Köller, Olaf (Hrsg.): PISA 2018: Grundbildung im internationalen Vergleich | Münster: Waxmann | 2019
39684 Endnote
Author(s):
Weis, Mirjam; Doroganova, Anastasia; Hahnel, Carolin; Becker-Mrotzek, Michael; Lindauer, Thomas; Artelt, Cordula; Reiss, Kristina
Title:
Lesekompetenz in PISA 2018 - Ergebnisse in einer digitalen Welt
In:
Reiss, Kristina; Weis, Mirjam; Klieme, Eckhard; Köller, Olaf (Hrsg.): PISA 2018: Grundbildung im internationalen Vergleich, Münster: Waxmann, 2019 , S. 47-80
URL:
https://www.pisa.tum.de/fileadmin/w00bgi/www/Berichtsbaende_und_Zusammenfassungungen/PISA_2018_Berichtsband_online_29.11.pdf#page=47
Publication Type:
4. Beiträge in Sammelwerken; Sonstiges
Language:
Deutsch
Keywords:
Lesekompetenz; PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; Schülerleistung; Leistungsmessung; Digitale Medien; Leseverhalten; Veränderung; Text; Textverständnis; Information; Bewertung; Bildungsmonitoring; Geschlechtsspezifischer Unterschied; Mädchen; Junge; Schulform; Unterschied; Leistungssteigerung; Gymnasiast; Internationaler Vergleich; Deutschland; OECD-Länder
Abstract:
Die mittlere Lesekompetenz der Fünfzehnjährigen in Deutschland liegt bei der PISA-Studie 2018 signifikant über dem OECD-Durchschnitt. Der Mittelwert der Lesekompetenz der Fünfzehnjährigen in Deutschland unterscheidet sich 2018 nicht signifikant von den deutschen Durchschnittswerten bei den PISA-Studien 2009 und 2015, ist aber deutlich höher als bei PISA 2000. Die Gruppe der besonders leseschwachen Schülerinnen und Schüler ist im Vergleich zu anderen lesestarken Staaten verhältnismäßig groß und entspricht in etwa dem OECD-Durchschnitt. Die Gruppe der besonders lesestarken Jugendlichen ist in Deutschland hingegen signifikant großer als im Durchschnitt der OECD-Staaten. Die differenzierten Analysen zeigen, dass ein relativ hoher Anteil der Gymnasiastinnen und Gymnasiasten bei PISA 2018 hochkompetent im Lesen ist und diese Gruppe seit PISA 2009 deutlich gewachsen ist. Allerdings gibt es insbesondere an nicht gymnasialen Schularten einen hohen Anteil leseschwacher Jugendlicher, der sowohl im Vergleich zu 2009 als auch im Vergleich zu 2015 bedeutsam angestiegen ist. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Analysis using TALIS 2018 scale scores
Rozman, Mojca; Wild, Justin; Stancel Piątak, Agnes
Working Papers
| 2019
39714 Endnote
Author(s):
Rozman, Mojca; Wild, Justin; Stancel Piątak, Agnes
Title:
Analysis using TALIS 2018 scale scores
Published:
Paris: OECD, 2019 (OECD (Hrsg.): TALIS 2018 and TALIS Starting Strong 2018 user guide)
URL:
www.oecd.org/education/talis/TALIS_2018-TALIS_Starting_Strong_2018_User_Guide.pdf#page=130
Publication Type:
5. Arbeits- und Diskussionspapiere; Forschungsbericht/Projektberichte/Schulrückmeldungen
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Skala; Evaluation; Skalenkonstruktion; Analyse; Beispiel; Internationaler Vergleich; OECD-Länder
Abstract:
This chapter provides a brief summary on scale evaluation and scale score contruction in the OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 and the OECD Starting Strong Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS Starting Strong) 2018. In addition, it provides an example of how to read the results from scale evaluation and also offers two examples of analyses with scale scores. The first one demonstrates comparisons of scale scores between participating countries/economies within one ISCED level and the second one describes scale score comparison within one country between different ISCED levels. The results from statistical analysis using the scale scores should be interpreted taking into account the limitations based on the level of measurement invariance achieved by each scale. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Validation of scales and construction of scale scores
Stancel-Piątak, Agnes; Wild, Justin; Chen, Minge; Rozman, Mojca; Mirazchiyski, Plamen; Cigler, Hynek
Working Papers
| 2019
39715 Endnote
Author(s):
Stancel-Piątak, Agnes; Wild, Justin; Chen, Minge; Rozman, Mojca; Mirazchiyski, Plamen; Cigler, Hynek
Title:
Validation of scales and construction of scale scores
Published:
Paris: OECD, 2019 (OECD (Hrsg.): TALIS 2018 technical report)
