Detailansicht
Detailansicht Treffer
https://www.dipf.de/de/forschung/publikationen/publikationendatenbank/detail
https://www.dipf.de/@@site-logo/header_dipf_logo_2lines_de_2018.png
Publikationendatenbank
Treffer anzeigen
Autor:
Naumann, Johannes;
Goldhammer, Frank:
Titel:
Time-on-task effects in digital reading are non-linear and moderated by persons' skills and tasks' demands
Quelle:
In: Learning and Individual Differences,
53
(2017)
, 1-16
Sprache:
Englisch
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Schlagwörter:
Digitale Medien,
Hypertext,
Internationaler Vergleich,
Kognitive Prozesse,
Leistungsmessung,
Lesekompetenz,
Lesen,
Leseverstehen,
Modell,
OECD-Länder,
PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment),
Problemlösen,
Schülerleistung,
Technologiebasiertes Testen,
Testaufgabe,
Testkonstruktion,
Wirkung,
Zeit
Abstract(original):
Time-on-task effects on response accuracy in digital reading tasks were examined using PISA 2009 data (N = 34,062, 19 countries/economies). As a baseline, task responses were explained by time on task, tasks' easiness, and persons' digital reading skill (Model 1). Model 2 added a quadratic time-on-task effect, persons' comprehension skill and tasks' navigation demands as predictors. In each country, linear and quadratic time-on-task effects were moderated by person and task characteristics. Strongly positive linear time-on-task effects were found for persons being poor digital readers (Model 1) and poor comprehenders (Model 2), which decreased with increasing skill. Positive linear time-on-task effects were found for hard tasks (Model 1) and tasks high in navigation demands (Model 2). For easy tasks and tasks low in navigation demands, the time-on-task effects were negative, or close to zero, respectively. A negative quadratic component of the time-on-task effect was more pronounced for strong comprehenders, while the linear component was weaker. Correspondingly, for tasks high in navigation demands the negative quadratic component to the time-on-task effect was weaker, and the linear component was stronger. These results are in line with a dual-processing account of digital reading that distinguishes automatic reading components from resource-demanding regulation and navigation processes. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Notizen: