Menü Überspringen
Contact
Deutsch
English
Not track
Data Protection
Search
Log in
DIPF News
Research
Infrastructures
Institute
Zurück
Contact
Deutsch
English
Not track
Data Protection
Search
Home
>
Research
>
Publications
>
Publications Data Base
Search results in the DIPF database of publications
Your query:
(Schlagwörter: "Methode")
Advanced Search
Search term
Only Open Access
Search
Unselect matches
Select all matches
Export
305
items matching your search terms.
Show all details
Bildung im digitalen Wandel. Die Bedeutung für das pädagogische Personal und für die Aus- und […]
Wilmers, Annika; Anda, Carolin; Keller, Carolin; Rittberger, Marc (Hrsg.)
Compilation Book
| Münster: Waxmann | 2020
40603 Endnote
Editor(s)
Wilmers, Annika; Anda, Carolin; Keller, Carolin; Rittberger, Marc
Title:
Bildung im digitalen Wandel. Die Bedeutung für das pädagogische Personal und für die Aus- und Fortbildung
Published:
Münster: Waxmann, 2020 (Digitalisierung im Bildungsbereich, 1)
DOI:
10.31244/9783830991991
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-207627
URL:
https://www.pedocs.de/frontdoor.php?source_opus=20762
Publication Type:
2. Herausgeberschaft; Sammelband (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Deutsch
Keywords:
Ausbildung; Berufsbildung; Deutschland; Digitale Medien; Digitalisierung; Einstellung <Psy>; Elementarbereich; Erwachsenenbildung; Forschungsstand; Fortbildung; Frühpädagogik; Kompetenz; Kompetenzentwicklung; Lehrerausbildung; Lehrerbildner; Lehrerfortbildung; Literaturauswertung; Literaturrecherche; Literaturübersicht; Medieneinsatz; Methode; Qualität; Schule; Studie; Technologische Entwicklung; Weiterbildung; Wissenschaftliche Literatur
DIPF-Departments:
Informationszentrum Bildung
Teacher perceptions of learning motivation and classroom behavior. The role of student […]
Brandmiller, Cornelius; Dumont, Hanna; Becker, Michael
Journal Article
| In: Contemporary Educational Psychology | 2020
40747 Endnote
Author(s):
Brandmiller, Cornelius; Dumont, Hanna; Becker, Michael
Title:
Teacher perceptions of learning motivation and classroom behavior. The role of student characteristics
In:
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 63 (2020) , S. 101893
DOI:
10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101893
URL:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0361476X20300588?via%3Dihub
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Lehrer; Wahrnehmung; Erwartung; Schüler; Kognitive Kompetenz; Lernmotivation; Verhalten; Sozioökonomische Lage; Soziale Herkunft; Migrationshintergrund; Gender; Einflussfaktor; Ungleichheit; Schuljahr 04; Leistungstest; Eltern; Lehrer; Befragung; Statistische Methode; Strukturgleichungsmodell; Deutschland
Abstract (english):
The present study investigates whether teacher perceptions of students' cognitive skills, their learning motivation, and their classroom behavior differ according to students' socioeconomic status, immigrant background, and gender. Data from N = 4746 German fourth graders and data from their parents and teachers were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Controlling for student achievement as measured in a standardized achievement test and student motivation as measured by student and parent reports, we found that teachers overestimated the cognitive skills of high-SES students and girls in comparison to those of low-SES students and boys. Similarly, teachers perceived high-SES students, students who are not from an immigrant background, and girls as having a higher learning motivation and as having more cognitive skills. Finally, we found that teachers' perceptions of students' learning motivation and classroom behavior mediated the relationship between student characteristics and cognitive skills as perceived by the teacher. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Struktur und Steuerung des Bildungswesens
Measurement invariance testing in questionnaires. A comparison of three Multigroup-CFA and […]
Buchholz, Janine; Hartig, Johannes
Journal Article
| In: Psychological Test and Assessment Modelling | 2020
39818 Endnote
Author(s):
Buchholz, Janine; Hartig, Johannes
Title:
Measurement invariance testing in questionnaires. A comparison of three Multigroup-CFA and IRT-based approaches
In:
Psychological Test and Assessment Modelling, 62 (2020) 1, S. 29-54
URL:
https://www.psychologie-aktuell.com/fileadmin/Redaktion/Journale/ptam-2020-1/03_Buchholz.pdf
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; Item-Response-Theorie; Faktorenanalyse; Schülerleistung; Leistungsmessung; Messung; Invarianz; Validität; Statistische Methode
Abstract (english):
International Large-Scale Assessments aim at comparisons of countries with respect to latent constructs such as attitudes, values and beliefs. Measurement invariance (MI) needs to hold in order for such comparisons to be valid. Several statistical approaches to test for MI have been proposed: While Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MGCFA) is particularly popular, a newer, IRT-based approach was introduced for non-cognitive constructs in PISA 2015, thus raising the question of consistency between these approaches. A total of three approaches (MGCFA for ordinal and continuous data, multi-group IRT) were applied to simulated data containing different types and extents of MI violations, and to the empirical non-cognitive PISA 2015 data. Analyses are based on indices of the magnitude (i.e., parameter-specific modification indices resulting from MGCFA and group-specific item fit statistics resulting from the IRT approach) and direction of local misfit (i.e., standardized parameter change and mean deviation, respectively). Results indicate that all measures were sensitive to (some) MI violations and more consistent in identifying group differences in item difficulty parameters.