URL:
https://www.oecd.org/education/talis/TALIS_2018_Technical_Report.pdf#page=192
Publication Type:
5. Arbeits- und Diskussionspapiere; Forschungsbericht/Projektberichte/Schulrückmeldungen
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Skala; Evaluation; Index; Skalenkonstruktion; Internationaler Vergleich; OECD-Länder
Abstract:
To enable reporting on a latent trait (sometimes referred to as a construct) or other abstract trait, some questions in the TALIS 2018 questionnaires were combined into an index or scale. This chapter explains how the indices were created and describes the methodology used to validate scales and construct scale scores. It details latent trait evaluation and the procedure involved in computing scale scores and illustrates the implications of the evaluation results for using scale scores in further analyses. The chapter also describes the possibilities and limitations of using scale scores for cross-country/economy comparisons and presents each scale in more detail together with its statistical properties. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Effects of anchoring vignettes on comparability and predictive validity of student self-reports in […]
He, Jia; Buchholz, Janine; Klieme, Eckhard
Journal Article
| In: Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology | 2017
37052 Endnote
Author(s):
He, Jia; Buchholz, Janine; Klieme, Eckhard
Title:
Effects of anchoring vignettes on comparability and predictive validity of student self-reports in 64 cultures
In:
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48 (2017) 3, S. 319-334
DOI:
10.1177/0022022116687395
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-dipfdocs-156073
URL:
http://www.dipfdocs.de/volltexte/2018/15607/pdf/0022022116687395_A.pdf
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Bewertung; Internationaler Vergleich; Item-Response-Theory; Klassenführung; Kultureinfluss; Mathematikunterricht; Messverfahren; Modell; Motivation; OECD-Länder; PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; Qualität; Schüler; Schülerleistungstest; Schülerorientierter Unterricht; Selbsteinschätzung; Unterricht; Validität; Vignette <Methode>
Abstract (english):
Anchoring vignettes are item batteries especially designed for correcting responses that might be affected by incomparability. This article investigates the effects of anchoring vignettes on the validity of student self-report data in 64 cultures. Using secondary data analysis from the 2012 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), we checked the validity of ratings on vignette questions, and investigated how rescaled item responses of two student scales, Teacher Support and Classroom Management, enhanced comparability and predictive validity. The main findings include that (a) responses to vignette questions represent valid individual and cultural differences; in particular, violations in these responses (i.e., misorderings) are related to low socioeconomic status and low cognitive sophistication; (b) the rescaled responses tend to show higher levels of comparability; and (c) the associations of rescaled Teacher Support and Classroom Management with math achievement, Student-Oriented Instruction, and Teacher-Directed Instruction are slightly different from raw scores of the two target constructs, and the associations with rescaled scores seem to be more in line with the literature. Namely, the associations among all self-report Likerttype scales are weaker with rescaled scores, presumably reducing common method variance, and both rescaled scale scores are more positively related to math achievement. The country ranking also changes substantially; in particular, Asian cultures top the ranking on Teacher Support after rescaling. However, anchoring vignettes are not a cure-all in solving measurement bias in crosscultural surveys; we discuss the technicality and directions for further research on this technique. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Extreme response style as a cultural response to climato-economic deprivation
He, Jia; Vliert, Evert van de; Vijver, Fons J. R. van de
Journal Article
| In: International Journal of Psychology | 2017
