Menü Überspringen
Contact
Deutsch
English
Not track
Data Protection
Search
Log in
DIPF News
Research
Infrastructures
Institute
Zurück
Contact
Deutsch
English
Not track
Data Protection
Search
Home
>
Research
>
Publications
>
Publications Data Base
Search results in the DIPF database of publications
Your query:
(Schlagwörter: "Student")
Advanced Search
Search term
Only Open Access
Search
Unselect matches
Select all matches
Export
272
items matching your search terms.
Show all details
I don't really belong here. Examining sense of belonging in immigrant and nonimmigrant teacher […]
Wolf, Kristin; Maurer, Christina; Kunter, Mareike
Journal Article
| In: Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie | 2021
41482 Endnote
Author(s):
Wolf, Kristin; Maurer, Christina; Kunter, Mareike
Title:
I don't really belong here. Examining sense of belonging in immigrant and nonimmigrant teacher students
In:
Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 53 (2021) 1/2, S. 1-14
DOI:
10.1026/0049-8637/a000233
URL:
https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1026/0049-8637/a000233
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Lehramtsstudent; Migrationshintergrund; Soziale Beziehung; Gemeinschaft; Studienabbruch; Hochschulbildung; Lehrerausbildung; Studienfach; Universität; Student; Befragung; Datenanalyse; Strukturgleichungsmodell; Empirische Untersuchung; Deutschland
Abstract:
Die vorliegende Studie untersucht die Bedeutung des Zugehörigkeitsgefühls von Lehramtsstudierenden für deren Studienabbruchintention mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Studierenden mit Migrationshintergrund. Es wurden 925 deutsche Lehramtsstudierende zu zwei Messzeitpunkten befragt. Die Ergebnisse bestätigen die Bedeutung des Zugehörigkeitsgefühls für die Studienabbruchintention von Lehramtsstudierenden. Strukturgleichungsmodelle zeigen, dass Studierende mit Migrationshintergrund ein geringeres Zugehörigkeitsgefühl und höhere Studienabbruchintention berichten. (DIPF/Orig.)
Abstract (english):
The present study investigates the role of sense of belonging on dropout intention in teacher education with a special focus on immigrant teacher students. We present data from a survey of 925 German teacher students using two times of measurement. The results confirm the significance of sense of belonging for the dropout rate among students in teacher education and support our hypotheses that immigrant students show a lower sense of belonging and higher dropout intentions. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Lehr und Lernqualität in Bildungseinrichtungen
Global competence in PISA 2018. Einstellungen von Fünfzehnjährigen in Deutschland zu globalen und […]
Weis, Mirjam; Reiss, Kristina; Mang, Julia; Schiepe-Tiska, Anja; Diedrich, Jenniger; Roczen, Nina; […]
Monograph
| Münster: Waxmann | 2020
40667 Endnote
Author(s):
Weis, Mirjam; Reiss, Kristina; Mang, Julia; Schiepe-Tiska, Anja; Diedrich, Jenniger; Roczen, Nina; Jude, Nina
Title:
Global competence in PISA 2018. Einstellungen von Fünfzehnjährigen in Deutschland zu globalen und interkulturellen Themen
Published:
Münster: Waxmann, 2020 (Wissenschaft macht Schule, 2)
DOI:
10.31244/978383099300
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-210696
URL:
https://www.pedocs.de/frontdoor.php?source_opus=21069
Publication Type:
1. Monographien (Autorenschaft); Monographie
Language:
Deutsch
Keywords:
Deutschland; Einstellung <Psy>; Eltern; Fragebogenerhebung; Globales Denken; Globales Lernen; Globalisierung; Interkulturalität; Interkulturelle Kompetenz; Internationaler Vergleich; Jugendlicher; Lehrer; PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; Schüler; Schülerperspektive; Schulform; Schulleiter; Selbsteinschätzung
Abstract:
In der PISA-Studie 2018 wurde als innovative Domäne erstmals Global Competence bei fünfzehnjährigen Schülerinnen und Schülern erfasst. In dieser Zusatzerhebung werden das selbsteingeschätzte Wissen von Schülerinnen und Schülern zu Themen mit lokaler und globaler Bedeutung (z. B. Klimawandel, Armut, Pandemien) sowie ihre Einstellungen zu globalen und interkulturellen Themen in den Blick genommen. Dabei geht es beispielsweise um den respektvollen Umgang mit Menschen unterschiedlicher nationaler Herkunft und entsprechendem ethnischen, religiösen, sozialen oder kulturellen Hintergrund. Diese Broschüre stellt die Ergebnisse der Schülerinnen und Schüler in Deutschland aus der Zusatzauswertung Global Competence bei der PISA-Studie 2018 vor und betrachtet diese im internationalen Vergleich. Zusätzlich werden die Sicht der Schulleitungen und Lehrkräfte in den verschiedenen Schularten sowie die Sicht der Eltern einbezogen. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Forschungsinstrumente im Kontext institutioneller (schrift-)sprachlicher Bildung
Mackowiak, Katja; Beckerle, Christine; Gentrup, Sarah; Titz, Cora (Hrsg.)
