Menü Überspringen
Kontakt
Presse
Deutsch
English
Not track
Datenverarbeitung
Suche
Anmelden
DIPF aktuell
Forschung
Infrastrukturen
Institut
Zurück
Kontakt
Presse
Deutsch
English
Not track
Datenverarbeitung
Suche
Startseite
>
Forschung
>
Publikationen
>
Publikationendatenbank
Ergebnis der Suche in der DIPF Publikationendatenbank
Ihre Abfrage:
(Schlagwörter: "Wohlbefinden")
zur erweiterten Suche
Suchbegriff
Nur Open Access
Suchen
Markierungen aufheben
Alle Treffer markieren
Export
73
Inhalte gefunden
Alle Details anzeigen
Belonging as compensator. Social belonging moderates the relation between bullying and well-being […]
Marksteiner, Tamara; Janson, Marc Philipp; Beißert, Hanna
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie | 2020
42388 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Marksteiner, Tamara; Janson, Marc Philipp; Beißert, Hanna
Titel:
Belonging as compensator. Social belonging moderates the relation between bullying and well-being worldwide
In:
Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 52 (2020) 3/4, S. 116-126
DOI:
10.1026/0049-8637/a000221
URL:
https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1026/0049-8637/a000221
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Schüler; Jugendlicher; Soziale Beziehung; Soziale Integration; Mobbing; Wirkung; Wohlbefinden; Zufriedenheit; PISA <Programme for International Student Assessment>; Datenanalyse; Mehrebenenanalyse; Regressionsanalyse; Faktorenanalyse; Empirische Untersuchung
Abstract:
Mobbing ist ein ernstes Problem bei Jugendlichen weltweit. Es wird als eine Art physische oder indirekte Peer-Viktimisierung verstanden, die im Laufe der Zeit wiederholt auftritt und durch einen systematischen Machtmissbrauch gekennzeichnet ist. Gemobbt zu werden beeinträchtigt die Gesundheit und das Wohlbefinden der Opfer erheblich. Was schützt die Schüler vor diesen Folgen? Wir untersuchen Zugehörigkeitsgefühle - d.h. das Gefühl, im jeweiligen sozialen Umfeld akzeptiert, einbezogen, respektiert und geschätzt zu werden - als möglichen Kompensator für Mobbing-Konsequenzen in verschiedenen Kulturen. Wir nehmen an, dass es für Schüler mit starkem Zugehörigkeitsgefühl weniger schwerwiegend ist, gemobbt zu werden. Wir verwenden Daten von N = 319.057 15-jährigen Schülern aus 47 Ländern. Mehrebenen-Regressionsanalysen zeigen, dass Mobbing und Wohlbefinden negativ korrelieren. Darüber hinaus zeigen die Ergebnisse erwartungsgemäß, dass Zugehörigkeitsgefühle die negativen Auswirkungen von Mobbing auf das Wohlbefinden kompensieren. Praktische Implikationen sowie Einschränkungen werden diskutiert. (DIPF/Orig.)
Abstract (english):
Bullying is a serious issue among adolescents worldwide. It has been conceptualized as a type of physical or indirect peer victimization that occurs repeatedly over time and is characterized by a systematic abuse of power. Being bullied at school severely affects victims' health and well-being. What protects students from these consequences? We investigate feelings of belonging -i. e., the feeling that one is accepted, included, respected, and valued in the respective social environment - as a possible compensator for bullying consequences across different cultures. We hypothesize that being bullied is less severe for students who have strong feelings of belonging. We use data from 319,057 15-year-old students across 47 countries. Multilevel regression analyses replicated that bullying and well-being are negatively associated. Further, the results indicated, as expected, that feelings of belonging compensate for the negative impact that bullying has on well-being. Practical implications as well as limitations are discussed. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildung und Entwicklung
Students' social, emotional and intercultural competencies and their development in school settings
Mornar, Mirta; Matić Bojić, Jelena; Odak, Iva; Eliasson, Nina; Gøtzsche, Katinka; Jurko, Lana; […]
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Šolsko polje | 2020
40961 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Mornar, Mirta; Matić Bojić, Jelena; Odak, Iva; Eliasson, Nina; Gøtzsche, Katinka; Jurko, Lana; Kozina, Ana; Ojsteršek, Aleš; Sälzer, Christine; Veldin, Manja; Vieluf, Svenja
Titel:
Students' social, emotional and intercultural competencies and their development in school settings
In:
Šolsko polje, 31 (2020) 3/4, S. 115-137
DOI:
10.32320/1581-6044.31(3-4)115-137
URL:
https://www.pei.si/ISSN/1581_6044/3-4-2020/1581-6044.31(3-4)115-137.pdf
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Schüler; Schülerin; Emotionale Kompetenz; Interkulturelle Kompetenz; Soziale Kompetenz; Wohlbefinden; Schulerfolg; Schülerleistung; Literaturbericht; Schule; Förderung; Intervention; Selbstwertgefühl; Respekt; Zwischenmenschliche Beziehung; Unterrichtsmethode; Unterrichtsorganisation; Wirkung
Abstract (english):
