Search results in the DIPF database of publications

Your query:

(Schlagwörter: "Psychisch Kranker")

Handbuch Schulpsychologie. Psychologie für die Schule Seifried, Klaus; Drewes, Stefan; Hasselhorn, Marcus (Hrsg.) Compilation Book | Stuttgart: Kohlhammer | 2021 41604 Endnote: Editor(s) Seifried, Klaus; Drewes, Stefan; Hasselhorn, Marcus
Title: Handbuch Schulpsychologie. Psychologie für die Schule
Published: Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2021
Publication Type: 2. Herausgeberschaft; Sammelband (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language: Deutsch
Keywords: Kompetenz; Kooperation; Schulpsychologe; Supervision; Kommunikation; Verband <Vereinigung>; Handbuch; Rechenschwäche; Sonderpädagogischer Förderbedarf; Inklusion; Intervention; Prüfungsangst; Psychisch Kranker; Lehrer; Individuelle Förderung; Differenzierung; Digitale Medien; Unterrichtsklima; Klassenführung; Soziale Integration; Gewaltprävention; Professionalität; Schulpsychologie; Geschichte <Histor>; Wissenschaftsdisziplin; Selbstverständnis; Organisation; Beratung; Schule; Qualitätssicherung; Qualitätsentwicklung; Rechtsgrundlage; Schüler; Diagnostik; Intelligenz; Begabung; Aufmerksamkeit; Konzentration; Legasthenie
Abstract: Das Handbuch Schulpsychologie bietet einen aktuellen Überblick über die Schulpsychologie in ihren wichtigsten Arbeitsfeldern und über das psychologische Wissen für die pädagogische Arbeit in Schulen. [Die] Autorinnen und Autoren [...] spannen einen Bogen von den wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen und Methoden über die Bedingungen erfolgreichen Lehrens und Lernens bis hin zur Begabungsförderung, Inklusion, Förderung bei Lese-Rechtschreib- und Rechenschwäche, Klassenführung, Schuldistanz, Gewaltprävention und Krisenintervention, Supervision und Qualitätsmanagement. Neben den Grundlagen der Schulpsychologie stehen die Lernbedingungen einzelner Schülerinnen und Schüler sowie psychologisches Wissen für Lehrkräfte und Schulen im Fokus. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments: Bildung und Entwicklung

Mindfulness and PMR as standardized session-introduction in individual therapy. A randomized […] Mander, Johannes; Blanck, Paul; Neubauer, Andreas B.; Kröger, Paula; Flückiger, Christoph; […] Journal Article | In: Journal of Clinical Psychology | 2019 38702 Endnote: Author(s): Mander, Johannes; Blanck, Paul; Neubauer, Andreas B.; Kröger, Paula; Flückiger, Christoph; Lutz, Wolfgang; Barnow, Sven; Bents, Hinrich; Heidenreich, Thomas
Title: Mindfulness and PMR as standardized session-introduction in individual therapy. A randomized controlled trial
In: Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75 (2019) 1, S. 21-45
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.22695
URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-dipfdocs-191507
URL: http://www.dipfdocs.de/volltexte/2020/19150/pdf/jclp_2019_1_Mander_et_al_Mindfulness_and_progressive_muscle_relaxation_A.pdf
Publication Type: 3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language: Englisch
Keywords: Psychisch Kranker; Angst; Depression; Aufmerksamkeit; Training; Psychotherapie; Klinische Psychologie; Intervention; Qualität; Wirkung; Vergleich
Abstract (english): Objective: There is scarce research on the effects of mindfulness in individual therapy. As many practitioners integrate mindfulness exercises into individual therapy, empirical evidence is of high clinical relevance. Method: We investigated the effects of a session‐introducing intervention with mindfulness elements (SIIME) in a randomized, controlled design. The effects of SIIME on therapeutic alliance and symptomatic outcome were compared with progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) and treatment‐as‐usual (TAU) control conditions. The sample comprised 162 patients with anxiety and depression. Results: Multilevel modeling revealed a significant symptom reduction and significant increase of alliance over the course of therapy. There were no significant time-condition interactions on outcome and alliance, indicating the comparable efficiency of all three treatment conditions. Conclusions: We found no advantage of SIIME versus PMR and TAU. Add‐on mindfulness might not improve individual therapy related to alliance and outcome. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments: Bildung und Entwicklung

Classes of depression symptom trajectories in patients with major depression receiving a […] Petersen, Juliana J.; Hartig, Johannes; Paulitsch, Michael A.; Pagitz, Manuel; Mergenthal, Karola; […] Journal Article | In: PLoS ONE | 2018 38706 Endnote: Author(s): Petersen, Juliana J.; Hartig, Johannes; Paulitsch, Michael A.; Pagitz, Manuel; Mergenthal, Karola; Rauck, Sandra; Reif, Andreas; Gerlach, Ferdinand M.; Gensichen, Jochen
Title: Classes of depression symptom trajectories in patients with major depression receiving a collaborative care intervention
In: PLoS ONE, 13 (2018) 9, S. e0202245
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202245
URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-dipfdocs-166924
URL: http://www.dipfdocs.de/volltexte/2020/16692/pdf/plos_one_2018_9_Petersen_et_al_Classes_of_depression_symptom_trajectories_A.pdf.0202245
Publication Type: 3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language: Englisch
Keywords: Psychisch Kranker; Depression; Entwicklung; Therapie; Intervention; Kooperation; Selbsteinschätzung; Fragebogen; Datenanalyse; Regressionsanalyse; Empirische Untersuchung; Frankfurt a.M.; Deutschland
Abstract (english): Purpose Collaborative care is effective in improving symptoms of patients with depression. The aims of this study were to characterize symptom trajectories in patients with major depression during one year of collaborative care and to explore associations between baseline characteristics and symptom trajectories. Methods We conducted a cluster-randomized controlled trial in primary care. The collaborative care intervention comprised case management and behavioral activation. We used the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to assess symptom severity as the primary outcome. Statistical analyses comprised latent growth mixture modeling and a hierarchical binary logistic regression model. Results We included 74 practices and 626 patients (310 intervention and 316 control recipients) at baseline. Based on a minimum of 12 measurement points for each intervention recipient, we identified two latent trajectories, which we labeled 'fast improvers' (60.5%) and 'slow improvers' (39.5%). At all measurements after baseline, 'fast improvers' presented higher PHQ mean values than 'slow improvers'. At baseline, 'fast improvers' presented fewer physical conditions, higher health-related quality of life, and had made fewer suicide attempts in their history. Conclusions A notable proportion of 39.5% of patients improved only 'slowly' and probably needed more intense treatment. The third follow-up in month two could well be a sensible time to adjust treatment to support 'slow improvers'. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments: Bildungsqualität und Evaluation