Menü Überspringen
Contact
Deutsch
English
Not track
Data Protection
Search
Log in
DIPF News
Research
Infrastructures
Institute
Zurück
Contact
Deutsch
English
Not track
Data Protection
Search
Home
>
Research
>
Publications
>
Publications Data Base
Search results in the DIPF database of publications
Your query:
(Schlagwörter: "Verfahren")
Advanced Search
Search term
Only Open Access
Search
Unselect matches
Select all matches
Export
358
items matching your search terms.
Show all details
Empirische Forschung zu Unterrichtsqualität. Theoretische Grundfragen und quantitative […]
Praetorius, Anna-Katharina; Grünkorn, Juliane; Klieme, Eckhard (Hrsg.)
Compilation Book
| Weinheim: Beltz Juventa | 2020
39924 Endnote
Editor(s)
Praetorius, Anna-Katharina; Grünkorn, Juliane; Klieme, Eckhard
Title:
Empirische Forschung zu Unterrichtsqualität. Theoretische Grundfragen und quantitative Modellierungen
Published:
Weinheim: Beltz Juventa, 2020 (Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. Beiheft, 66)
Publication Type:
2. Herausgeberschaft; Zeitschriftensonderheft
Language:
Englisch; Deutsch
Keywords:
Effektivität; Methodologie; Fachdidaktik; Unterrichtsprotokoll; Qualitätsentwicklung; Mehrebenenanalyse; Evaluation; Metaanalyse; Empirische Forschung; Unterricht; Qualität; Theorie; Modell; Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht; Nutzenansatz; Lehren; Lernen; Wirkung; Bildungsangebot; Nutzung; Unterrichtsforschung; Lernzeit; Messung; Messverfahren; Klassenführung; Lehrer; Schüler; Wahrnehmung
Abstract:
Ziel des 66. Beiheftes ist es, basierend auf dem aktuellen Erkenntnisstand, aber auch aus einer Meta-Perspektive heraus, zentrale theoretische und methodologische Herausforderungen des Forschungsfeldes Unterrichtsqualität zu identifizieren und eine Plattform für die dezidiert (selbst-)kritische Auseinandersetzung mit diesen zu bieten. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Ein Vergleich traditioneller und computergestützter Methoden zur Erstellung einer deutschsprachigen […]
Beißert, Hanna; Köhler, Meike; Rempel, Marina; Kruyen, Peter M.
Journal Article
| In: Diagnostica | 2020
39771 Endnote
Author(s):
Beißert, Hanna; Köhler, Meike; Rempel, Marina; Kruyen, Peter M.
Title:
Ein Vergleich traditioneller und computergestützter Methoden zur Erstellung einer deutschsprachigen Need for Cognition Kurzskala
In:
Diagnostica, 66 (2020) 1, S. 37-49
DOI:
10.1026/0012-1924/a000242
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-dipfdocs-237848
URL:
http://www.dipfdocs.de/volltexte/2022/23784/pdf/Diagnostica_2020_1_Beissert_et_al_Vergleich_traditioneller_und_computergestuetzter_A.pdf
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Deutsch
Keywords:
Skala; Item; Entwicklung; Computerunterstütztes Verfahren; Validierung; Freude; Erkenntnis
Abstract:
Die vorliegende Arbeit dient der Entwicklung einer Kurzskala zur Messung von Need for Cognition (NFC). Neben traditionellen Verfahren der Itemreduktion auf Basis von Itemkennwerten der klassischen Testtheorie wurde in Studie 1 (N = 282) ein neues, computergestütztes Verfahren des "full information approach" vorgestellt. Mithilfe der beiden Verfahren wurden 3 mögliche Skalen mit jeweils 5 Items selektiert, welche in einem unabhängigen Datensatz in Studie 2 (N = 530) Validierungskriterien unterzogen wurden. Aus den 3 Skalen mit ähnlichen Ergebnissen bezüglich der Gütekriterien wurde eine anhand der "full information approach" erstellten Skalen als finale Kurzskala NFC-K ausgewählt. Diese NFC-K weist ein Cronbachs α von .69 auf, eine Korrelation mit der Langskala von .81 und keinen signifikanten Zusammenhang mit sozialer Erwünschtheit. Neben der systematischen und objektiven Selektion und Validierung der Kurzskala NFC-K stellt die vorliegende Arbeit auch eine Fallstudie zu den Herausforderungen der Kurzskalenentwicklung auf Basis klassischer und computergestützter Selektionsverfahren dar. (DIPF/Orig.)
