Menü Überspringen
Kontakt
Presse
Deutsch
English
Not track
Datenverarbeitung
Suche
Anmelden
DIPF aktuell
Forschung
Infrastrukturen
Institut
Zurück
Kontakt
Presse
Deutsch
English
Not track
Datenverarbeitung
Suche
Startseite
>
Forschung
>
Publikationen
>
Publikationendatenbank
Ergebnis der Suche in der DIPF Publikationendatenbank
Ihre Abfrage:
(Schlagwörter: "Messverfahren")
zur erweiterten Suche
Suchbegriff
Nur Open Access
Suchen
Markierungen aufheben
Alle Treffer markieren
Export
139
Inhalte gefunden
Alle Details anzeigen
Incremental validity of online over offline reports of volitional control in predicting learning […]
Breitwieser, Jasmin; Neubauer, Andreas; Brod, Garvin
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie | 2019
41369 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Breitwieser, Jasmin; Neubauer, Andreas; Brod, Garvin
Titel:
Incremental validity of online over offline reports of volitional control in predicting learning success
In:
Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 51 (2019) 2, S. 204-215
DOI:
10.1026/0049-8637/a000219
URL:
https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1026/0049-8637/a000219
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Selbstregulation; Student; Datenerfassung; Einflussfaktor; Prognose; Lernerfolg; Methode; Messverfahren; Fragebogen; Online; Tagebuch; Logdatei; Lernziel; Wille; Selbsteinschätzung; Erhebungsinstrument; Vergleich
Abstract:
Volitionale Kontrolle ist ein integraler Bestandteil selbstregulierten Lernens und ein wichtiger Faktor zur Erklärung individueller Unterschiede in der akademischen Leistung. Unterschiedliche Erhebungsmethoden zur Erfassung volitionaler Kontrolle wurden bisher jedoch selten systematisch untersucht. Zwei gebräuchliche Methoden sind a) Offline-Fragebogen, in welchen über einen längeren Zeitraum aggregierte Lernerfahrungen erfragt werden und b) Online-Fragebogen wie etwa Lerntagebücher, die Lernerfahrungen zeitnah erfassen. Wir verglichen die beiden Erhebungsmethoden bei 96 Medizinstudierenden, die sich auf das Zweite Staatsexamen vorbereiteten. Das Erreichen selbstgesetzter Lernziele wurde mittels Logfile-Daten objektiv gemessen. Die täglichen Einschätzungen der Studierenden erklärten substantielle Varianz in der Lernzielerreichung über den Offline-Fragebogen hinaus, was für die inkrementelle Validität von Online-Erhebungen der Selbstregulation spricht. Darüber hinaus erklärten die Lerntagebuchdaten zur volitionalen Kontrolle intra-individuelle tägliche Schwankungen in der Lernzielerreichung. Die vorliegende Studie legt daher nahe, dass Lerntagebucherfassungen, obgleich aufwändig, deutliche Vorteile gegenüber Offline-Fragebogen haben. (DIPF/Orig.)