Compilation Book
| Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt | 2020
40628 Endnote
Editor(s)
Mackowiak, Katja; Beckerle, Christine; Gentrup, Sarah; Titz, Cora
Title:
Forschungsinstrumente im Kontext institutioneller (schrift-)sprachlicher Bildung
Published:
Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt, 2020
DOI:
doi.org/1035468/5801
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-201399
URL:
https://www.pedocs.de/frontdoor.php?source_opus=20139
Publication Type:
2. Herausgeberschaft; Sammelband (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Deutsch
Keywords:
Aktivierung; Anwendung; Auswertung; Baden-Württemberg; Bayern; Beobachtung; Beobachtungsmethode; Berufliche Kompetenz; Bewertung; Bildungsforschung; Bildungspraxis; Datenerfassung; Deutschland; Deutschunterricht; Diagnostik; Dokumentation; Empirische Forschung; Erhebungsinstrument; Erzieher; Erzieherin; Fachdidaktik; Fachsprache; Fachunterricht; Fachwissen; Feed-back; Förderdiagnostik; Förderung; Forschung; Forschungsmethode; Fragebogen; Grundschule; Handlungskompetenz; Instrument; Interview; Kind; Kindergarten; Kindergartenalltag; Kindergartenpädagogik; Kindertagesstätte; Kompetenz; Kompetenzmessung; Korrektur; Längsschnittuntersuchung; Lehramtsstudent; Lehrer; Lehrer-Schüler-Interaktion; Leitfadeninterview; Leseförderung; Lesekompetenz; Mathematikunterricht; Messinstrument; Methode; Nordrhein-Westfalen; Pädagogische Fachkraft; Pädagogisches Handeln; Primarbereich; Profession; Professionalisierung; Protokoll; Psychometrie; Qualitative Forschung; Quantitative Forschung; Reflexion <Phil>; Sachsen-Anhalt; Schriftsprache; Schule; Schüler; Schülermitarbeit; Sekundarstufe I; Software; Sprachbildung; Sprachdiagnostik; Spracherwerb; Sprachförderung; Sprachgebrauch; Sprachkompetenz; Sprachpraktische Übung; Sprachstandsforschung; Test; Testkonstruktion; Testvalidität; Testverfahren; Transfer; Unterricht; Videoanalyse; Videoaufzeichnung; Vignette <Methode>; Wissen; Wissenstest
Abstract:
Das Buch stellt sieben Verfahren vor, die unterschiedliche Facetten (schrift-)sprachlicher Bildung erfassen. Die Verfahren fokussieren unterschiedlcihe Aspekte der Sprachbildung sowie Sprach- und Leseförderung in Kindertageseinrichtungen und Schulen und adressieren unterschiedliche Zielgruppen (pädagogische Fachkräfte, Lehrkräfte, Kinder). Die Instrumente wurden im Rahmen der Initiative "Bildung durch Sprache und Schrift" (BiSS) entwickelt und primär für Forschungszwecke, jedoch auch in der Aus- und Weiterbildung von pädagogischen Fach- und Lehrkräften einsetzbar. Ein online-Anhang stellt die Instrumente sowie alle notwendigen Materialien zur Verfügung.
DIPF-Departments:
Bildung und Entwicklung
Do student ratings provide reliable and valid information about teaching quality at the school […]
Aditomo, Anindito; Köhler, Carmen
Journal Article
| In: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability | 2020
40512 Endnote
Author(s):
Aditomo, Anindito; Köhler, Carmen
Title:
Do student ratings provide reliable and valid information about teaching quality at the school level? Evaluating measures of science teaching in PISA 2015
In:
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32 (2020) 3, S. 275-310
DOI:
10.1007/s11092-020-09328-6
URL:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11092-020-09328-6
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht; Qualität; Messung; Evaluation; Schüler; Bewertung; Schülerurteil; Validität; Reliabilität; Schulklima; Einflussfaktor; Wirkung; PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; Modell; Faktorenanalyse; Empirische Untersuchung; OECD-Länder
Abstract:
Large-scale educational surveys, including PISA, often collect student ratings to assess teaching quality. Because of the sampling design in PISA, student ratings must be aggregated at the school level instead of the classroom level. To what extent does school-level aggregation of student ratings yield reliable and valid measures of teaching quality? We investigate this question for six scales measuring classroom management, emotional support, inquiry-based instruction, teacher-directed instruction, adaptive instruction, and feedback provided by PISA 2015. The sample consisted of 503,146 students from 17,678 schools in 69 countries/regions. Multilevel CFA and SEM were conducted for each scale in each country/region to evaluate school-level reliability (intraclass correlations 1 and 2), factorial validity, and predictive validity. In most countries/regions, school-level reliability was found to be adequate for the classroom management scale, but only low to moderate for the other scales. Examination of factorial and predictive validity indicated that the classroom management, emotional support, adaptive instruction, and teacher-directed instruction scales capture meaningful differences in teaching quality between schools. Meanwhile, the inquiry scale exhibited poor validity in almost all countries/regions. These findings suggest the possibility of using student ratings in PISA to investigate some aspects of school-level teaching quality in most countries/regions. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
German pre-service teachers' evaluations of and reactions to interethnic social exclusion scenarios
Beißert, Hanna; Bonefeld, Meike
Journal Article
| In: Frontiers in Education | 2020
40848 Endnote
Author(s):
Beißert, Hanna; Bonefeld, Meike
Title:
German pre-service teachers' evaluations of and reactions to interethnic social exclusion scenarios
In:
Frontiers in Education, (2020) , S. 5:586962
DOI:
10.3389/feduc.2020.586962
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-231031
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-231031
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Schüler; Soziale Ausgrenzung; Ethnischer Aspekt; Lehramtsstudent; Bewertung; Reaktion; Intervention; Befragung; Szenarium; Deutschland
Abstract (english):
This study investigated pre-service teachers' evaluations, reactions, and interventions with regard to interethnic exclusion scenarios in Germany. More specifically, we focused on pre-service teachers (N = 145, 99 female, Mage= 21.34) in the role of observers of exclusion among students. Using hypothetical scenarios in which either a German or a Turkish boy was excluded by other children of his class, we assessed teachers' evaluations of this exclusion behavior. This included evaluating how likely teachers were to intervene in the situation and what they would specifically do. The aim of this research was to examine whether the origin of an excluded student represents a relevant category for teachers' evaluations of and reactions to social exclusion. In addition, we aimed to determine whether teachers include aspects related to group functioning in their considerations. The analyses demonstrated that teachers generally reject social exclusion, with female participants rejecting exclusion even more than male participants. Further, participants evaluated the exclusion of a Turkish protagonist as more reprehensible than the exclusion of a German protagonist. Regarding the likelihood of intervention, the origin of the excluded person was only relevant for male participants; i.e., they were less likely to intervene when the excluded person was German than when the excluded person was Turkish. Analyses of teachers' reasoning revealed their strong focus on inclusion as a social norm, especially in cases of interethnic exclusion. That is, when participants reasoned about the exclusion of the Turkish protagonist, they referred to the social norm of inclusion much more than when talking about the German protagonist. In contrast, aspects related to group functioning were scarcely of importance. In terms of the specific actions that participants would undertake as a reaction to the exclusion situation, no differences related to the origin of the excluded person were found. Hence, the origin of the excluded person factored into both the evaluation of the exclusion and the likelihood of intervention, but once the decision to intervene was made, there were no differences in the specific actions. The results are discussed in light of practical implications and teacher training as well as in terms of implications for future research.
DIPF-Departments:
Bildung und Entwicklung
Same same but different? Non-traditional students and alumni in Germany
Brändle, Tobias; Ordemann, Jessica
Journal Article
| In: Studia paedagogica | 2020
40626 Endnote
Author(s):
Brändle, Tobias; Ordemann, Jessica
Title:
Same same but different? Non-traditional students and alumni in Germany
In:
Studia paedagogica, 25 (2020) 4, S. 17
DOI:
10.5817/SP2020-4-2
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-252224
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-252224
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Student; Studentin; Alumne; Studium; Zweiter Bildungsweg; Motivation; Studienleistung; Berufseintritt; Erfolg; Sozialer Status; Einkommen; Vergleich; Literaturbericht; Deutschland
Abstract (english):
The article gives an overview about current research of non-traditional students and alumni in Germany. Its aim is to highlight similarities and differences with their traditional counterparts. The paper concentrates on the motivation to study, the study performance, and labor market success (status and income) of those who do not hold a traditional higher education entry certificate but entered university via their occupational qualification. We show a widespread divergence in findings from no statistical difference at all to clear differences between non-traditionals and traditionals. This holds true, with regard to student motivation, study performance, and labor market success after graduation. We conclude that biggest challenge are the non-completion rates of non-traditionals, which pose a development task for institutions of higher education.