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Oberflächen- und Tiefenmerkmale. Eine Reflexion zweier prominenter Begriffe der Unterrichtsforschung
Decristan, Jasmin; Hess, Miriam; Holzberger, Doris; Praetorius, Anna-Katharina
Journal Article
| In: Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. Beiheft | 2020
40727 Endnote
Author(s):
Decristan, Jasmin; Hess, Miriam; Holzberger, Doris; Praetorius, Anna-Katharina
Title:
Oberflächen- und Tiefenmerkmale. Eine Reflexion zweier prominenter Begriffe der Unterrichtsforschung
In:
Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. Beiheft, 66 (2020) , S. 102-116
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Language:
Deutsch
Keywords:
Theoriebildung; Unterrichtsforschung; Begriff; Definition; Unterricht; Qualität; Struktur; Unterrichtsmethode; Effektivität; Unterrichtsgestaltung; Theorie; Modell; Pädagogische Psychologie
Abstract:
Das Begriffspaar 'Oberflächenmerkmale'/'Oberflächenstrukturen' und 'Tiefenmerkmale'/'Tiefenstrukturen' hat zunehmend EInzug in die Forschungsliteratur erhalten, soll es doch eine Brücke zur Verknüpfung von Lehren und Lernen schlagen. Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird nach einem Überblick zu den historischen Wurzeln das Verständnis der jeweiligen Begriffe zusammengefasst. Anhand von Arbeiten aus der (Fach-)Didaktik und der pädagogisch-psychologischen Unterrichtsforschung werden unterschiedliche Konzeptualisierung von Tiefenmerkmalen aufgezeigt und Befunde zur Lernwirksamkeit von Tiefenmerkmalen angeführt. Der Beitrag schließt mit Vorschlägen zur begrifflichen Schärfungen und diskutiert theoretische und empirische Desiderata bezogen auf das Begriffspaar. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Can you only diagnose what you know? The relation between teachers' self-regulation of learning […]
Dignath, Charlotte; Sprenger, Lara
Journal Article
| In: Frontiers in Education | 2020
40920 Endnote
Author(s):
Dignath, Charlotte; Sprenger, Lara
Title:
Can you only diagnose what you know? The relation between teachers' self-regulation of learning concepts and their assessment of students' self-regulation
In:
Frontiers in Education, (2020) , S. 5:585683
DOI:
10.3389/feduc.2020.585683
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-252165
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-252165
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Schüler; Selbst gesteuertes Lernen; Lehrer; Förderung; Lernmethode; Bewertung; Kompetenz; Wissen; Diagnostik; Konzeptualisierung; Befragung; Leitfadeninterview; Codierung; Qualitative Forschung; Grundschule; Deutschland
Abstract (english):
Self-regulation of learning (SRL) positively affects achievement and motivation. Therefore, teachers are supposed to foster students' SRL by providing them with strategies. However, two preconditions have to be met: teachers need to diagnose their students' SRL to take instructional decisions about promoting SRL. To this end, teachers need knowledge about SRL to know what to diagnose. Only little research has investigated teachers' knowledge about SRL and its assessment yet. Thus, the aim of this study was to identify teachers' conceptions about SRL, to investigate their ideas about how to diagnose their students' SRL, and to test relationships between both. To this end, we developed two systematic coding schemes to analyze the conceptions about SRL and the ideas about assessing SRL in the classroom among a sample of 205 teachers. The coding schemes for teachers' open answers were developed based on models about SRL and were extended by deriving codes from the empirical data and produced satisfactory interrater reliability (conceptions about SRL: κ = 0.85, SE = 0.03; ideas about assessing SRL: κ = 0.63, SE = 0.05). The results showed that many teachers did not refer to any regulation procedure at all and described SRL mainly as student autonomy and self-directedness. Only few teachers had a comprehensive conception of the entire SRL cycle. We identified three patterns of teachers' conceptualizations of SRL: a motivation-oriented, an autonomy-oriented, and a regulation-oriented conceptualization of SRL. Regarding teachers' ideas about assessing their students' SRL, teachers mainly focused on cues that are not diagnostic of SRL. Yet, many teachers knew about portfolios to register SRL among students. Finally, our results suggest that, partly, teachers' ideas about assessing SRL varied as a function of their SRL concept: teachers with an autonomy-oriented conceptualization of SRL were more likely to use cues that are not diagnostic of SRL, such as unsystematic observation or off-task behavior. The results provide insights into teachers' conceptions of SRL and of its assessment. Implications for future research in the field of SRL will be drawn, in particular about how to support teachers in diagnosing and fostering SR among their students.
