Menü Überspringen
Contact
Deutsch
English
Not track
Data Protection
Search
Log in
DIPF News
Research
Infrastructures
Institute
Zurück
Contact
Deutsch
English
Not track
Data Protection
Search
Home
>
Research
>
Publications
>
Publications Data Base
Search results in the DIPF database of publications
Your query:
(Schlagwörter: "Bewertung")
Advanced Search
Search term
Only Open Access
Search
Unselect matches
Select all matches
Export
128
items matching your search terms.
Show all details
Forschungsinstrumente im Kontext institutioneller (schrift-)sprachlicher Bildung
Mackowiak, Katja; Beckerle, Christine; Gentrup, Sarah; Titz, Cora (Hrsg.)
Compilation Book
| Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt | 2020
40628 Endnote
Editor(s)
Mackowiak, Katja; Beckerle, Christine; Gentrup, Sarah; Titz, Cora
Title:
Forschungsinstrumente im Kontext institutioneller (schrift-)sprachlicher Bildung
Published:
Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt, 2020
DOI:
doi.org/1035468/5801
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-201399
URL:
https://www.pedocs.de/frontdoor.php?source_opus=20139
Publication Type:
2. Herausgeberschaft; Sammelband (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Deutsch
Keywords:
Aktivierung; Anwendung; Auswertung; Baden-Württemberg; Bayern; Beobachtung; Beobachtungsmethode; Berufliche Kompetenz; Bewertung; Bildungsforschung; Bildungspraxis; Datenerfassung; Deutschland; Deutschunterricht; Diagnostik; Dokumentation; Empirische Forschung; Erhebungsinstrument; Erzieher; Erzieherin; Fachdidaktik; Fachsprache; Fachunterricht; Fachwissen; Feed-back; Förderdiagnostik; Förderung; Forschung; Forschungsmethode; Fragebogen; Grundschule; Handlungskompetenz; Instrument; Interview; Kind; Kindergarten; Kindergartenalltag; Kindergartenpädagogik; Kindertagesstätte; Kompetenz; Kompetenzmessung; Korrektur; Längsschnittuntersuchung; Lehramtsstudent; Lehrer; Lehrer-Schüler-Interaktion; Leitfadeninterview; Leseförderung; Lesekompetenz; Mathematikunterricht; Messinstrument; Methode; Nordrhein-Westfalen; Pädagogische Fachkraft; Pädagogisches Handeln; Primarbereich; Profession; Professionalisierung; Protokoll; Psychometrie; Qualitative Forschung; Quantitative Forschung; Reflexion <Phil>; Sachsen-Anhalt; Schriftsprache; Schule; Schüler; Schülermitarbeit; Sekundarstufe I; Software; Sprachbildung; Sprachdiagnostik; Spracherwerb; Sprachförderung; Sprachgebrauch; Sprachkompetenz; Sprachpraktische Übung; Sprachstandsforschung; Test; Testkonstruktion; Testvalidität; Testverfahren; Transfer; Unterricht; Videoanalyse; Videoaufzeichnung; Vignette <Methode>; Wissen; Wissenstest
Abstract:
Das Buch stellt sieben Verfahren vor, die unterschiedliche Facetten (schrift-)sprachlicher Bildung erfassen. Die Verfahren fokussieren unterschiedlcihe Aspekte der Sprachbildung sowie Sprach- und Leseförderung in Kindertageseinrichtungen und Schulen und adressieren unterschiedliche Zielgruppen (pädagogische Fachkräfte, Lehrkräfte, Kinder). Die Instrumente wurden im Rahmen der Initiative "Bildung durch Sprache und Schrift" (BiSS) entwickelt und primär für Forschungszwecke, jedoch auch in der Aus- und Weiterbildung von pädagogischen Fach- und Lehrkräften einsetzbar. Ein online-Anhang stellt die Instrumente sowie alle notwendigen Materialien zur Verfügung.