36603 Endnote
Author(s):
He, Jia; Vliert, Evert van de; Vijver, Fons J. R. van de
Title:
Extreme response style as a cultural response to climato-economic deprivation
In:
International Journal of Psychology, 52 (2017) S1, S. 67-71
DOI:
10.1002/ijop.12287
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Klima; Wirkung; PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; Jugendlicher; Fragebogenerhebung; Befragung; Antwort; Meinung; Wohlstand; Armut; Kultureinfluss; Einstellung <Psy>; Internationaler Vergleich; Empirische Untersuchung; Regressionsanalyse; OECD-Länder; Welt
Abstract:
We investigated the effects of climato-economic harshness on extreme response style. Climato-economic theorising postulates that a more threatening climate in poorer countries, in contrast to countries with a more comforting climate and richer countries with a more challenging climate, triggers intolerance of ambiguity and uncertainty avoidance inherent to conservatism, in-group favouritism and autocracy. Scores of extreme response style at country level, a proxy of this cluster of cultural characteristics, were extracted from students' responses in the Programme for International Student Assessment to test the hypothesis. In a series of hierarchical regression analysis across 64 countries, cold demands, heat demands and GDP per capita showed a highly significant interaction effect on extreme response style, predicting in total 30.7% of the variance. Extreme response style was highest in poorer countries with higher climatic demands, and lowest in richer countries with lower climate demands. Implications are discussed. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Time-on-task effects in digital reading are non-linear and moderated by persons' skills and tasks' […]
Naumann, Johannes; Goldhammer, Frank
Journal Article
| In: Learning and Individual Differences | 2017
36715 Endnote
Author(s):
Naumann, Johannes; Goldhammer, Frank
Title:
Time-on-task effects in digital reading are non-linear and moderated by persons' skills and tasks' demands
In:
Learning and Individual Differences, 53 (2017) , S. 1-16
DOI:
10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.002
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Digitale Medien; Hypertext; Internationaler Vergleich; Kognitive Prozesse; Leistungsmessung; Lesekompetenz; Lesen; Leseverstehen; Modell; OECD-Länder; PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; Problemlösen; Schülerleistung; Technologiebasiertes Testen; Testaufgabe; Testkonstruktion; Wirkung; Zeit
Abstract:
Time-on-task effects on response accuracy in digital reading tasks were examined using PISA 2009 data (N = 34,062, 19 countries/economies). As a baseline, task responses were explained by time on task, tasks' easiness, and persons' digital reading skill (Model 1). Model 2 added a quadratic time-on-task effect, persons' comprehension skill and tasks' navigation demands as predictors. In each country, linear and quadratic time-on-task effects were moderated by person and task characteristics. Strongly positive linear time-on-task effects were found for persons being poor digital readers (Model 1) and poor comprehenders (Model 2), which decreased with increasing skill. Positive linear time-on-task effects were found for hard tasks (Model 1) and tasks high in navigation demands (Model 2). For easy tasks and tasks low in navigation demands, the time-on-task effects were negative, or close to zero, respectively. A negative quadratic component of the time-on-task effect was more pronounced for strong comprehenders, while the linear component was weaker. Correspondingly, for tasks high in navigation demands the negative quadratic component to the time-on-task effect was weaker, and the linear component was stronger. These results are in line with a dual-processing account of digital reading that distinguishes automatic reading components from resource-demanding regulation and navigation processes. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
PISA 2015. Eine Studie zwischen Kontinuität und Innovation
Reiss, Kristina; Sälzer, Christine; Schiepe-Tiska, Anja; Klieme, Eckhard; Köller, Olaf (Hrsg.)