Abstract (english):
The current study presents the development and validation of a Need for Cognition (NFC) short scale. In Study 1 (N = 282), traditional item selection procedures based on classic test theory were used as well as an innovative computational approach, our "full information approach." The procedures led to three different short scales with comparable psychometric quality, which were validated in Study 2 (N = 530). Based on different validation criteria, one of the three scales obtained from the full information approach was selected as the final short scale NFC-K. This NFC-K achieved a Cronbach's α of .69, a correlation of .81 with the original scale, and showed no significant correlation with social desirability. Besides presenting a systematic and objective selection and validation of the NFC-K, this article represents a case study of the challenges of developing a short scale comparing both traditional and computational approaches. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildung und Entwicklung
Personality across the lifespan. Exploring measurement invariance of a short Big Five inventory […]
Brandt, Naemi D.; Becker, Michael; Tetzner, Julia; Brunner, Martin; Kuhl, Poldi; Maaz, Kai
Journal Article
| In: European Journal of Psychological Assessment | 2020
40322 Endnote
Author(s):
Brandt, Naemi D.; Becker, Michael; Tetzner, Julia; Brunner, Martin; Kuhl, Poldi; Maaz, Kai
Title:
Personality across the lifespan. Exploring measurement invariance of a short Big Five inventory from ages 11 to 84
In:
European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36 (2020) 1, S. 162-173
DOI:
10.1027/1015-5759/a000490
URL:
https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/1015-5759/a000490
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Deutschland; Persönlichkeit; Persönlichkeitsmerkmal; Lebensalter; Kindheit; Jugendalter; Erwachsener; Alter; Einflussfaktor; Indikator; Validität; Erhebungsinstrument; Temperament; Messverfahren; Vergleich; Faktorenanalyse; Strukturgleichungsmodell
Abstract:
Personality is a relevant predictor for important life outcomes across the entire lifespan. Although previous studies have suggested the comparability of the measurement of the Big Five personality traits across adulthood, the generalizability to childhood is largely unknown. The present study investigated the structure of the Big Five personality traits assessed with the Big Five Inventory-SOEP Version (BFI-S; SOEP = Socio-Economic Panel) across a broad age range spanning 11-84 years. We used two samples of N = 1,090 children (52% female, Mage = 11.87) and N = 18,789 adults (53% female, Mage = 51.09), estimating a multigroup CFA analysis across four age groups (late childhood: 11-14 years; early adulthood: 17-30 years; middle adulthood: 31-60 years; late adulthood: 61-84 years). Our results indicated the comparability of the personality trait metric in terms of general factor structure, loading patterns, and the majority of intercepts across all age groups. Therefore, the findings suggest both a reliable assessment of the Big Five personality traits with the BFI-S even in late childhood and a vastly comparable metric across age groups. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Struktur und Steuerung des Bildungswesens
The measurement of within-person affect variation
Brose, Annette; Schmiedek, Florian; Gerstorf, Denis; Voelkle, Manuel C.
Journal Article
| In: Emotion | 2020
39994 Endnote
Author(s):
Brose, Annette; Schmiedek, Florian; Gerstorf, Denis; Voelkle, Manuel C.