DIPF-Departments:
Struktur und Steuerung des Bildungswesens
Epistemic network analyses of economics students' graph understanding. An eye-tracking study
Bruekner, Sebastian; Schneider, Jan; Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga; Drachsler, Hendrik
Journal Article
| In: Sensors | 2020
40768 Endnote
Author(s):
Bruekner, Sebastian; Schneider, Jan; Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga; Drachsler, Hendrik
Title:
Epistemic network analyses of economics students' graph understanding. An eye-tracking study
In:
Sensors, 20 (2020) 23, S. 6908
DOI:
10.3390/s20236908
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-232289
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-232289
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Diagramm; Verstehen; Erkenntnis; Student; Hochschule; Wirtschaftswissenschaften; Physik; Netzwerkanalyse; Erkenntnistheorie; Augenbewegung; Bewegungsanalyse; Datenanalyse; Deutschland
Abstract (english):
Learning to solve graph tasks is one of the key prerequisites of acquiring domain-specific knowledge in most study domains. Analyses of graph understanding often use eye-tracking and focus on analyzing how much time students spend gazing at particular areas of a graph-Areas of Interest (AOIs). To gain a deeper insight into students' task-solving process, we argue that the gaze shifts between students' fixations on different AOIs (so-termed transitions) also need to be included in holistic analyses of graph understanding that consider the importance of transitions for the task-solving process. Thus, we introduced Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) as a novel approach to analyze eye-tracking data of 23 university students who solved eight multiple-choice graph tasks in physics and economics. ENA is a method for quantifying, visualizing, and interpreting network data allowing a weighted analysis of the gaze patterns of both correct and incorrect graph task solvers considering the interrelations between fixations and transitions. After an analysis of the differences in the number of fixations and the number of single transitions between correct and incorrect solvers, we conducted an ENA for each task. We demonstrate that an isolated analysis of fixations and transitions provides only a limited insight into graph solving behavior. In contrast, ENA identifies differences between the gaze patterns of students who solved the graph tasks correctly and incorrectly across the multiple graph tasks. For instance, incorrect solvers shifted their gaze from the graph to the x-axis and from the question to the graph comparatively more often than correct solvers. The results indicate that incorrect solvers often have problems transferring textual information into graphical information and rely more on partly irrelevant parts of a graph. Finally, we discuss how the findings can be used to design experimental studies and for innovative instructional procedures in higher education.
DIPF-Departments:
Informationszentrum Bildung
Measurement invariance testing in questionnaires. A comparison of three Multigroup-CFA and […]
Buchholz, Janine; Hartig, Johannes
Journal Article
| In: Psychological Test and Assessment Modelling | 2020
39818 Endnote
Author(s):
Buchholz, Janine; Hartig, Johannes
Title:
Measurement invariance testing in questionnaires. A comparison of three Multigroup-CFA and IRT-based approaches
In:
Psychological Test and Assessment Modelling, 62 (2020) 1, S. 29-54
URL:
https://www.psychologie-aktuell.com/fileadmin/Redaktion/Journale/ptam-2020-1/03_Buchholz.pdf
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; Item-Response-Theorie; Faktorenanalyse; Schülerleistung; Leistungsmessung; Messung; Invarianz; Validität; Statistische Methode
Abstract (english):
International Large-Scale Assessments aim at comparisons of countries with respect to latent constructs such as attitudes, values and beliefs. Measurement invariance (MI) needs to hold in order for such comparisons to be valid. Several statistical approaches to test for MI have been proposed: While Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MGCFA) is particularly popular, a newer, IRT-based approach was introduced for non-cognitive constructs in PISA 2015, thus raising the question of consistency between these approaches. A total of three approaches (MGCFA for ordinal and continuous data, multi-group IRT) were applied to simulated data containing different types and extents of MI violations, and to the empirical non-cognitive PISA 2015 data. Analyses are based on indices of the magnitude (i.e., parameter-specific modification indices resulting from MGCFA and group-specific item fit statistics resulting from the IRT approach) and direction of local misfit (i.e., standardized parameter change and mean deviation, respectively). Results indicate that all measures were sensitive to (some) MI violations and more consistent in identifying group differences in item difficulty parameters.