DIPF-Departments:
Bildung und Entwicklung
Do student ratings provide reliable and valid information about teaching quality at the school […]
Aditomo, Anindito; Köhler, Carmen
Journal Article
| In: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability | 2020
40512 Endnote
Author(s):
Aditomo, Anindito; Köhler, Carmen
Title:
Do student ratings provide reliable and valid information about teaching quality at the school level? Evaluating measures of science teaching in PISA 2015
In:
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32 (2020) 3, S. 275-310
DOI:
10.1007/s11092-020-09328-6
URL:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11092-020-09328-6
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht; Qualität; Messung; Evaluation; Schüler; Bewertung; Schülerurteil; Validität; Reliabilität; Schulklima; Einflussfaktor; Wirkung; PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; Modell; Faktorenanalyse; Empirische Untersuchung; OECD-Länder
Abstract:
Large-scale educational surveys, including PISA, often collect student ratings to assess teaching quality. Because of the sampling design in PISA, student ratings must be aggregated at the school level instead of the classroom level. To what extent does school-level aggregation of student ratings yield reliable and valid measures of teaching quality? We investigate this question for six scales measuring classroom management, emotional support, inquiry-based instruction, teacher-directed instruction, adaptive instruction, and feedback provided by PISA 2015. The sample consisted of 503,146 students from 17,678 schools in 69 countries/regions. Multilevel CFA and SEM were conducted for each scale in each country/region to evaluate school-level reliability (intraclass correlations 1 and 2), factorial validity, and predictive validity. In most countries/regions, school-level reliability was found to be adequate for the classroom management scale, but only low to moderate for the other scales. Examination of factorial and predictive validity indicated that the classroom management, emotional support, adaptive instruction, and teacher-directed instruction scales capture meaningful differences in teaching quality between schools. Meanwhile, the inquiry scale exhibited poor validity in almost all countries/regions. These findings suggest the possibility of using student ratings in PISA to investigate some aspects of school-level teaching quality in most countries/regions. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Construction and validation of a test to assess (pre-service) teachers' technological pedagogical […]
Baier, Franziska; Kunter, Mareike
Journal Article
| In: Studies in Educational Evaluation | 2020
40716 Endnote
Author(s):
Baier, Franziska; Kunter, Mareike
Title:
Construction and validation of a test to assess (pre-service) teachers' technological pedagogical knowledge (TPK)
In:
Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67 (2020) , S. 100936
DOI:
10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100936
URL:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191491X2030184X?via%3Dihub
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Deutschland; Lehramtsanwärter; Referendariat; Informationstechnologische Bildung; Unterricht; Unterrichtsqualität; Digitale Medien; Pädagogische Kompetenz; Wissen; Selbstbeurteilung; Bildungsforschung; Forscher; Bewertung; Testvalidität; Kompetenzmessung; Kompetenzentwicklung;
Abstract:
As society becomes increasingly digital, teachers must be trained to integrate technology effectively into their classrooms. Teachers' technological pedagogical knowledge (TPK), as defined in the TPACK framework, is considered an important prerequisite for effectively integrating technology. The TPACK framework has received a great deal of attention, yet few knowledge tests have been developed that directly assess TPK. However, those tests are crucial for evaluating the effectiveness of teacher education courses on technology integration. We have developed a 17-item test that covers teacher knowledge about various digital technologies as employed in teaching. Experts rated the items to represent the construct adequately. Data obtained from 245 pre-service teachers supports the test's internal structure. Concerning convergent and discriminant validity, the pre-service teachers' test scores were not related to their self-reported TPK, but to their self-reported technological knowledge. The test was sensitive to changes in pre-service teachers' TPK through teacher education courses. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
German pre-service teachers' evaluations of and reactions to interethnic social exclusion scenarios
Beißert, Hanna; Bonefeld, Meike
Journal Article
| In: Frontiers in Education | 2020
40848 Endnote
Author(s):
Beißert, Hanna; Bonefeld, Meike
Title:
German pre-service teachers' evaluations of and reactions to interethnic social exclusion scenarios
In:
Frontiers in Education, (2020) , S. 5:586962
DOI:
10.3389/feduc.2020.586962
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-231031
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-231031
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Schüler; Soziale Ausgrenzung; Ethnischer Aspekt; Lehramtsstudent; Bewertung; Reaktion; Intervention; Befragung; Szenarium; Deutschland
Abstract (english):