Abstract (english):
Volitional control (i. e., efforts to maintain goal striving in the face of obstacles) is an integral part of self-regulated learning and an important factor for explaining individual differences in academic performance. However, differences between the various methods for assessing volitional control have rarely been investigated. Two common methods are (a) offline questionnaires, in which respondents aggregate experiences over a longer period of time, and (b) online questionnaires such as learning diaries, which assess respondents' experiences close to the learning event. We compared these assessment approaches in 96 medical students who prepared for a high-stakes exam. Achievement of self-set learning goals was measured objectively via logfiles of students' activities on a learning platform. Daily reports of volitional control explained substantial variance in the achievement of learning goals over and above the offline questionnaire, indicating incremental validity of online assessments of self-regulation. Moreover, the daily reports of volitional control could explain intra-individual day-to-day variance in goal achievement. The current study, thus, suggests that learning diaries, albeit cumbersome, have clear advantages over offline questionnaires. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildung und Entwicklung
Analyzing the developmental relation of academic self-concept and achievement in elementary school […]
Ehm, Jan-Henning; Hasselhorn, Marcus; Schmiedek, Florian
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Developmental Psychology | 2019
39769 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Ehm, Jan-Henning; Hasselhorn, Marcus; Schmiedek, Florian
Titel:
Analyzing the developmental relation of academic self-concept and achievement in elementary school children. Alternative models point to different results
In:
Developmental Psychology, 55 (2019) 11, S. 2336-2351
DOI:
10.1037/dev0000796
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Selbstkonzept; Einflussfaktor; Schülerleistung; Grundschule; Grundschüler; Lesen; Lesekompetenz; Messverfahren; Panel; Modell; Methode; Unterschied; Leistungstest; Schulnoten; Vergleich; Längsschnittuntersuchung; Analyse; Baden-Württemberg; Deutschland
Abstract:
The association between academic self-concept and achievement is assumed to be reciprocal. Typically, the association is analyzed by variants of the classical cross-lagged panel model. Results with more recently developed methodological approaches, for example, the random intercept cross-lagged panel model, its continuous-time implementation, and the latent change score model, are not available so far. The present study aimed to test the association between reading self-concept and reading achievement with different models to evaluate whether positive cross-lagged effects can be demonstrated with the alternative models. Drawing on a sample of 2,014 elementary students from Grade 1 to Grade 4, results of alternative models yielded noticeable differences. Support for reciprocal effects between reading self-concept and reading achievement was found using the classical and the full-forward cross-lagged panel models. No such effects were found in the other models. Thus, the reciprocal effect model can be called into question for elementary schoolchildren. The results are discussed with regard to the theoretical assumptions and appropriate methodological approaches. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildung und Entwicklung
The longitudinal links of personality traits, values, and well-being and self-esteem. A five-wave […]
Fetvadjiev, Velichko H.; He, Jia
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | 2019
39222 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Fetvadjiev, Velichko H.; He, Jia
Titel:
The longitudinal links of personality traits, values, and well-being and self-esteem. A five-wave study of a nationally representative sample
In:
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117 (2019) 2, S. 448-464
DOI:
10.1037/pspp0000246
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-dipfdocs-189987
URL:
http://www.dipfdocs.de/volltexte/2020/18998/pdf/JPSP_2019_Fetvadjiev_He_The_longitudinal_links_of_personality_traits_values_and_well-being_and_self-esteem_A.pdf
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Affekt; Einflussfaktor; Kognition; Längsschnittuntersuchung; Messverfahren; Niederlande; Persönlichkeit; Persönlichkeitsmerkmal; Selbstwertgefühl; Wert; Wohlbefinden
Abstract:
[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported online in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology on Apr 4 2019 (see record 2019-18472-001). In the article, the stability model is referred to incorrectly as trait-state error model in the abstract, twice in the main body of the article, and in the Table 2 Note. Corrected versions of the fourth sentence in the abstract, the first sentence of the Analysis Outline section, and the first sentence of the Table 2 Note are provided in the erratum. The Kenny & Zautra (1995) reference has been deleted from the text and References list, and Steyer & Schmitt (1994) was added to the text and References list. All versions of this article have been corrected.] The existence of links between personality traits, values, and well-being and self-esteem is well established, but the nature and direction of these links have been less clearly understood. This study examines longitudinally the stability of traits and values, their mutual effects, and their effects on affective and cognitive well-being and self-esteem. We analyzed data from a nationally representative panel in The Netherlands, spanning 5 time points spread across 8 years (n = 5,159 to 7,021 per time point, total N = 11,890). We estimated latent state-trait models with autoregression and random-intercepts cross-lagged panel models to account for the trait-like, time-invariant stability of the constructs. Traits were more stable than values. The bidirectional effects tended to be significant, but could be distinguished by their relative size. Traits predicted values more strongly than they were predicted by values, and generally predicted well-being and self-esteem more strongly than values did. Traits predicted broad well-being (especially its affective aspects) more strongly than they were predicted by it; values, by contrast, were predicted by well-being (especially its cognitive aspects and self-esteem) more strongly than they predicted it. The findings highlight the central role of traits for personality functioning, while also supporting the mutual constitution of traits and other personality concepts. The results are discussed in the framework of different theoretical approaches to the composition of the broader personality system. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
The impact of linguistic similarity on cross-cultural comparability of students' perceptions of […]
Fischer, Jessica; Praetorius, Anna-Katharina; Klieme, Eckhard
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability | 2019
39120 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Fischer, Jessica; Praetorius, Anna-Katharina; Klieme, Eckhard
Titel:
The impact of linguistic similarity on cross-cultural comparability of students' perceptions of teaching quality
In:
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 31 (2019) 2, S. 201-220
DOI:
10.1007/s11092-019-09295-7
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-190654
URL:
http://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-190654
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; Unterricht; Qualität; Messung; Schüler; Wahrnehmung; Daten; Interkultureller Vergleich; Klassenführung; Kognitives Lernen; Sprache; Einflussfaktor; Messverfahren; Kulturdifferenz; Sprachproblem; Frage; Antwort; Testauswertung; Validität; Reliabilität; Vergleichende Bildungsforschung; Macau; Schanghai; Taipei; England; Schottland; Irland; Frankreich; Belgien; Schweiz; Österreich; Deutschland; Mexiko; Kolumbien
Abstract (english):
Valid cross-country comparisons of student learning and pivotal factors contributing to it, such as teaching quality, offer the possibility to learn from outstandingly effective educational systems across the world and to improve learning in classrooms by providing policy relevant information. Yet, it often remains unclear whether the instruments used in international large-scale assessments work similarly across different cultural and linguistic groups, and thus can be used for comparing them. Using PISA 2012 data, we investigated data comparability of three teaching quality dimensions, namely student support, classroom management, and cognitive activation using a newly developed psychometric approach, namely alignment. Focusing on 15 countries, grouped into five linguistic clusters, we secondly assessed the impact of linguistic similarity on data comparability. Main findings include that (1) comparability of teaching quality measures is limited when comparing linguistically diverse countries; (2) the level of comparability varies across dimensions; (3) linguistic similarity considerably enhances the degree of comparability, except across the Chinese-speaking countries. Our study illustrates new and more flexible possibilities to test for data comparability and outlines the importance to consider cultural and linguistic differences when comparing teaching-related measures across groups. We discuss possible sources of lacking data comparability and implications for comparative educational research. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Cross-cultural comparability of noncognitive constructs in TIMSS and PISA
He, Jia; Barrera-Pedemonte, Fabian; Buchholz, Janine
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Assessment in Education | 2019
38403 Endnote
Autor*innen:
He, Jia; Barrera-Pedemonte, Fabian; Buchholz, Janine
Titel:
Cross-cultural comparability of noncognitive constructs in TIMSS and PISA
In:
Assessment in Education, 26 (2019) 4, S. 369-385
DOI:
10.1080/0969594X.2018.1469467
URL:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1469467
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; TIMSS <Third International Mathematics and Science Study>; Schülerleistung; Leistungsmessung; Mathematikunterricht; Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht; Freude; Motivation; Schule; Identifikation <Psy>; Sekundarstufe I; Schüler; Messverfahren; Vergleich; Item-Response-Theory; Faktorenanalyse; OECD-Länder
Abstract:
Noncognitive assessments in Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study share certain similarities and provide complementary information, yet their comparability is seldom checked and convergence not sought. We made use of student self-report data of Instrumental Motivation, Enjoyment of Science and Sense of Belonging to School targeted in both surveys in 29 overlapping countries to (1) demonstrate levels of measurement comparability, (2) check convergence of different scaling methods within survey and (3) check convergence of these constructs with student achievement across surveys. We found that the three scales in either survey (except Sense of Belonging to School in PISA) reached at least metric invariance. The scale scores from the multigroup confirmatory factor analysis and the item response theory analysis were highly correlated, pointing to robustness of scaling methods. The correlations between each construct and achievement was generally positive within each culture in each survey, and the correlational pattern was similar across surveys (except for Sense of Belonging), indicating certain convergence in the cross-survey validation. We stress the importance of checking measurement invariance before making comparative inferences, and we discuss implications on the quality and relevance of these constructs in understating learning. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Do practical and academic preparation paths lead to differential commercial teacher "quality"?