As the field of social and emotional learning has developed and grown over the last decades, so too has the number of different programmes seek-ing to achieve various SEL goals, resulting in a significant body of research on the topic. Meanwhile, there has also been an increase in the number of programmes aimed at developing intercultural competencies. For the pur-pose of developing a new programme for social and emotional learning, we reviewed the key characteristics of existing evidence-based social, emo-tional and intercultural learning programmes, including their theoretical and conceptual backgrounds, content, methodological and organisation-al aspects, and their evaluation. This review has revealed multiple similar-ities between these two approaches (i.e. social and emotional and intercul-tural), presenting a rationale for their integration. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
What do you (think you) need? Perceived vs. experienced effects of need fulfillment on well-being
Neubauer, Andreas B.; Lerche, Veronika; Koehler, Friederike; Voss, Andreas
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Journal of Research in Personality | 2020
39959 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Neubauer, Andreas B.; Lerche, Veronika; Koehler, Friederike; Voss, Andreas
Titel:
What do you (think you) need? Perceived vs. experienced effects of need fulfillment on well-being
In:
Journal of Research in Personality, 86 (2020) , S. 103938
DOI:
10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103938
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-dipfdocs-204966
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-dipfdocs-204966
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Bedürfnisbefriedigung; Grundbedürfnis; Frustration; Wirkung; Wohlbefinden; Emotion; Individuum; Unterschied; Vergleichsuntersuchung; Selbstbeobachtung; Tagebuch; Selbstbestimmungstheorie
Abstract (english):
We compared two approaches towards assessing inter-individual differences in the effect of satisfaction and frustration of basic needs (autonomy, competence, relatedness) on well-being: perceived need effects (beliefs about the effect of need fulfillment on one's well-being) and experienced need effects (the within-person coupling of need fulfillment and well-being). In two studies (total N = 1281), participants reported perceived need effects in a multidimensional way. In Study 2, daily need fulfillment and affective well-being were additionally assessed (daily-diary study; ten days). Associations between perceived and experienced need effects were significant (albeit small) for all three frustration dimensions, but only for one satisfaction dimension (relatedness), suggesting that they capture different constructs and might be related to different outcomes. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildung und Entwicklung
Studying within-person variation and within-person couplings in intensive longitudinal data. […]
Neubauer, Andreas B.; Schmiedek, Florian
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Gerontology | 2020
40288 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Neubauer, Andreas B.; Schmiedek, Florian
Titel:
Studying within-person variation and within-person couplings in intensive longitudinal data. Lessons learned and to be learned
In:
Gerontology, 66 (2020) 4, S. 332-339
DOI:
10.1159/000507993
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-dipfdocs-252201
URL:
https://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2022/25220/pdf/Gerontology_66_4_2020_Neubauer_et_al_Studying_within-person_variation_A.pdf
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Altersforschung; Psychologische Forschung; Altern; Wohlbefinden; Messung; Messverfahren; Längsschnittuntersuchung; Reliabilität; Heterogenität; Kausalität; Zeitpunkt; Diskussion
Abstract (english):
Intensive longitudinal designs (e.g., experience sampling methods, daily diary studies, or ambulatory assessments) continue to gain importance in sychological aging research. Empirical research using these designs has greatly facilitated our understanding of short-term within-person processes and has started to approach the question how these processes shape long-term development across the life span. The aim of this viewpoint article is to point out four key issues in intensive longitudinal designs that in our opinion require more attention than they are currently given: (a) improvement in measurement reliability, (b) the necessity to investigate inter-individual differences in short-term dynamics, (c) considerations of the time scale across which dynamic effects unfold, and (d) targeting causality by incorporating experimental methods in intensive longitudinal designs. We illustrate these four key issues by referring to a prominent example of within-person dynamics in prior empirical research: the within-person coupling of stressor occurrence and well-being stress reactivity).