Title:
The measurement of within-person affect variation
In:
Emotion, 20 (2020) 4, S. 677-699
DOI:
10.1037/emo0000583
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-dipfdocs-206192
URL:
http://www.dipfdocs.de/volltexte/2020/20619/pdf/Emotion_2020_4_Brose_et_al_Measurement_of_within-person_affect_variation_A.pdf
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Emotion; Emotionaler Zustand; Veränderung; Messung; Erhebungsinstrument; Messverfahren; Reliabilität; Validität; Qualität; Konzeption; Vergleich; Empirische Forschung; Forschungsstand; Längsschnittuntersuchung; Literaturbericht
Abstract:
The number of intensive longitudinal studies that investigate affective experiences at the within-person rather than the between-person level is rapidly increasing. This paradigmatic shift comes with new challenges, such as questions revolving around how to measure within-person affect variation or more fundamental questions about the reliability and validity of constructs at the within-person level. We provide a review of substantive research published in Emotion since 2005, which revealed that to date no consensus has been established on measurement instruments for assessing within-person affective experiences. Our review also showed that researchers who are interested in within-person affect variation sometimes rely on measurement instruments that were established at the between-person level, which we think should be reconsidered. Finally, reliability estimates of state variation have been developed but are not comprehensively reported in studies on within-person affect variation. The purpose of this article is therefore to alert the reader to these issues and to highlight relevant criteria for selecting items and measurement instruments when studying within-person affect variation in intensive longitudinal studies. We recommend establishing common standards for measuring within-person affect variation and drawing from a common pool of instruments, which would allow direct comparison of results across studies. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildung und Entwicklung
Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung von Überzeugungen Lehramtsstudierender zum Unterrichten […]
Dignath, Charlotte; Meschede, Nicola; Kunter, Mareike; Hardy, Ilonca
Journal Article
| In: Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht | 2020
40511 Endnote
Author(s):
Dignath, Charlotte; Meschede, Nicola; Kunter, Mareike; Hardy, Ilonca
Title:
Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung von Überzeugungen Lehramtsstudierender zum Unterrichten in heterogenen Klassen: Befunde zur Kriteriumsvalidität und Veränderungssensitivität
In:
Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 67 (2020) 3, S. 194-211
DOI:
10.2378/peu2020.art16d
URL:
https://reinhardt-journals.de/index.php/peu/article/view/152742
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Language:
Deutsch
Keywords:
Heterogenität; Lehramtsstudent; Schulklasse; Überzeugung; Einstellung <Psy>; Messverfahren; Fragebogen; Konzeption; Validität; Reliabilität; Berufliche Kompetenz; Behindertes Kind; Inklusion; Migrationshintergrund; Leistung; Leistungsdifferenzierung; Schulform; Modell
Abstract:
Es liegen bisher nur wenige Instrumente vor, um Überzeugungen von Lehrpersonen zum Unterrichten in heterogenen Klassen im Sinne eines breiten Inklusionsbegriffs zu untersuchen. In drei Studien wurden die Struktur und die Validität von drei Skalen zu Überzeugungen zum Unterrichten in heterogenen Klassen von Lehramtsstudierenden untersucht. Die Skalen wurden in Anlehnung an das Instrument KIESEL von Bosse und Spörer (2014) zusätzlich zur Heterogenitätsdimension Behinderung (d.h. die gemeinsame Regelbeschulung von Schülerinnen und Schülern mit und ohne sonderpädagogischen Förderbedarf) um die Heterogenitätsdimensionen Kulturelle Heterogenität und Leistungsbezogene Heterogenität erweitert. Im Rahmen mehrerer Validierungsstudien wurde die Sensitivität des Instruments mit Blick auf erwartete Gruppenunterschiede sowie auf die Veränderung durch Instruktion überprüft. Die Skalen können weiterhin zwischen verschiedenen Konstrukten, z.B. Selbstwirksamkeit, diskriminieren.
Abstract (english):
Only few instruments have been developed to assess such beliefs in teachers concerning various dimensions of heterogeneity following the wide definition of inclusion. In three studies we investigated the structure and the validity of three scales on heterogeneity beliefs. The scales were developed based on the instrument KIESEL by Bosse and Spörer (2014), adding two belief scales regarding cultural heterogeneity and performance-based heterogeneity to their scale on inclusive beliefs (i. e., teaching students with and without special educational needs within the same classroom). In several validity studies, we tested the sensitivity of the instrument regarding differences between groups as well as the assessment of beliefs development over time. Furthermore, the scales can discriminate between different constructs, for example, beliefs and self-efficacy.