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Tracking patterns in self-regulated learning using students' self-reports and online trace data
Halem, Nicolette van; Klaveren, Chris van; Drachsler, Hendrik; Schmitz, Marcel; Cornelisz, Ilja
Journal Article
| In: Frontline Learning Research | 2020
39969 Endnote
Author(s):
Halem, Nicolette van; Klaveren, Chris van; Drachsler, Hendrik; Schmitz, Marcel; Cornelisz, Ilja
Title:
Tracking patterns in self-regulated learning using students' self-reports and online trace data
In:
Frontline Learning Research, 8 (2020) 3, S. 140-163
DOI:
10.14786/flr.v8i3.497
URL:
https://journals.sfu.ca/flr/index.php/journal/article/view/497
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Selbstgesteuertes Lernen; Motivation; Lernen; Strategie; Selbstbeobachtung; Online; Lernverhalten; Verhaltensmuster; Daten; Komplementarität; Ereignis; Messung; Methode; Varianz; Student; E-Learning
Abstract:
For decades, self-report instruments - which rely heavily on students' perceptions and beliefs - have been the dominant way of measuring motivation and strategy use. An event-based measure based on online trace data arguably has the potential to remove analytical restrictions of self-report measures. The purpose of this study is therefore to triangulate constructs suggested in theory and measured using self-reported data with revealed online traces of learning behaviour. The results show that online trace data of learning behaviour are complementary to self-reports, as they explained a unique proportion of variance in student academic performance and reveal that self-reports explain more variance in online learning behaviour of prior weeks than variance in learning behaviour in succeeding weeks. Student motivation is, however, to a lesser extent captured with online trace data, likely because of its covert nature. In that respect, it is of importance to recognize the crucial role of self-reports in capturing student learning holistically. This manuscript is 'frontline' in the sense that event-based measurement methodologies using online trace data are relatively unexplored. The comparison with self-report data made in this manuscript sheds new light on the added value of innovative and traditional methods of measuring motivation and strategy use. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Informationszentrum Bildung
Using a multilevel random item Rasch model to examine item difficulty variance between random groups
Hartig, Johannes; Köhler, Carmen; Naumann, Alexander
Journal Article
| In: Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling | 2020
40525 Endnote
Author(s):
Hartig, Johannes; Köhler, Carmen; Naumann, Alexander
Title:
Using a multilevel random item Rasch model to examine item difficulty variance between random groups
In:
Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 62 (2020) 1, S. 11-27
URL:
https://www.psychologie-aktuell.com/fileadmin/Redaktion/Journale/ptam-2020-1/02_Hartig.pdf
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Rasch-Modell; Mehrebenenanalyse; Methode; Leistungsfähigkeit; Vergleichsuntersuchung; Simulation
Abstract:
In educational assessments, item difficulties are typically assumed to be invariant across groups (e.g., schools or countries). We refer to variances of item difficulties on the group level violating this assumption as random group differential item functioning (RG-DIF). We examine the performance of three methods to estimate RG-DIF: (1) three-level Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs), (2) three-level GLMMs with anchor items, and (3) item-wise multilevel logistic regression (ML-LR) controlling for the estimated trait score. In a simulation study, the magnitude of RG-DIF and the covariance of the item difficulties on the group level were varied. When group level effects were independent, all three methods performed well. With correlated DIF, estimated variances on the group level were biased with the full three-level GLMM and ML-LR. This bias was more pronounced for ML-LR than for the full three-level GLMM. Using a three-level GLMM with anchor items allowed unbiased estimation of RG-DIF.
