Logo: Deutsches Institut für Internationale Pädagogische Forschung

Forschung

Publikationendatenbank

Treffer anzeigen

Autor:
Wachsmuth, Henning; Naderi, Nona; Habernal, Ivan; Hou, Yufang; Hirst, Graeme; Gurevych, Iryna; Stein, Benno:

Titel:
Argumentation quality assessment
Theory vs. practice

Quelle:
In: Association for Computational Linguistics (Hrsg.): The 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2017) Stroudsburg, PA : Association for Computational Linguistics (2017) , 250-255

URL des Volltextes:
https://aclanthology.info/pdf/P/P17/P17-2039.pdf

Sprache:
Englisch

Dokumenttyp:
4. Beiträge in Sammelwerken; Tagungsband/Konferenzbeitrag/Proceedings

Schlagwörter:
Computerlinguistik, Argumentation, Diskussion, Qualität, Bewertung, Theorie, Praxis, Vergleich


Abstract(original):
Argumentation quality is viewed differently in argumentation theory and in practical assessment approaches. This paper studies to what extent the views match empirically. We find that most observations on quality phrased spontaneously are in fact adequately represented by theory. Even more, relative comparisons of arguments in practice correlate with absolute quality ratings based on theory. Our results clarify how the two views can learn from each other. (DIPF/Orig.)


DIPF-Abteilung:
Informationszentrum Bildung

Notizen:

zuletzt verändert: 11.11.2016