This study investigated pre-service teachers' evaluations, reactions, and interventions with regard to interethnic exclusion scenarios in Germany. More specifically, we focused on pre-service teachers (N = 145, 99 female, Mage= 21.34) in the role of observers of exclusion among students. Using hypothetical scenarios in which either a German or a Turkish boy was excluded by other children of his class, we assessed teachers' evaluations of this exclusion behavior. This included evaluating how likely teachers were to intervene in the situation and what they would specifically do. The aim of this research was to examine whether the origin of an excluded student represents a relevant category for teachers' evaluations of and reactions to social exclusion. In addition, we aimed to determine whether teachers include aspects related to group functioning in their considerations. The analyses demonstrated that teachers generally reject social exclusion, with female participants rejecting exclusion even more than male participants. Further, participants evaluated the exclusion of a Turkish protagonist as more reprehensible than the exclusion of a German protagonist. Regarding the likelihood of intervention, the origin of the excluded person was only relevant for male participants; i.e., they were less likely to intervene when the excluded person was German than when the excluded person was Turkish. Analyses of teachers' reasoning revealed their strong focus on inclusion as a social norm, especially in cases of interethnic exclusion. That is, when participants reasoned about the exclusion of the Turkish protagonist, they referred to the social norm of inclusion much more than when talking about the German protagonist. In contrast, aspects related to group functioning were scarcely of importance. In terms of the specific actions that participants would undertake as a reaction to the exclusion situation, no differences related to the origin of the excluded person were found. Hence, the origin of the excluded person factored into both the evaluation of the exclusion and the likelihood of intervention, but once the decision to intervene was made, there were no differences in the specific actions. The results are discussed in light of practical implications and teacher training as well as in terms of implications for future research.
DIPF-Departments:
Bildung und Entwicklung
Can you only diagnose what you know? The relation between teachers' self-regulation of learning […]
Dignath, Charlotte; Sprenger, Lara
Journal Article
| In: Frontiers in Education | 2020
40920 Endnote
Author(s):
Dignath, Charlotte; Sprenger, Lara
Title:
Can you only diagnose what you know? The relation between teachers' self-regulation of learning concepts and their assessment of students' self-regulation
In:
Frontiers in Education, (2020) , S. 5:585683
DOI:
10.3389/feduc.2020.585683
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-252165
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-252165
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Schüler; Selbst gesteuertes Lernen; Lehrer; Förderung; Lernmethode; Bewertung; Kompetenz; Wissen; Diagnostik; Konzeptualisierung; Befragung; Leitfadeninterview; Codierung; Qualitative Forschung; Grundschule; Deutschland
Abstract (english):
Self-regulation of learning (SRL) positively affects achievement and motivation. Therefore, teachers are supposed to foster students' SRL by providing them with strategies. However, two preconditions have to be met: teachers need to diagnose their students' SRL to take instructional decisions about promoting SRL. To this end, teachers need knowledge about SRL to know what to diagnose. Only little research has investigated teachers' knowledge about SRL and its assessment yet. Thus, the aim of this study was to identify teachers' conceptions about SRL, to investigate their ideas about how to diagnose their students' SRL, and to test relationships between both. To this end, we developed two systematic coding schemes to analyze the conceptions about SRL and the ideas about assessing SRL in the classroom among a sample of 205 teachers. The coding schemes for teachers' open answers were developed based on models about SRL and were extended by deriving codes from the empirical data and produced satisfactory interrater reliability (conceptions about SRL: κ = 0.85, SE = 0.03; ideas about assessing SRL: κ = 0.63, SE = 0.05). The results showed that many teachers did not refer to any regulation procedure at all and described SRL mainly as student autonomy and self-directedness. Only few teachers had a comprehensive conception of the entire SRL cycle. We identified three patterns of teachers' conceptualizations of SRL: a motivation-oriented, an autonomy-oriented, and a regulation-oriented conceptualization of SRL. Regarding teachers' ideas about assessing their students' SRL, teachers mainly focused on cues that are not diagnostic of SRL. Yet, many teachers knew about portfolios to register SRL among students. Finally, our results suggest that, partly, teachers' ideas about assessing SRL varied as a function of their SRL concept: teachers with an autonomy-oriented conceptualization of SRL were more likely to use cues that are not diagnostic of SRL, such as unsystematic observation or off-task behavior. The results provide insights into teachers' conceptions of SRL and of its assessment. Implications for future research in the field of SRL will be drawn, in particular about how to support teachers in diagnosing and fostering SR among their students.
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Who sees what? Conceptual considerations on the measurement of teaching quality from different […]
Fauth, Benjamin; Göllner, Richard; Lenske, Gerlinde; Praetorius, Anna-Katharina; Wagner, Wolfgang
Journal Article
| In: Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. Beiheft | 2020
40728 Endnote
Author(s):
Fauth, Benjamin; Göllner, Richard; Lenske, Gerlinde; Praetorius, Anna-Katharina; Wagner, Wolfgang
Title:
Who sees what? Conceptual considerations on the measurement of teaching quality from different perspectives
In:
Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. Beiheft, 66 (2020) , S. 138-155
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Empirische Forschung; Unterricht; Qualität; Messung; Schüler; Lehrer; Wahrnehmung; Bewertung; Erhebungsinstrument; Validität; Schülerrolle; Lehrerrolle; Taxonomie; Klassenführung; Vergleich; Fragebogen; Beobachtung; Selbsteinschätzung; Fremdeinschätzung
Abstract:
One puzzling finding in education research is that teachers, students, and external observers agree only marginally on their ratings of teaching quality. In this theoretical contribution, we summarize and reappraise previous findings on agreement between different raters of teaching quality. We explain these findings by thoroughly examining the instruments that have been used to measure teaching quality. Building on this, we propose a reference perspective matrix, which should be useful in explaining perspective-specific rating mechanisms behind responses to certain survey or observation items. The reference perspective matrix could thus afford a theoretical foundation for future studies on the assessment of teaching quality. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
The structure of teaching practices across countries. A combination of factor analysis and network […]
Fischer, Jessica; He, Jia; Klieme, Eckhard
Journal Article
| In: Studies in Educational Evaluation | 2020
39910 Endnote
Author(s):
Fischer, Jessica; He, Jia; Klieme, Eckhard
Title:
The structure of teaching practices across countries. A combination of factor analysis and network analysis
In:
Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65 (2020) , S. 100861
DOI:
10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100861
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-203522
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-203522
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Unterrichtspraxis; Schülerleistung; Leistungsbewertung; Faktorenanalyse; Netzwerkanalyse; Datenanalyse; Sekundäranalyse; PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; Internationaler Vergleich; Interkultureller Vergleich
Abstract (english):
Teaching practices are pivotal for student learning. Due to pedagogical traditions and national cultures, the structure of teaching practices may differ across countries. This study investigates the structure of teaching practices across 12 countries grouped into four major linguistic/cultural clusters. First, factor analysis is applied to investigate if the theoretical distinction between teacher-directed and student-centred practices is generalizable across countries. Then, network analysis is used to explore how individual classroom assessment practices relate to either teacher-directed or student-centred practices. Main findings include that: (1) teacher-directed and student-centred practices are two distinct factors across countries; (2) the overall structure and connectivity of teaching practices differs across countries, with smaller differences within linguistic/cultural clusters; and (3) assessment practices with the aim to structure and guide learning strongly relate to teacher-directed practices, whereas assessment practices with the aim to individualize instruction more relate to student-centred practices. We discuss the global patterning and implications.
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Do student ratings of classroom management tell us more about teachers or about classroom […]
Göllner, Richard; Fauth, Benjamin; Lenske, Gerlinde; Praetorius, Anna-Katharina; Wagner, Wolfgang
Journal Article
| In: Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. Beiheft | 2020
40729 Endnote
Author(s):
Göllner, Richard; Fauth, Benjamin; Lenske, Gerlinde; Praetorius, Anna-Katharina; Wagner, Wolfgang
Title:
Do student ratings of classroom management tell us more about teachers or about classroom composition?