Abstract (english):
In educational assessments, item difficulties are typically assumed to be invariant across groups (e.g., schools or countries). We refer to variances of item difficulties on the group level violating this assumption as random group differential item functioning (RG-DIF). We examine the performance of three methods to estimate RG-DIF: (1) three-level Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs), (2) three-level GLMMs with anchor items, and (3) item-wise multilevel logistic regression (ML-LR) controlling for the estimated trait score. In a simulation study, the magnitude of RG-DIF and the covariance of the item difficulties on the group level were varied. When group level effects were independent, all three methods performed well. With correlated DIF, estimated variances on the group level were biased with the full three-level GLMM and ML-LR. This bias was more pronounced for ML-LR than for the full three-level GLMM. Using a three-level GLMM with anchor items allowed unbiased estimation of RG-DIF.
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Unter welchen Bedingungen gelingt die Implementation eines Modellvorhabens zur Förderung der […]
Hartmann, Ulrike; Ehm, Jan-Henning; Höltge, Lea; Hasselhorn, Marcus
Journal Article
| In: Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft | 2020
39765 Endnote
Author(s):
Hartmann, Ulrike; Ehm, Jan-Henning; Höltge, Lea; Hasselhorn, Marcus
Title:
Unter welchen Bedingungen gelingt die Implementation eines Modellvorhabens zur Förderung der Schulbereitschaft in Kindertagesstätten? Analysen zum Zusammenspiel von individuellen Merkmalen der Fachkräfte, der Wahrnehmung projektbezogener Merkmale und dem wahrgenommenen Implementationserfolg
In:
Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 23 (2020) 1, S. 62-80
DOI:
10.25656/01:20459
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-204596
URL:
http://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-204596
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Deutsch
Keywords:
Kindertagesstätte; Modellversuch; Implementierung; Schulreife; Frühkindliche Bildung; Förderung; Umsetzung; Erfolg; Wahrnehmung; Fachkraft; Erzieher; Einstellung <Psy>; Selbsteinschätzung; Kompetenz; Wissen; Belastung; Fragebogenerhebung; Vignette <Methode>; Strukturgleichungsmodell; Baden-Württemberg; Deutschland
Abstract:
Anhand der Befragungsdaten von 184 baden-württembergischer Kita-Fachkräften wird untersucht, welche Zusammenhänge zwischen dem Im- plementationserfolg einer Reformmaßnahme und den für die Implementation bedeutsamen individuellen und projektspezifischen Merkmalen bestehen. Dabei werden anhand eines Strukturgleichungsmodells die Beziehungen zwischen den individuellen Voraussetzungen der pädagogischen Fachkräfte und ihrer subjektiven Wahrnehmung einer erfolgreichen Implementation des Modellprojektes analysiert. Die Ergebnisse implizieren, dass die Wahrnehmung projektspezifischer Merkmale (relativer Vorteil, Kompatibilität und Komplexität) nicht unabhängig von den individuellen Vorausset- zungen der pädagogischen Fachkräfte (Einstellungen, Kenntnisse und berufl. Belastung) betrachtet werden sollte. Insbesondere die Einstellungen gegenüber schulvorbereitender Zusatzforderung weisen Zusammenhänge mit allen projektspezifischen Merkmalen auf. (DIPF/Orig.)