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Using process data to explain group differences in complex problem solving
Eichmann, Beate; Goldhammer, Frank; Greiff, Samuel; Brandhuber, Liene; Naumann, Johannes
Journal Article
| In: Journal of Educational Psychology | 2020
39868 Endnote
Author(s):
Eichmann, Beate; Goldhammer, Frank; Greiff, Samuel; Brandhuber, Liene; Naumann, Johannes
Title:
Using process data to explain group differences in complex problem solving
In:
Journal of Educational Psychology, 112 (2020) 8, S. 1546-1562
DOI:
10.1037/edu0000446
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-232721
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-232721
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; Problemlösen; Schülerleistung; Leistungsmessung; Geschlechtsspezifischer Unterschied; Migrationshintergrund; Computerunterstütztes Verfahren; Logdatei; Interaktion; Exploration; Verhalten; Vorwissen; Wirkung; Indikator; Leistung; Unterschied; Messverfahren; OECD-Länder
Abstract:
In large-scale assessments, performance differences across different groups are regularly found. These group differences (e.g., gender differences) are often relevant for educational policy decisions and measures. However, the formation of these group differences usually remains unclear. We propose an approach for investigating this formation by considering behavioral process measures as mediating variables between group membership and performance on the 2012 Programme for International Student Assessment complex problem solving (CPS) items. We found that across all investigated countries interactive behavior can fully explain gender differences in CPS, but cannot explain differences between students with and without a migration background. However, in some countries these results differ from the cross-country results. Our results indicate that process measures derived from log data are useful for further investigating and explaining performance differences between girls and boys and students with and without migration background. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
The structure of conflict styles in adolescents. Psychometric properties of the Adapted Rahim […]
Filsecker, Michael; Abs, Hermann Josef; Roczen, Nina
Journal Article
| In: European Journal of Psychological Assessment | 2020
39653 Endnote
Author(s):
Filsecker, Michael; Abs, Hermann Josef; Roczen, Nina
Title:
The structure of conflict styles in adolescents. Psychometric properties of the Adapted Rahim Organizational Conflict Style Inventory-II (ROCI-II)
In:
European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36 (2020) 4, S. 526-536
DOI:
10.1027/1015-5759/a000527
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-237830
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-237830
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Jugendlicher; Konflikt; Demokratische Erziehung; Konfliktlösung; Messverfahren; Modell; Messung; Unterschied; Einflussfaktor; Erhebungsinstrument; Psychometrie; Struktur; Evaluation; Faktorenanalyse
Abstract (english):
This study examines the latent structure of the Rahim Organizational Conflict Inventory - II (ROCI-II) in several samples of secondary school students. Findings from earlier studies conducted in adult populations suggested that the instrument has a four- or five-factor structure; however, the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) in this study yielded a three-factor (integrating, dominating, avoiding) solution, with most of the items associated with a fourth factor (Obliging) failing to load as predicted. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) replicated the three-factor solution satisfactorily. A multiple-group CFA indicated that the ROCI-II showed invariant measurement properties in male and female students and corroborated the concurrent validity of the three-factor solution. The integrating factor was related positively to a measure of perspective taking but negatively to a measure of reluctance to participate. The avoiding factor was associated with a measure of reluctance to participate. We discuss the implications of the results for understanding the latent structure of the ROCI-II in adolescents. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Interpretieren im Kontext virtueller Forschungsumgebungen - zu den Potentialen und Grenzen einer […]
Kminek, Helge; Meier, Michael; Schindler, Christoph; Hocker, Julian; Veja, Cornelia
Journal Article
| In: Zeitschrift für qualitative Forschung | 2020
40949 Endnote
Author(s):
Kminek, Helge; Meier, Michael; Schindler, Christoph; Hocker, Julian; Veja, Cornelia
Title:
Interpretieren im Kontext virtueller Forschungsumgebungen - zu den Potentialen und Grenzen einer virtuellen Forschungsumgebung und ihres Einsatzes in der akademischen Lehre
In:
Zeitschrift für qualitative Forschung, 21 (2020) 2, S. 185-198
DOI:
10.3224/zqf.v21i2.03
URL:
https://www.budrich-journals.de/index.php/zqf/article/view/36570
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Language:
Deutsch
Keywords:
Hermeneutik; Objektivität; Methode; Forschungsprozess; Digitalisierung; Computerunterstütztes Verfahren; Datenanalyse; Interpretation; Tool; Softwaretechnologie; Erziehungswissenschaft; Hochschullehre; Methodologie; Kasuistik
Abstract:
In dem Beitrag wird eine für die Methode der Objektiven Hermeneutik entwickelte virtuelle Forschungsumgebung vorgestellt. Mit Blick auf die Forschungsbefunde zum Einsatz von Objektiver Hermeneutik in der akademischen Lehre werden Voraussetzungen und Potentiale für die Einsatzmöglichkeiten einer virtuellen Forschungsumgebung diskutiert. Dies erfolgt unter anderem am Beispiel eines Lehrforschungsseminars, dessen erste Ergebnisse die These stützen, dass die hier vorgestellte virtuelle Forschungsumgebung eine sinnvolle Ergänzung der universitären Methodenlehre darstellen kann. (DIPF/Orig.)