In:
Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. Beiheft, 66 (2020) , S. 156-172
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Einflussfaktor; Faktorenanalyse; Längsschnittuntersuchung; Deutschland; Klassenführung; Wahrnehmung; Schüler; Bewertung; Geschlechtsspezifischer Unterschied; Lehrer; Schuljahr 09; Schuljahr 10; Zusammensetzung; Mathematikunterricht; Leistungsdifferenzierung; Mathematische Kompetenz; Qualität; Unterrichtsklima; Unterrichtsstörung; Indikator
Abstract:
The present study investigated whether the varying referents (i.e., teacher or student referent) of student ratings of established classroom management measures differ in their associations with compositional classroom characteristics and students' math achievement. Re-analysis of a large-scale dataset (PISA 2003) showed that classrooms with a higher proportion of male students, as well as those with lower math performance, exhibited lower scores on classroom management factors referring more to students than the teacher. These were in turn related to lower pre-adjusted math achievement of students. There were no associations with a measure referring to the teacher. Our results indicate that varying referents tap into different aspects of the classroom management process. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Evaluation of online information in university students. Development and scaling of the screening […]
Hahnel, Carolin; Eichmann, Beate; Goldhammer, Frank
Journal Article
| In: Frontiers in Psychology | 2020
40881 Endnote
Author(s):
Hahnel, Carolin; Eichmann, Beate; Goldhammer, Frank
Title:
Evaluation of online information in university students. Development and scaling of the screening instrument EVON
In:
Frontiers in Psychology, (2020) , S. 11:562128
DOI:
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562128
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-232241
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-232241
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Deutschland; Internet; Informationskompetenz; Ressource; Glaubwürdigkeit; Relevanz; Bewertung; Test; Testentwicklung; Itemanalyse; Suchmaschine; Simulation; Technologiebasiertes Testen; Interview; Erhebungsinstrument; Evaluation; Student; Rasch-Modell; Empirische Untersuchung;
Abstract:
As Internet sources provide information of varying quality, it is an indispensable prerequisite skill to evaluate the relevance and credibility of online information. Based on the assumption that competent individuals can use different properties of information to assess its relevance and credibility, we developed the EVON (evaluation of online information), an interactive computer-based test for university students. The developed instrument consists of eight items that assess the skill to evaluate online information in six languages. Within a simulated search engine environment, students are requested to select the most relevant and credible link for a respective task. To evaluate the developed instrument, we conducted two studies: (1) a pre-study for quality assurance and observing the response process (cognitive interviews of n = 8 students) and (2) a main study aimed at investigating the psychometric properties of the EVON and its relation to other variables (n = 152 students). The results of the pre-study provided first evidence for a theoretically sound test construction with regard to students' item processing behavior. The results of the main study showed acceptable psychometric outcomes for a standardized screening instrument with a small number of items. The item design criteria affected the item difficulty as intended, and students' choice to visit a website had an impact on their task success. Furthermore, the probability of task success was positively predicted by general cognitive performance and reading skill. Although the results uncovered a few weaknesses (e.g., a lack of difficult items), and the efforts of validating the interpretation of EVON outcomes still need to be continued, the overall results speak in favor of a successful test construction and provide first indication that the EVON assesses students' skill in evaluating online information in search engine environments. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Systematic reviews as object to study relevance assessment processes
Jäger-Dengler-Harles, Ingeborg; Heck, Tamara; Rittberger, Marc
Journal Article
| In: Information Research | 2020
40950 Endnote
Author(s):
Jäger-Dengler-Harles, Ingeborg; Heck, Tamara; Rittberger, Marc
Title:
Systematic reviews as object to study relevance assessment processes
In:
Information Research, 25 (2020) 4
DOI:
10.47989/irisic2024
URL:
http://informationr.net/ir/25-4/isic2020/isic2024.html
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Systematic Review; Forschungsmethode; Literaturübersicht; Informationsverhalten; Datenbank; Literaturrecherche; Relevanz; Bewertung; Entscheidung; Prozessanalyse; Erziehungswissenschaft
Abstract (english):
Introduction. Systematic reviews are a method to synthesise research results for evidence-based decision-making on a specific question. Processes of information seeking and behaviour play a crucial role and might intensively influence the outcomes of a review. This paper proposes an approach to understand the relevance assessment and decision-making of researchers that conduct systematic reviews. Method. A systematic review was conducted to build up a database for text-based qualitative analyses of researchers' decision-making in review processes. Analysis. The analysis focuses on the selection process of retrieved articles and introduces the method to investigate relevance assessment processes of researchers. Results. There are different methods to conduct reviews in research, and relevance assessment of documents within those processes is neither one-directional nor standardised. Research on information behaviour of researchers involved in those reviews has not looked at relevance assessment steps and their influence in a review's outcomes. Conclusions. A reason for the varieties and inconsistencies of review types might be that information seeking and relevance assessment are much more complex and researchers might not be able to draw upon their concrete decisions. This paper proposes a research study to investigate researcher behaviour while synthesising research results for evidence-based decision-making.
DIPF-Departments:
Informationszentrum Bildung
Unselect matches
Select all matches
Export
<
1
2
3
4
...
13
>
Show all
(128)