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung von Überzeugungen Lehramtsstudierender zum Unterrichten […]
Dignath, Charlotte; Meschede, Nicola; Kunter, Mareike; Hardy, Ilonca
Journal Article
| In: Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht | 2020
40511 Endnote
Author(s):
Dignath, Charlotte; Meschede, Nicola; Kunter, Mareike; Hardy, Ilonca
Title:
Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung von Überzeugungen Lehramtsstudierender zum Unterrichten in heterogenen Klassen: Befunde zur Kriteriumsvalidität und Veränderungssensitivität
In:
Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 67 (2020) 3, S. 194-211
DOI:
10.2378/peu2020.art16d
URL:
https://reinhardt-journals.de/index.php/peu/article/view/152742
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Language:
Deutsch
Keywords:
Heterogenität; Lehramtsstudent; Schulklasse; Überzeugung; Einstellung <Psy>; Messverfahren; Fragebogen; Konzeption; Validität; Reliabilität; Berufliche Kompetenz; Behindertes Kind; Inklusion; Migrationshintergrund; Leistung; Leistungsdifferenzierung; Schulform; Modell
Abstract:
Es liegen bisher nur wenige Instrumente vor, um Überzeugungen von Lehrpersonen zum Unterrichten in heterogenen Klassen im Sinne eines breiten Inklusionsbegriffs zu untersuchen. In drei Studien wurden die Struktur und die Validität von drei Skalen zu Überzeugungen zum Unterrichten in heterogenen Klassen von Lehramtsstudierenden untersucht. Die Skalen wurden in Anlehnung an das Instrument KIESEL von Bosse und Spörer (2014) zusätzlich zur Heterogenitätsdimension Behinderung (d.h. die gemeinsame Regelbeschulung von Schülerinnen und Schülern mit und ohne sonderpädagogischen Förderbedarf) um die Heterogenitätsdimensionen Kulturelle Heterogenität und Leistungsbezogene Heterogenität erweitert. Im Rahmen mehrerer Validierungsstudien wurde die Sensitivität des Instruments mit Blick auf erwartete Gruppenunterschiede sowie auf die Veränderung durch Instruktion überprüft. Die Skalen können weiterhin zwischen verschiedenen Konstrukten, z.B. Selbstwirksamkeit, diskriminieren.
Abstract (english):
Only few instruments have been developed to assess such beliefs in teachers concerning various dimensions of heterogeneity following the wide definition of inclusion. In three studies we investigated the structure and the validity of three scales on heterogeneity beliefs. The scales were developed based on the instrument KIESEL by Bosse and Spörer (2014), adding two belief scales regarding cultural heterogeneity and performance-based heterogeneity to their scale on inclusive beliefs (i. e., teaching students with and without special educational needs within the same classroom). In several validity studies, we tested the sensitivity of the instrument regarding differences between groups as well as the assessment of beliefs development over time. Furthermore, the scales can discriminate between different constructs, for example, beliefs and self-efficacy.
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Using process data to explain group differences in complex problem solving
Eichmann, Beate; Goldhammer, Frank; Greiff, Samuel; Brandhuber, Liene; Naumann, Johannes
Journal Article
| In: Journal of Educational Psychology | 2020
39868 Endnote
Author(s):
Eichmann, Beate; Goldhammer, Frank; Greiff, Samuel; Brandhuber, Liene; Naumann, Johannes
Title:
Using process data to explain group differences in complex problem solving
In:
Journal of Educational Psychology, 112 (2020) 8, S. 1546-1562
DOI:
10.1037/edu0000446
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-232721
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-232721
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; Problemlösen; Schülerleistung; Leistungsmessung; Geschlechtsspezifischer Unterschied; Migrationshintergrund; Computerunterstütztes Verfahren; Logdatei; Interaktion; Exploration; Verhalten; Vorwissen; Wirkung; Indikator; Leistung; Unterschied; Messverfahren; OECD-Länder
Abstract:
In large-scale assessments, performance differences across different groups are regularly found. These group differences (e.g., gender differences) are often relevant for educational policy decisions and measures. However, the formation of these group differences usually remains unclear. We propose an approach for investigating this formation by considering behavioral process measures as mediating variables between group membership and performance on the 2012 Programme for International Student Assessment complex problem solving (CPS) items. We found that across all investigated countries interactive behavior can fully explain gender differences in CPS, but cannot explain differences between students with and without a migration background. However, in some countries these results differ from the cross-country results. Our results indicate that process measures derived from log data are useful for further investigating and explaining performance differences between girls and boys and students with and without migration background. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Unselect matches
Select all matches
Export
<
1
...
3
4
5
...
20
>
Show all
(272)