Abstract (english):
The article presents the virtual research environment developed for the method of Objective Hermeneutics. With regard to the research findings on the use of objective hermeneutics in academic teaching, the requirements and potential for the possible uses of a virtual research environment are discussed. The discussion is based, among other things, on the example of a teaching research seminar, the initial results of which support the thesis that the virtual research environment presented here can be a useful supplement to university methodology, especially for Objective Hermeneutics. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Informationszentrum Bildung
From music making to affective well-being in everyday life. The mediating role of need satisfaction
Koehler, Friederike; Neubauer, Andreas B.
Journal Article
| In: Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts | 2020
39212 Endnote
Author(s):
Koehler, Friederike; Neubauer, Andreas B.
Title:
From music making to affective well-being in everyday life. The mediating role of need satisfaction
In:
Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14 (2020) 4, S. 493-505
DOI:
10.1037/aca0000261
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-230916
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-230916
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Musik; Wirkung; Gesundheit; Wohlbefinden; Singen; Musikinstrument; Zufriedenheit; Emotionaler Zustand; Selbstkompetenz; Musiktherapie; Tagesablauf; Tagebuch; Selbstbestimmung; Messverfahren; Befragung; Strukturgleichungsmodell; Deutschland
Abstract (english):
How music can provide a pathway to affective well-being has mostly been investigated with regard to listening to music or music therapy. Comparatively, less is known about the effects of active music making on well-being in everyday life or its underlying mechanisms. Self-Determination Theory emphasizes the importance of fulfillment of the needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness for well-being and offers a valuable framework for explaining the postulated link between music making and well-being. In the present daily diary study, 1,042 hobby musicians (age range 13 to 82 years; 65.3% female) completed online assessments of their music making, need fulfillment, and positive and negative affect each day for 10 consecutive days. Results showed that need satisfaction and positive affect were higher, while need dissatisfaction and negative affect were lower on days when participants reported music making. Multilevel structural equation models indicated that the effect of music making on positive affect was mediated by satisfaction of all three needs, with statistically significant indirect effects via autonomy and competence at both the within- and between person level, and relatedness only at the between-person level. There were no statistically significant mediation effects for negative affect. This study is the first to provide evidence for higher affective well-being of hobby musicians on days of music making. Results further suggest satisfaction of basic psychological needs as a mediating mechanism and emphasize the importance to distinguish between indicators of positive functioning (positive affect, need satisfaction) and negative functioning (negative affect, need dissatisfaction). (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildung und Entwicklung
A bias corrected RMSD item fit statistic. An evaluation and comparison to alternatives
Köhler, Carmen; Robitzsch, Alexander; Hartig, Johannes
Journal Article
| In: Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics | 2020
40510 Endnote
Author(s):
Köhler, Carmen; Robitzsch, Alexander; Hartig, Johannes
Title:
A bias corrected RMSD item fit statistic. An evaluation and comparison to alternatives
In:
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 45 (2020) 3, S. 251-273
DOI:
10.3102/1076998619890566
URL:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/1076998619890566
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Item-Response-Theory; Testkonstruktion; Modell; Frage; Antwort; Messverfahren; Statistische Methode; Evaluation; Vergleich; Bildungsforschung; Empirische Forschung
Abstract:
Testing whether items fit the assumptions of an item response theory model is an important step in evaluating a test. In the literature, numerous item fit statistics exist, many of which show severe limitations. The current study investigates the root mean squared deviation (RMSD) item fit statistic, which is used for evaluating item fit in various large-scale assessment studies. The three research questions of this study are (1) whether the empirical RMSD is an unbiased estimator of the population RMSD; (2) if this is not the case, whether this bias can be corrected; and (3) whether the test statistic provides an adequate significance test to detect misfitting items. Using simulation studies, it was found that the empirical RMSD is not an unbiased estimator of the population RMSD, and nonparametric bootstrapping falls short of entirely eliminating this bias. Using parametric bootstrapping, however, the RMSD can be used as a test statistic that outperforms the other approaches - infit and outfit, S1 X2 with respect to both Type I error rate and power. The empirical application showed that parametric bootstrapping of the RMSD results in rather conservative item fit decisions, which suggests more lenient cut-off criteria. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Unselect matches
Select all matches
Export
<
1
...
3
4
5
...
20
>
Show all
(358)