Compilation Book
| Münster: Waxmann | 2016
36828 Endnote
Editor(s)
Reiss, Kristina; Sälzer, Christine; Schiepe-Tiska, Anja; Klieme, Eckhard; Köller, Olaf
Title:
PISA 2015. Eine Studie zwischen Kontinuität und Innovation
Published:
Münster: Waxmann, 2016
URL:
https://www.waxmann.com/fileadmin/media/zusatztexte/3555Volltext.pdf
Publication Type:
2. Herausgeberschaft; Sammelband (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Deutsch
Keywords:
Deutschland; Einstellung <Psy>; Eltern; Empirische Untersuchung; Entdeckendes Lernen; Forschendes Lernen; Fragebogen; Freude; Geschlechtsspezifischer Unterschied; Interesse; Internationale Organisation; Internationaler Vergleich; Jugendlicher; Kompetenzerwerb; Konzeption; Leistungsmessung; Lernbedingungen; Lernumgebung; Lesekompetenz; Mathematische Kompetenz; Migrationshintergrund; Motivation; Naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenz; Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht; OECD-Länder; Organisation; PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; Qualität; Querschnittuntersuchung; Reliabilität; Schulentwicklung; Schülerleistung; Schülerleistungstest; Schulform; Schulklima; Sekundarbereich; Selbstwirksamkeit; Skalierung; Soziale Herkunft; Stichprobe; Technologiebasiertes Testen; Teilnehmer; Testaufgabe; Testauswertung; Testdurchführung; Testkonstruktion; Testmethodik; Überzeugung; Validität; Veränderung; Wahrnehmung
Abstract:
Alle drei Jahre testet PISA den Stand der Grundbildung fünfzehnjähriger Jugendlicher in den Bereichen Naturwissenschaften, Mathematik und Lesen und untersucht so Stärken und Schwächen von Bildungssystemen im Vergleich der OECD-Staaten. Zentral ist dabei die Frage, inwieweit es den teilnehmenden Staaten gelingt, die Schülerinnen und Schüler während der Schulpflicht auf ihre weiteren Bildungs- und Berufswege vorzubereiten. Der nationale Berichtsband stellt die Ergebnisse aus PISA 2015 vor, die von den Schülerinnen und Schülern in Deutschland erreicht wurden, und setzt sie in Relation zu den Ergebnissen in anderen OECD-Staaten. Der Schwerpunkt der Erhebungen und Auswertungen liegt dabei auf den Naturwissenschaften. PISA 2015 bildet als sechste Erhebungsrunde des Programme for International Student Assessment der OECD zugleich den Abschluss des zweiten Zyklus der Studie und den Beginn der computerbasierten Testung. Unter Beibehaltung wesentlicher Standards der Datenerhebung und -auswertung wurden in PISA 2015 mit dem Erhebungsmodus am Computer, einem differenzierteren Skalierungsmodell und einem erweiterten Testdesign mehrere Neuerungen eingeführt. Sie tragen Veränderungen in der Lern- und Lebenswelt Rechnung und werden die Aussagekraft der PISA-Studien auf lange Sicht verbessern. Mit Blick auf diese Balance zwischen Kontinuität und Innovation werden die Befunde aus PISA 2015 in diesem Band eingeordnet und diskutiert. (DIPF/Verlag)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
The quest for comparability. Studying the invariance of the Teachers' Sense of Self-Efficacy (TSES) […]
Scherer, Ronny; Jansen, Malte; Nilsen, Trude; Areepattamannil, Shaljan; Marsh, Herbert W.
Journal Article
| In: PLoS ONE | 2016
36332 Endnote
Author(s):
Scherer, Ronny; Jansen, Malte; Nilsen, Trude; Areepattamannil, Shaljan; Marsh, Herbert W.
Title:
The quest for comparability. Studying the invariance of the Teachers' Sense of Self-Efficacy (TSES) measure across countries
In:
PLoS ONE, (2016) , S. 0150829
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0150829
URL:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0150829
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Arbeitszufriedenheit; Befragung; Berufserfahrung; Empirische Untersuchung; Internationaler Vergleich; Klassenführung; Lehrer; Messung; OECD-Länder; Selbstwirksamkeit; Strukturgleichungsmodell; Überzeugung; Unterricht; Verhalten
Abstract (english):
Teachers' self-efficacy is an important motivational construct that is positively related to a variety of outcomes for both the teachers and their students. This study addresses challenges associated with the commonly used 'Teachers' Sense of Self-Efficacy (TSES)' measure across countries and provides a synergism between substantive research on teachers' self-efficacy and the novel methodological approach of exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM). These challenges include adequately representing the conceptual overlap between the facets of self-efficacy in a measurement model (cross-loadings) and comparing means and factor structures across countries (measurement invariance). On the basis of the OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2013 data set comprising 32 countries (N = 164,687), we investigate the effects of cross-loadings in the TSES measurement model on the results of measurement invariance testing and the estimation of relations to external constructs (i.e., working experience, job satisfaction). To further test the robustness of our results, we replicate the 32-countries analyses for three selected sub-groups of countries (i.e., Nordic, East and South-East Asian, and Anglo-Saxon country clusters). For each of the TALIS 2013 participating countries, we found that the factor structure of the self-efficacy measure is better represented by ESEM than by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models that do not allow for cross-loadings. For both ESEM and CFA, only metric invariance could be achieved. Nevertheless, invariance levels beyond metric invariance are better achieved with ESEM within selected country clusters. Moreover, the existence of cross-loadings did not affect the relations between the dimensions of teachers' self-efficacy and external constructs. Overall, this study shows that a conceptual overlap between the facets of self-efficacy exists and can be well-represented by ESEM. We further argue for the cross-cultural generalizability of the corresponding measurement model. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Struktur und Steuerung des Bildungswesens
