Menü Überspringen
Contact
Deutsch
English
Not track
Data Protection
Search
Log in
DIPF News
Research
Infrastructures
Institute
Zurück
Contact
Deutsch
English
Not track
Data Protection
Search
Home
>
Research
>
Publications
>
Publications Data Base
Search results in the DIPF database of publications
Your query:
(Schlagwörter: "Messverfahren")
Advanced Search
Search term
Only Open Access
Search
Unselect matches
Select all matches
Export
139
items matching your search terms.
Show all details
Detecting instruction effects. Deciding between covariance analytical and change-score approach
Köhler, Carmen; Hartig, Johannes; Naumann, Alexander
Journal Article
| In: Educational Psychology Review | 2021
41484 Endnote
Author(s):
Köhler, Carmen; Hartig, Johannes; Naumann, Alexander
Title:
Detecting instruction effects. Deciding between covariance analytical and change-score approach
In:
Educational Psychology Review, 33 (2021) 3, S. 1191-1211
DOI:
10.1007/s10648-020-09590-6
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-252368
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-252368
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Empirische Forschung; Unterricht; Wirkung; Unterrichtsforschung; Methode; Messverfahren; Lernerfolg; Variable; Prognose; Schüler; Unterstützung; Selbstwirksamkeit; Lehrer; Forschungsdesign; Datenanalyse; Modell
Abstract:
The article focuses on estimating effects in nonrandomized studies with two outcome measurement occasions and one predictor variable. Given such a design, the analysis approach can be to include the measurement at the previous time point as a predictor in the regression model (ANCOVA), or to predict the change-score of the outcome variable (CHANGE). Researchers demonstrated that both approaches can result in different conclusions regarding the reported effect. Current recommendations on when to apply which approach are, in part, contradictory. In addition, they lack direct reference to the educational and instructional research contexts, since they do not consider latent variable models in which variables are measured without measurement error. This contribution assists researchers in making decisions regarding their analysis model. Using an underlying hypothetical data-generating model, we identify for which kind of data-generating scenario (i.e., under which assumptions) the defined true effect equals the estimated regression coefficients of the ANCOVA and the CHANGE approach. We give empirical examples from instructional research and discuss which approach is more appropriate, respectively. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Lehr und Lernqualität in Bildungseinrichtungen
Improving reading rates and comprehension? Benefits and limitations of the reading acceleration […]
Korinth, Sebastian; Nagler, Telse
Journal Article
| In: Language and Linguistics Compass | 2021
41072 Endnote
Author(s):
Korinth, Sebastian; Nagler, Telse
Title:
Improving reading rates and comprehension? Benefits and limitations of the reading acceleration approach
In:
Language and Linguistics Compass, 15 (2021) 3, S. e12408
DOI:
10.1111/lnc3.12408
URL:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lnc3.12408
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Empirische Forschung; Lesen; Leseverstehen; Lesegeschwindigkeit; Leistungssteigerung; Lesekompetenz; Schulanfänger; Unterrichtsmethode; Wirkung; Validität; Messverfahren; Aufmerksamkeit; Arbeitsgedächtnis; Einflussfaktor; Grundschüler; Sprache; Forschungsstand
Abstract (english):
The reading acceleration phenomenon refers to the effect that experimentally induced time constraints can generate instantaneous improvements of reading rate, accuracy and comprehension among typical and reading impaired readers of different age groups. An overview of studies applying the fading manipulation (i.e., letters are erased in reading direction), which induces the time constraints causing the acceleration phenomenon, is provided in the first part of this review. The second part summarises the outcomes of studies using a training approach called the reading acceleration program (RAP) that integrated core principles of the acceleration phenomenon to generate persistent reading performance improvements. Our review shows ample evidence for the validity of the acceleration phenomenon, since it has been replicated across various languages and populations. However, although there are several explanatory approaches for underlying mechanisms, none of them is well substantiated by empirical evidence so far. Similarly, although generally positive effects of RAP training were reported for several languages and groups of readers, the exact mechanisms causing improved reading rates and comprehension are not well understood. Our critical discussion points out several limitations of RAP that call for further research. However, we also highlight several benefits regarding RAP's potential as an intervention approach for enhancements in reading performance. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildung und Entwicklung
Ambulatory assessment of rumination and worry. Capturing perseverative cognitions in children's […]
Kramer, Andrea C.; Neubauer, Andreas B.; Leonhardt, Anja; Brose, Annette; Dirk, Judith; […]
Journal Article
| In: Psychological Assessment | 2021
41467 Endnote
Author(s):
Kramer, Andrea C.; Neubauer, Andreas B.; Leonhardt, Anja; Brose, Annette; Dirk, Judith; Schmiedek, Florian
Title:
Ambulatory assessment of rumination and worry. Capturing perseverative cognitions in children's daily life
In:
Psychological Assessment, 33 (2021) 9, S. 827-842
DOI:
10.1037/pas0001020
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-243171
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-243171
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Kind; Denken; Wiederholung; Negativität; Kognition; Affekt; Wohlbefinden; Arbeitsgedächtnis; Leistung; Messverfahren; Validität; Psychometrie; Grundschüler; Fragebogen; Test; Smartphone; Empirische Untersuchung; Frankfurt a.M.; Deutschland
Abstract:
Rumination and worry are common forms of perseverative cognition in children. Research has started to target perseverative cognitions in the everyday life of children, however, valid measurement instruments reliably capturing rumination and worry in children's daily life are still missing. We conducted two ambulatory assessment studies validating short scales suitable for the measurement of rumination and worry in children's daily life. Results of the first study (N = 110, 8-11 year-olds, 31 days, up to 4 daily measurements) supported a unidimensional structure of the rumination scale. Rumination was associated with negative affect (but not positive affect) on the within- and on the between-person level. On the between-person level, children who ruminated more showed poorer working memory performance. In the second study (N = 84, 8-10 year-olds, 21 days, up to 3 daily measurements), findings of Study 1 were largely replicated. Moreover, we established a unidimensional worry scale in Study 2 reliably capturing worry in children's daily life. Importantly, Study 2 showed that worry and rumination share common variance but can be differentiated in children. On the within-person level, higher levels of worry were associated with higher levels of negative affect and lower levels of positive affect. On the between-person level, worry was associated with higher levels of negative affect and lower working memory performance. Altogether, findings of both studies demonstrated that the short scales had excellent psychometric properties suggesting that they are helpful tools for the assessment of rumination and worry in children's daily life.person level, worry was associated with higher levels of negative affect and lower working memory performance. Altogether, findings of both studies demonstrated that the short scales had excellent psychometric properties suggesting that they are helpful tools for the assessment of rumination and worry in children's daily life. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildung und Entwicklung
Reciprocal relations of subjective sleep quality and affective well-being in late childhood
Neubauer, Andreas B.; Kramer, Andrea C.; Schmidt, Andrea; Könen, Tanja; Dirk, Judith; […]
Journal Article
| In: Developmental Psychology | 2021
41323 Endnote
Author(s):
Neubauer, Andreas B.; Kramer, Andrea C.; Schmidt, Andrea; Könen, Tanja; Dirk, Judith; Schmiedek, Florian
Title:
Reciprocal relations of subjective sleep quality and affective well-being in late childhood
In:
Developmental Psychology, 57 (2021) 8, S. 1372-1386
DOI:
10.1037/dev0001209
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-252136
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-252136
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Deutschland; Kind; Grundschulalter; Schlaf; Qualität; Wirkung; Wohlbefinden; Negativität; Subjektivität; Affekt; Tagesablauf; Emotionaler Zustand; Messverfahren; Test; Mehrebenenanalyse; Strukturgleichungsmodell
Abstract:
High sleep quality has been associated with beneficial outcomes across the life span. Intensive longitudinal studies suggest that these beneficial effects can also be observed on a day-to-day level. However, the dynamic interplay between subjective sleep quality and affective well-being in children's daily life has only rarely been investigated. The aims of the present work were (a) to replicate findings from a prior ambulatory assessment study in this area (Könen et al., 2016), (b) to explore the effect of subjective sleep quality on well-being throughout the day, and (c) to examine the reciprocal relation between subjective sleep quality and well-being in more detail. Data from two ambulatory assessment studies with children between 8 and 11 years (N = 108/84, with assessments over 28/21 consecutive days) consistently showed that positive affect was higher and negative affect was lower after nights with better sleep quality, and that the effects of subjective sleep quality were stronger on well-being assessed in the morning compared with later in the day. Results from dynamic structural equation models revealed reciprocal effects of subjective sleep quality and positive affect. Negative affect was not consistently related to worse subsequent sleep quality after controlling for positive affect and prior night's sleep quality. Results suggest a close relation of sleep quality and positive affect, which strengthens the idea behind interventions targeting both, children's sleep and well-being. Differences between children in the dynamic interplay between sleep and affect may be important predictors of long-term outcomes. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildung und Entwicklung
Empirische Forschung zu Unterrichtsqualität. Theoretische Grundfragen und quantitative […]
Praetorius, Anna-Katharina; Grünkorn, Juliane; Klieme, Eckhard (Hrsg.)