Abstract (english):
Analyzing survey data of 184 early childhood educators, this study ex- amines relationships between a successful implementation of an early education reform in kindergarten, and various individual and project-specific characteristics. Structural equation modeling is used to analyze the relationship between individual characteristics of the educators and their perceived implementation success. Results indicate that educators' views on project-specific characteristics can be explained by taking their individual characteristics (beliefs, knowledge and occupational stress) into account. Specifically, attitudes towards the enhancement of children's school readiness relate to all project-related criteria. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildung und Entwicklung
Systematic reviews as object to study relevance assessment processes
Jäger-Dengler-Harles, Ingeborg; Heck, Tamara; Rittberger, Marc
Journal Article
| In: Information Research | 2020
40950 Endnote
Author(s):
Jäger-Dengler-Harles, Ingeborg; Heck, Tamara; Rittberger, Marc
Title:
Systematic reviews as object to study relevance assessment processes
In:
Information Research, 25 (2020) 4
DOI:
10.47989/irisic2024
URL:
http://informationr.net/ir/25-4/isic2020/isic2024.html
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Englisch
Keywords:
Systematic Review; Forschungsmethode; Literaturübersicht; Informationsverhalten; Datenbank; Literaturrecherche; Relevanz; Bewertung; Entscheidung; Prozessanalyse; Erziehungswissenschaft
Abstract (english):
Introduction. Systematic reviews are a method to synthesise research results for evidence-based decision-making on a specific question. Processes of information seeking and behaviour play a crucial role and might intensively influence the outcomes of a review. This paper proposes an approach to understand the relevance assessment and decision-making of researchers that conduct systematic reviews. Method. A systematic review was conducted to build up a database for text-based qualitative analyses of researchers' decision-making in review processes. Analysis. The analysis focuses on the selection process of retrieved articles and introduces the method to investigate relevance assessment processes of researchers. Results. There are different methods to conduct reviews in research, and relevance assessment of documents within those processes is neither one-directional nor standardised. Research on information behaviour of researchers involved in those reviews has not looked at relevance assessment steps and their influence in a review's outcomes. Conclusions. A reason for the varieties and inconsistencies of review types might be that information seeking and relevance assessment are much more complex and researchers might not be able to draw upon their concrete decisions. This paper proposes a research study to investigate researcher behaviour while synthesising research results for evidence-based decision-making.
DIPF-Departments:
Informationszentrum Bildung
Guter Unterricht - auch und besonders unter Einschränkungen der Pandemie?
Klieme, Eckhard
Journal Article
| In: Die Deutsche Schule. Beiheft | 2020
40882 Endnote
Author(s):
Klieme, Eckhard
Title:
Guter Unterricht - auch und besonders unter Einschränkungen der Pandemie?
In:
Die Deutsche Schule. Beiheft, 16 (2020) , S. 117-135
DOI:
10.31244/9783830992318
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-202334
URL:
https://www.pedocs.de/frontdoor.php?source_opus=20233
Publication Type:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Language:
Deutsch
Keywords:
Digitale Medien; Computerunterstützter Unterricht; Deutschland; Pandemie; Unterricht; Qualität; Unterrichtsinhalt; Unterrichtsmethode; Unterrichtsorganisation; Soziale Ungleichheit; Fernunterricht; Schüler; Lehrer; Individuelle Förderung; Kognitives Lernen; Aktives Lernen; Lernbedingungen; Feedback; Klassenführung; Unterstützung
Abstract:
Guter Unterricht umfasst anspruchsvolle Inhalte und Methoden sowie gute Klassenführung, Konstruktive Unterstützung und Kognitive Aktivierung. Der Beitrag diskutiert, wie diese Kriterien mit Präsenz- und "Fernunterricht" realisiert werden können. Guter Unterricht in diesem Sinne kann auch zum Abbau von Ungleichheit beitragen. Um eine "Förderfalle" zu vermeiden, d. h. die Wahrnehmung von Förderung als "Bestrafung", sollte der Diskurs über Folgen der Pandemie ganzheitlich und schulartübergreifend geführt werden. (DIPF/Orig.)
Abstract (english):
Good teaching involves challenging content and methods as well as good classroom management, constructive support, and cognitive activation. This paper discusses how these criteria can be realized with face-to-face and "distance" teaching. Good teaching in this sense can also help to reduce inequity. In order to avoid a "support trap", i. e., the perception of instructional support as a "punishment", consequences of the pandemic should be discussed holistically across school forms. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Departments:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Unselect matches
Select all matches
Export
<
1
...
3
4
5
...
20
>
Show all
(305)