The motivation-achievement paradox in international educational achievement tests. Towards a better […]
He, Jia; Vijver, Fons J. R. van de
Book Chapter
| Aus: King, R. B.; Bernardo, A. B. I. (Hrsg.): The psychology of Asian learners | Singapur: Springer | 2016
35973 Endnote
Author(s):
He, Jia; Vijver, Fons J. R. van de
Title:
The motivation-achievement paradox in international educational achievement tests. Towards a better understanding
In:
King, R. B.; Bernardo, A. B. I. (Hrsg.): The psychology of Asian learners, Singapur: Springer, 2016 , S. 253-268
Publication Type:
4. Beiträge in Sammelwerken; Sammelband (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Bildung; China; Einflussfaktor; Empirische Untersuchung; Internationaler Vergleich; Kulturdifferenz; Kultureinfluss; Leistungsmessung; Lernmotivation; Mathematische Kompetenz; Motivation; OECD-Länder; PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; Schülerleistung; Schülerleistungstest; Vignette <Methode>; Wertschätzung
Abstract (english):
There is a recurrent paradox in the data of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA): within each participating country, there is a positive correlation between students' learning motivation and achievement; when aggregating the data at country level, this correlation becomes negative. Using PISA data across 64 countries, we investigate the association of motivation and achievement within and between countries and attempt to explain the paradox with three measures indicative of culturally preferred scale usage: cultural response style, overclaiming, and anchoring vignettes. We confirmed the paradox and found that the three measures, in particular anchoring vignettes, could partially explain the negative association between motivation and achievement at country level. Our study is intellectually indebted to the tradition, initiated by David Watkins, to go beyond a simple classification of Chinese learners as focusing on rote memory learning. We illustrate how core Chinese values impinge on educational motivation and achievement and can help to explain seemingly paradoxical cross-cultural differences. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Effects of a general response style on cross-cultural comparisons. Evidence from the teaching and […]
He, Jia; Vijver, Fons J. R. van de
Journal Article
| In: Public Opinion Quarterly | 2015
35969 Endnote
Author(s):
He, Jia; Vijver, Fons J. R. van de
Title:
Effects of a general response style on cross-cultural comparisons. Evidence from the teaching and learning international survey
In:
Public Opinion Quarterly, 79 (2015) S1, S. 267-290
DOI:
10.1093/poq/nfv006
URL:
http://poq.oxfordjournals.org/content/79/S1/267.abstract
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Antwort; Arbeitsbedingungen; Faktorenanalyse; Fragebogen; Fragebogenerhebung; Interkultureller Vergleich; Internationaler Vergleich; Kooperation; Lehrer; Lehrerfortbildung; OECD-Länder; Partizipation; Selbstwirksamkeit; Wirkung; Zufriedenheit
Abstract:
This paper investigates the integration of response styles (extreme and midpoint responding and socially desirable responding) and their effects on self-reports among 76,887 teachers from 18 countries in the Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS). Socially desirable responding (with a positive and a negative impression management factor) and 17 core constructs related to the teaching profession were measured with Likert scales; extreme and midpoint response styles were derived from these measures. Using factor analysis, a general response style was extracted with socially desirable and extreme response styles as positive indicators and midpoint response style as a negative indicator. This general response style was more strongly correlated with constructs of personal involvement, such as teacher efficacy and job satisfaction, than constructs with less personal involvement, at both the individual and country level; however, statistical correction for response styles had negligible effects on the size of cross-cultural differences and country rankings in any construct. We conclude that the general response style can be interpreted as response amplification versus moderation, and that there is no indication that correcting for the general response style increases the validity of cross-cultural comparisons of TALIS teacher data. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Unselect matches
Select all matches
Export
<
1
2
3
...
6
>
Show all
(52)