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildung und Entwicklung
How was your day? Convergence of aggregated momentary and retrospective end-of-day affect ratings […]
Neubauer, Andreas B.; Scott, Stacey B.; Sliwinski, Martin J.; Smyth, Joshua M.
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | 2020
39211 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Neubauer, Andreas B.; Scott, Stacey B.; Sliwinski, Martin J.; Smyth, Joshua M.
Titel:
How was your day? Convergence of aggregated momentary and retrospective end-of-day affect ratings across the adult life span
In:
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119 (2020) 1, S. 185-203
DOI:
10.1037/pspp0000248
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-dipfdocs-228882
URL:
http://www.dipfdocs.de/volltexte/2021/22888/pdf/JPSP_2020_1_Neubauer_et_al_How_was_your_day_A.pdf
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Wohlbefinden; Stress; Emotionaler Zustand; Altersgruppe; Erwachsener; Unterschied; Erinnerung; Gedächtnis; Tagesablauf; Tagebuch; Indikator; Gegenwart; Vergangenheit; Messverfahren; Befragung; Vergleich; USA
Abstract (english):
Daily diary studies and experience sampling studies examine day-to-day variations in affect using different rating types: The former typically collect retrospective affect reports at the end of the day, whereas the latter collects multiple momentary assessments across the day. The present study examined the convergence of (aggregated) momentary assessments collected repeatedly within a day and retrospective assessments collected at the end of the day. Building on prior research on the memory-experience gap and the peak-and-end rule we predicted that participants would report more intense retrospective affect than aggregated momentary affect, and that retrospective affect would be biased toward the peak and the most recent affect of the day. Based on socioemotional selectivity theory and the strength and vulnerability integration model, age differences in these convergence indicators were expected. Findings from 2 age-heterogeneous ecological momentary assessment/daily diary hybrid studies (N = 242, 25-65 years; and N = 175, 20-79 years) revealed (a) a memory-experience gap for negative affect (more intense retrospective ratings than aggregated momentary ratings) that is attenuated with advancing age; (b) only a small memory-experience gap for positive affect for very old adults (66-79 years), but not younger adults; (c) relatively high convergence of aggregated momentary ratings and retrospective ratings despite (d) small biases of retrospective negative affect ratings toward peak and most recent negative affect. Findings suggest that both rating types can discriminate "good days" from "bad days" and provide overlapping but not necessarily exchangeable information. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildung und Entwicklung
The bright and the dark side of peer relationships. Differential effects of relatedness […]
Schmidt, Andrea; Neubauer, Andreas B.; Dirk, Judith; Schmiedek, Florian
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Developmental Psychology | 2020
40172 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Schmidt, Andrea; Neubauer, Andreas B.; Dirk, Judith; Schmiedek, Florian
Titel:
The bright and the dark side of peer relationships. Differential effects of relatedness satisfaction and frustration at school on affective well-being in children's daily lives
In:
Developmental Psychology, 56 (2020) 8, S. 1532-1546
DOI:
10.1037/dev0000997
URL:
https://content.apa.org/fulltext/2020-34331-001.pdf
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Gleichaltriger; Beziehung; Bedürfnis; Gefühlsleben; Wohlbefinden; Selbstbestimmung; Theorie; Schule; Tagebuch; Grundschule; Schüler; Schuljahr 04; Schuljahr 05; Schuljahr 06; Empirische Untersuchung; Frankfurt am Main; Deutschland
Abstract (english):
Satisfaction and frustration of the basic psychological need for relatedness have been postulated to play a vital role for affective well-being. Yet, this prediction has not been thoroughly tested in school children's everyday lives. In this work, we examined the association between relatedness satisfaction and frustration at school on daily and average positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA) using ambulatory assessment in three intensive longitudinal studies with children aged 9-12 (total N = 317). In Study 1, fourth to sixth graders reported their PA and NA two times daily and their relatedness satisfaction and frustration once a day for two weeks. In Study 2 (Study 3), fourth graders (fifth graders) reported their PA and NA four times daily and their relatedness satisfaction and frustration once a day for four weeks. Across the three studies, relatedness satisfaction and frustration were psychometrically separable and exhibited differential effects such that relatedness satisfaction was significantly associated primarily with PA, and relatedness frustration was significantly associated only with NA at between- and within-person levels. Explaining inter-individual differences suggested that the association between daily relatedness and affective well-being was weaker for generally highly integrated children and stronger for usually rather excluded children.
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildung und Entwicklung
Migration und Bildungserfolg. Herausforderungen und Potenziale
Gogolin, Ingrid; Maaz, Kai (Hrsg.)