Holtsch, Doreen; Hartig, Johannes; Shavelson, Richard
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Vocations and Learning | 2019
38707 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Holtsch, Doreen; Hartig, Johannes; Shavelson, Richard
Titel:
Do practical and academic preparation paths lead to differential commercial teacher "quality"?
In:
Vocations and Learning, 12 (2019) , S. 23-46
DOI:
10.1007/s12186-018-9208-0
URL:
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12186-018-9208-0
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Berufsschullehrer; Lehrerausbildung; Fachhochschule; Universität; Fachwissen; Fachkompetenz; Pädagogik; Wissen; Berufsschule; Unterricht; Qualität; Schulpraktikum; Test; Testkonstruktion; Bachelor-Studiengang; Master-Studiengang; Messverfahren; Validität; Reliabilität; Wirtschaftskunde; Zertifizierung; Vergleich; Multivariate Analyse; Schweiz
Abstract (english):
The Swiss teacher education and training system offers a practically and academically oriented path for aspiring commercial vocational education and training (VET) teachers. Although teachers' content knowledge (CK) and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) are considered crucial for teaching quality and students' achievement, little is known about Swiss VET teachers' Economics CK and PCK. Using assessments of teachers' economics CK and PCK as proxies of "quality" we found that teachers regardless of practical or academic preparation were similar in CK and PCK once in the teaching profession. This finding contradicts popular belief that academic preparation with its selectivity and education would produce higher quality teachers. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Construct equivalence of PISA reading comprehension measured with paper‐based and computer‐based […]
Kroehne, Ulf; Buerger, Sarah; Hahnel, Carolin; Goldhammer, Frank
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Educational Measurement | 2019
39814 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Kroehne, Ulf; Buerger, Sarah; Hahnel, Carolin; Goldhammer, Frank
Titel:
Construct equivalence of PISA reading comprehension measured with paper‐based and computer‐based assessments
In:
Educational Measurement, 38 (2019) 3, S. 97-111
DOI:
10.1111/emip.12280
URL:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/emip.12280
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Einflussfaktor; Schülerleistung; Frage; Antwort; Interaktion; Unterschied; Vergleich; Item-Response-Theory; Deutschland; PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; Leseverstehen; Messverfahren; Testkonstruktion; Korrelation; Äquivalenz; Papier-Bleistift-Test; Computerunterstütztes Verfahren; Technologiebasiertes Testen; Leistungsmessung; Testverfahren; Testdurchführung
Abstract:
For many years, reading comprehension in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) was measured via paper‐based assessment (PBA). In the 2015 cycle, computer‐based assessment (CBA) was introduced, raising the question of whether central equivalence criteria required for a valid interpretation of the results are fulfilled. As an extension of the PISA 2012 main study in Germany, a random subsample of two intact PISA reading clusters, either computerized or paper‐based, was assessed using a random group design with an additional within‐subject variation. The results are in line with the hypothesis of construct equivalence. That is, the latent cross‐mode correlation of PISA reading comprehension was not significantly different from the expected correlation between the two clusters. Significant mode effects on item difficulties were observed for a small number of items only. Interindividual differences found in mode effects were negatively correlated with reading comprehension, but were not predicted by basic computer skills or gender. Further differences between modes were found with respect to the number of missing values.