Compilation Book
| Weinheim: Beltz Juventa | 2020
39924 Endnote
Editor(s)
Praetorius, Anna-Katharina; Grünkorn, Juliane; Klieme, Eckhard
Title:
Empirische Forschung zu Unterrichtsqualität. Theoretische Grundfragen und quantitative Modellierungen
Published:
Weinheim: Beltz Juventa, 2020 (Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. Beiheft, 66)
Publication Type:
2. Herausgeberschaft; Zeitschriftensonderheft
Language:
Englisch; Deutsch
Keywords:
Effektivität; Methodologie; Fachdidaktik; Unterrichtsprotokoll; Qualitätsentwicklung; Mehrebenenanalyse; Evaluation; Metaanalyse; Empirische Forschung; Unterricht; Qualität; Theorie; Modell; Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht; Nutzenansatz; Lehren; Lernen; Wirkung; Bildungsangebot; Nutzung; Unterrichtsforschung; Lernzeit; Messung; Messverfahren; Klassenführung; Lehrer; Schüler; Wahrnehmung
Abstract:
Ziel des 66. Beiheftes ist es, basierend auf dem aktuellen Erkenntnisstand, aber auch aus einer Meta-Perspektive heraus, zentrale theoretische und methodologische Herausforderungen des Forschungsfeldes Unterrichtsqualität zu identifizieren und eine Plattform für die dezidiert (selbst-)kritische Auseinandersetzung mit diesen zu bieten. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Personality across the lifespan. Exploring measurement invariance of a short Big Five inventory […]
Brandt, Naemi D.; Becker, Michael; Tetzner, Julia; Brunner, Martin; Kuhl, Poldi; Maaz, Kai
Journal Article
| In: European Journal of Psychological Assessment | 2020
40322 Endnote
Author(s):
Brandt, Naemi D.; Becker, Michael; Tetzner, Julia; Brunner, Martin; Kuhl, Poldi; Maaz, Kai
Title:
Personality across the lifespan. Exploring measurement invariance of a short Big Five inventory from ages 11 to 84
In:
European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36 (2020) 1, S. 162-173
DOI:
10.1027/1015-5759/a000490
URL:
https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/1015-5759/a000490
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Deutschland; Persönlichkeit; Persönlichkeitsmerkmal; Lebensalter; Kindheit; Jugendalter; Erwachsener; Alter; Einflussfaktor; Indikator; Validität; Erhebungsinstrument; Temperament; Messverfahren; Vergleich; Faktorenanalyse; Strukturgleichungsmodell
Abstract:
Personality is a relevant predictor for important life outcomes across the entire lifespan. Although previous studies have suggested the comparability of the measurement of the Big Five personality traits across adulthood, the generalizability to childhood is largely unknown. The present study investigated the structure of the Big Five personality traits assessed with the Big Five Inventory-SOEP Version (BFI-S; SOEP = Socio-Economic Panel) across a broad age range spanning 11-84 years. We used two samples of N = 1,090 children (52% female, Mage = 11.87) and N = 18,789 adults (53% female, Mage = 51.09), estimating a multigroup CFA analysis across four age groups (late childhood: 11-14 years; early adulthood: 17-30 years; middle adulthood: 31-60 years; late adulthood: 61-84 years). Our results indicated the comparability of the personality trait metric in terms of general factor structure, loading patterns, and the majority of intercepts across all age groups. Therefore, the findings suggest both a reliable assessment of the Big Five personality traits with the BFI-S even in late childhood and a vastly comparable metric across age groups. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Struktur und Steuerung des Bildungswesens
The measurement of within-person affect variation
Brose, Annette; Schmiedek, Florian; Gerstorf, Denis; Voelkle, Manuel C.
Journal Article
| In: Emotion | 2020
39994 Endnote
Author(s):
Brose, Annette; Schmiedek, Florian; Gerstorf, Denis; Voelkle, Manuel C.
Title:
The measurement of within-person affect variation
In:
Emotion, 20 (2020) 4, S. 677-699
DOI:
10.1037/emo0000583
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-dipfdocs-206192
URL:
http://www.dipfdocs.de/volltexte/2020/20619/pdf/Emotion_2020_4_Brose_et_al_Measurement_of_within-person_affect_variation_A.pdf
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Emotion; Emotionaler Zustand; Veränderung; Messung; Erhebungsinstrument; Messverfahren; Reliabilität; Validität; Qualität; Konzeption; Vergleich; Empirische Forschung; Forschungsstand; Längsschnittuntersuchung; Literaturbericht
Abstract:
The number of intensive longitudinal studies that investigate affective experiences at the within-person rather than the between-person level is rapidly increasing. This paradigmatic shift comes with new challenges, such as questions revolving around how to measure within-person affect variation or more fundamental questions about the reliability and validity of constructs at the within-person level. We provide a review of substantive research published in Emotion since 2005, which revealed that to date no consensus has been established on measurement instruments for assessing within-person affective experiences. Our review also showed that researchers who are interested in within-person affect variation sometimes rely on measurement instruments that were established at the between-person level, which we think should be reconsidered. Finally, reliability estimates of state variation have been developed but are not comprehensively reported in studies on within-person affect variation. The purpose of this article is therefore to alert the reader to these issues and to highlight relevant criteria for selecting items and measurement instruments when studying within-person affect variation in intensive longitudinal studies. We recommend establishing common standards for measuring within-person affect variation and drawing from a common pool of instruments, which would allow direct comparison of results across studies. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildung und Entwicklung
Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung von Überzeugungen Lehramtsstudierender zum Unterrichten […]
Dignath, Charlotte; Meschede, Nicola; Kunter, Mareike; Hardy, Ilonca
Journal Article
| In: Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht | 2020
40511 Endnote
Author(s):
Dignath, Charlotte; Meschede, Nicola; Kunter, Mareike; Hardy, Ilonca
Title:
Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung von Überzeugungen Lehramtsstudierender zum Unterrichten in heterogenen Klassen: Befunde zur Kriteriumsvalidität und Veränderungssensitivität
In:
Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 67 (2020) 3, S. 194-211
DOI:
10.2378/peu2020.art16d
URL:
https://reinhardt-journals.de/index.php/peu/article/view/152742
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Language:
Deutsch
Keywords:
Heterogenität; Lehramtsstudent; Schulklasse; Überzeugung; Einstellung <Psy>; Messverfahren; Fragebogen; Konzeption; Validität; Reliabilität; Berufliche Kompetenz; Behindertes Kind; Inklusion; Migrationshintergrund; Leistung; Leistungsdifferenzierung; Schulform; Modell
Abstract:
Es liegen bisher nur wenige Instrumente vor, um Überzeugungen von Lehrpersonen zum Unterrichten in heterogenen Klassen im Sinne eines breiten Inklusionsbegriffs zu untersuchen. In drei Studien wurden die Struktur und die Validität von drei Skalen zu Überzeugungen zum Unterrichten in heterogenen Klassen von Lehramtsstudierenden untersucht. Die Skalen wurden in Anlehnung an das Instrument KIESEL von Bosse und Spörer (2014) zusätzlich zur Heterogenitätsdimension Behinderung (d.h. die gemeinsame Regelbeschulung von Schülerinnen und Schülern mit und ohne sonderpädagogischen Förderbedarf) um die Heterogenitätsdimensionen Kulturelle Heterogenität und Leistungsbezogene Heterogenität erweitert. Im Rahmen mehrerer Validierungsstudien wurde die Sensitivität des Instruments mit Blick auf erwartete Gruppenunterschiede sowie auf die Veränderung durch Instruktion überprüft. Die Skalen können weiterhin zwischen verschiedenen Konstrukten, z.B. Selbstwirksamkeit, diskriminieren.