Abstract (english):
For many years, reading comprehension in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) was measured via paper‐based assessment (PBA). In the 2015 cycle, computer‐based assessment (CBA) was introduced, raising the question of whether central equivalence criteria required for a valid interpretation of the results are fulfilled. As an extension of the PISA 2012 main study in Germany, a random subsample of two intact PISA reading clusters, either computerized or paper‐based, was assessed using a random group design with an additional within‐subject variation. The results are in line with the hypothesis of construct equivalence. That is, the latent cross‐mode correlation of PISA reading comprehension was not significantly different from the expected correlation between the two clusters. Significant mode effects on item difficulties were observed for a small number of items only. Interindividual differences found in mode effects were negatively correlated with reading comprehension, but were not predicted by basic computer skills or gender. Further differences between modes were found with respect to the number of missing values.
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Capturing affective well‑being in daily life with the day reconstruction method. A refined view on […]
Möwisch, Dave; Schmiedek, Florian; Richter, David; Brose, Annette
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Journal of Happiness Studies | 2019
39084 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Möwisch, Dave; Schmiedek, Florian; Richter, David; Brose, Annette
Titel:
Capturing affective well‑being in daily life with the day reconstruction method. A refined view on positive and negative affect
In:
Journal of Happiness Studies, 20 (2019) 2, S. 641-663
DOI:
10.1007/s10902-018-9965-3
URL:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10902-018-9965-3
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Alltag; Wohlbefinden; Zufriedenheit; Emotionaler Zustand; Freude; Messung; Messverfahren; Stress; Angst; Tagesablauf; Veränderung; Unterschied; Indikator; Modell; Panel; Strukturgleichungsmodell; Deutschland
Abstract:
In the last years, there has been a shift from traditional measurements of affective well-being to approaches such as the day reconstruction method (DRM). While the traditional approaches often assess trait level differences in well-being, the DRM allows examining affective dynamics in everyday contexts. The latter may ultimately explain why some people feel more happy than others (e.g., because they experience more gratification during everyday experiences). Even though DRM research has increased in the last years, little is known about the structure of affective well-being in everyday life, and potential structural differences of affect at the within- and between-person level have rarely been considered. We thus thoroughly examined the structure of affective well-being in daily life, using data from a nationally representative sample (N = 2401) of the German Socioeconomic Panel Innovation Sample that were obtained with the DRM. Multilevel structural equation models revealed that (1) affective well-being in daily life cannot be reduced to the two global dimensions positive and negative affect (PA and NA) but that the structure of NA is more nuanced; (2) the emerging subfacets of NA have distinct associations with global indicators of well-being (e.g., life satisfaction); (3) there are structural differences of affective well-being at the within- and between-person level, and (4) the relationships between affect subfacets and activities such as "work" can be opposed at the within- and between-person level. These results show that a more differentiated view on the structure of affect contributes to a better understanding of affective well-being in everyday life. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildung und Entwicklung
Instruktionssensitivität von Tests und Items
Naumann, Alexander; Musow, Stephanie; Aichele, Christine; Hochweber, Jan; Hartig, Johannes
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft | 2019
38407 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Naumann, Alexander; Musow, Stephanie; Aichele, Christine; Hochweber, Jan; Hartig, Johannes
Titel:
Instruktionssensitivität von Tests und Items
In:
Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 22 (2019) 1, S. 181-202
DOI:
10.1007/s11618-018-0832-0
URL:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11618-018-0832-0
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Deutsch
Schlagwörter:
Unterricht; Effektivität; Schülerleistung; Leistungsmessung; Test; Messverfahren; Empirische Forschung; Konzeption; Validität; Daten; Interpretation; Psychometrie; Item-Response-Theory; Modell
Abstract:
Testergebnisse von Schülerinnen und Schülern dienen regelmäßig als ein zentrales Kriterium für die Beurteilung der Effektivität von Schule und Unterricht. Gültige Rückschlüsse über Schule und Unterricht setzen voraus, dass die eingesetzten Testinstrumente mögliche Effekte des Unterrichts auffangen können, also instruktionssensitiv sind. Jedoch wird diese Voraussetzung nur selten empirisch überprüft. Somit bleibt mitunter unklar, ob ein Test nicht instruktionssensitiv oder ein Unterricht nicht effektiv war. Die Klärung dieser Frage erfordert die empirische Untersuchung der Instruktionssensitivität der eingesetzten Tests und Items. Während die Instruktionssensitivität in den USA bereits seit Langem diskutiert wird, findet das Konzept im deutschsprachigen Diskurs bislang nur wenig Beachtung. Unsere Arbeit zielt daher darauf ab, das Konzept Instruktionssensitivität in den deutschsprachigen Diskurs über schulische Leistungsmessung einzubetten. Dazu werden drei Themenfelder behandelt, (a) der theoretische Hintergrund des Konzepts Instruktionssensitivität, (b) die Messung von Instruktionssensitivität sowie (c) die Identifikation von weiteren Forschungsbedarfen. (DIPF/Orig.)
Abstract (english):
Students' performance in assessments is regularly attributed to more or less effective teaching. Valid interpretation requires that outcomes are affected by instruction to a significant degree. Hence, instruments need to be capable of detecting effects of instruction, that is, instruments need to be instructionally sensitive. However, empirical investigation of the instructional sensitivity of tests and items is seldom in practice. In consequence, in many cases, it remains unclear whether teaching was ineffective or the instrument was insensitive. While there is a living discussion on the instructional sensitivity of tests and items in the USA, the concept of instructional sensitivity is rather unknown in German-speaking countries. Thus, the present study aims at (a) introducing the concept of instructional sensitivity, (b) providing an overview on current approaches of measuring instructional sensitivity, and (c) identifying further research directions. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Sensitivity of test items to teaching quality
Naumann, Alexander; Rieser, Svenja; Musow, Stephanie; Hochweber, Jan; Hartig, Johannes
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Learning and Instruction | 2019
38989 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Naumann, Alexander; Rieser, Svenja; Musow, Stephanie; Hochweber, Jan; Hartig, Johannes
Titel:
Sensitivity of test items to teaching quality
In:
Learning and Instruction, 60 (2019) , S. 41-53
DOI:
10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.11.002
URL:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475217307065?via%3Dihub
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Leistungstest; Testkonstruktion; Unterricht; Qualität; Einflussfaktor; Testauswertung; Grundschule; Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht; Aktives Lernen; Entdeckendes Lernen; Unterrichtsmethode; Wirkung; Messverfahren; Testaufgabe; Problemlösen; Grundschüler; Dauer; Antwort; Schwierigkeit; Datenanalyse; Interpretation; Quasi-Experiment; Deutschland
Abstract:
Instructional sensitivity is the psychometric capacity of tests or single items of capturing effects of classroom instruction. Yet, current item sensitivity measures' relationship to (a) actual instruction and (b) overall test sensitivity is rather unclear. The present study aims at closing these gaps by investigating test and item sensitivity to teaching quality, reanalyzing data from a quasi-experimental intervention study in primary school science education (1026 students, 53 classes, Mage = 8.79 years, SDage = 0.49, 50% female). We examine (a) the correlation of item sensitivity measures and the potential for cognitive activation in class and (b) consequences for test score interpretation when assembling tests from items varying in their degree of sensitivity to cognitive activation. Our study (a) provides validity evidence that item sensitivity measures may be related to actual classroom instruction and (b) points out that inferences on teaching drawn from test scores may vary due to test composition. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Markierungen aufheben
Alle Treffer markieren
Export
<
1
...
3
4
(aktuell)
5
...
14
>
Alle anzeigen
(139)