Abstract (english):
Only few instruments have been developed to assess such beliefs in teachers concerning various dimensions of heterogeneity following the wide definition of inclusion. In three studies we investigated the structure and the validity of three scales on heterogeneity beliefs. The scales were developed based on the instrument KIESEL by Bosse and Spörer (2014), adding two belief scales regarding cultural heterogeneity and performance-based heterogeneity to their scale on inclusive beliefs (i. e., teaching students with and without special educational needs within the same classroom). In several validity studies, we tested the sensitivity of the instrument regarding differences between groups as well as the assessment of beliefs development over time. Furthermore, the scales can discriminate between different constructs, for example, beliefs and self-efficacy.
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Using process data to explain group differences in complex problem solving
Eichmann, Beate; Goldhammer, Frank; Greiff, Samuel; Brandhuber, Liene; Naumann, Johannes
Journal Article
| In: Journal of Educational Psychology | 2020
39868 Endnote
Author(s):
Eichmann, Beate; Goldhammer, Frank; Greiff, Samuel; Brandhuber, Liene; Naumann, Johannes
Title:
Using process data to explain group differences in complex problem solving
In:
Journal of Educational Psychology, 112 (2020) 8, S. 1546-1562
DOI:
10.1037/edu0000446
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-232721
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-232721
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; Problemlösen; Schülerleistung; Leistungsmessung; Geschlechtsspezifischer Unterschied; Migrationshintergrund; Computerunterstütztes Verfahren; Logdatei; Interaktion; Exploration; Verhalten; Vorwissen; Wirkung; Indikator; Leistung; Unterschied; Messverfahren; OECD-Länder
Abstract:
In large-scale assessments, performance differences across different groups are regularly found. These group differences (e.g., gender differences) are often relevant for educational policy decisions and measures. However, the formation of these group differences usually remains unclear. We propose an approach for investigating this formation by considering behavioral process measures as mediating variables between group membership and performance on the 2012 Programme for International Student Assessment complex problem solving (CPS) items. We found that across all investigated countries interactive behavior can fully explain gender differences in CPS, but cannot explain differences between students with and without a migration background. However, in some countries these results differ from the cross-country results. Our results indicate that process measures derived from log data are useful for further investigating and explaining performance differences between girls and boys and students with and without migration background. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
The structure of conflict styles in adolescents. Psychometric properties of the Adapted Rahim […]
Filsecker, Michael; Abs, Hermann Josef; Roczen, Nina
Journal Article
| In: European Journal of Psychological Assessment | 2020
39653 Endnote
Author(s):
Filsecker, Michael; Abs, Hermann Josef; Roczen, Nina
Title:
The structure of conflict styles in adolescents. Psychometric properties of the Adapted Rahim Organizational Conflict Style Inventory-II (ROCI-II)
In:
European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36 (2020) 4, S. 526-536
DOI:
10.1027/1015-5759/a000527
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-237830
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-237830
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Jugendlicher; Konflikt; Demokratische Erziehung; Konfliktlösung; Messverfahren; Modell; Messung; Unterschied; Einflussfaktor; Erhebungsinstrument; Psychometrie; Struktur; Evaluation; Faktorenanalyse
Abstract (english):
This study examines the latent structure of the Rahim Organizational Conflict Inventory - II (ROCI-II) in several samples of secondary school students. Findings from earlier studies conducted in adult populations suggested that the instrument has a four- or five-factor structure; however, the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) in this study yielded a three-factor (integrating, dominating, avoiding) solution, with most of the items associated with a fourth factor (Obliging) failing to load as predicted. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) replicated the three-factor solution satisfactorily. A multiple-group CFA indicated that the ROCI-II showed invariant measurement properties in male and female students and corroborated the concurrent validity of the three-factor solution. The integrating factor was related positively to a measure of perspective taking but negatively to a measure of reluctance to participate. The avoiding factor was associated with a measure of reluctance to participate. We discuss the implications of the results for understanding the latent structure of the ROCI-II in adolescents. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Unselect matches
Select all matches
Export
<
1
2
3
...
14
>
Show all
(139)