Sammelband
| Wiesbaden: Springer VS | 2019
39759 Endnote
Herausgeber*innen:
Gogolin, Ingrid; Maaz, Kai
Titel:
Migration und Bildungserfolg. Herausforderungen und Potenziale
Erscheinungsvermerk:
Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2019 (Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft. Sonderheft, 34)
Dokumenttyp:
2. Herausgeberschaft; Zeitschriftensonderheft
Sprache:
Deutsch
Schlagwörter:
Migration; Bildungserfolg; Schüler; Migrationshintergrund; Bildungsbiografie; Grundschule; Übergang; Weiterführende Schule; Jugendlicher; Wohlbefinden; Berufsbildung; Soziale Ungleichheit; Mehrsprachigkeit; Muttersprache; Sprachkompetenz; Bildungsaspiration; Bildungsforschung; Empirische Forschung; Deutschland
Abstract:
In den Beiträgen des Bandes geht es um die Frage, welche Ressourcen und Potenziale sich für Bildungssysteme aufnehmender Länder durch Migration ergeben. Im Gegensatz zur eher üblichen Perspektive der Bildungsforschung wird hier nicht erneut das Problem der Bildungsbenachteiligung von Migrantinnen und Migranten aufgenommen, sondern gefragt, unter welchen Bedingungen Bildungserfolg möglich ist und welche Hinweise auf die Gestaltung von Bildung sich daraus ablesen lassen. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Struktur und Steuerung des Bildungswesens
Together is better. Higher committed relationships increase life satisfaction and reduce loneliness
Bucher, Alica; Neubauer, Andreas B.; Voss, Andreas; Oetzbach, Carolin
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Journal of Happiness Studies | 2019
38757 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Bucher, Alica; Neubauer, Andreas B.; Voss, Andreas; Oetzbach, Carolin
Titel:
Together is better. Higher committed relationships increase life satisfaction and reduce loneliness
In:
Journal of Happiness Studies, 20 (2019) 8, S. 2445-2469
DOI:
10.1007/s10902-018-0057-1
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-dipfdocs-181365
URL:
http://www.dipfdocs.de/volltexte/2020/18136/pdf/Bucher_etal_2019_Together_is_better_A.pdf
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Zwischenmenschliche Beziehung; Partnerschaft; Status; Zufriedenheit; Emotion; Einsamkeit; Bedürfnis; Wohlbefinden; Selbstbestimmung; Fragebogenerhebung; Online; Datenanalyse; Längsschnittuntersuchung; Empirische Untersuchung; Deutschland
Abstract (english):
Recently, the term mingle was introduced for persons with an intimate relationship who do not define themselves as romantic partners. This study examines differences between single, mingle and partnered adults in terms of life satisfaction and loneliness. Furthermore, need fulfillment is investigated as a mediator concerning the link between relationship status with life satisfaction and emotional loneliness. Lastly, a longitudinal analysis examined whether increases in commitment lead to higher well-being. A total of 764 participants completed an online questionnaire. Mingles fell in between singles and partnered adults regarding emotional loneliness and life satisfaction. With regard to female participants, relatedness and competence need fulfillment fully mediated the link between relationship status and life satisfaction whereas the association between relationship status and emotional loneliness was specifically mediated by the relatedness and autonomy component. Finally, shifting into more committed forms of relationship increased well-being regarding the longitudinal analysis. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildung und Entwicklung
Überzeugungen von Lehrkräften, Adaptivität des Unterrichts und Lernergebnisse im Fach Englisch
Dohrmann, Julia; Feldhoff, Tobias; Steinert, Brigitte; Klieme, Eckhard
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Zeitschrift für Pädagogik | 2019
38911 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Dohrmann, Julia; Feldhoff, Tobias; Steinert, Brigitte; Klieme, Eckhard
Titel:
Überzeugungen von Lehrkräften, Adaptivität des Unterrichts und Lernergebnisse im Fach Englisch
In:
Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 65 (2019) 1, S. 56-72
DOI:
10.25656/01:23927
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-239279
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-239279
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Deutsch
Schlagwörter:
Englischunterricht; Lehrer; Überzeugung; Adaptiver Unterricht; Schulform; Schüler; Wohlbefinden; Einflussfaktor; Schülerleistung; Bildungsgeschichte; Geschichte <Histor>; Datenanalyse; 20. Jahrhundert; Hessen; Niedersachsen; Nordrhein-Westfalen; Deutschland-BRD
Abstract:
Basierend auf der Drei-Länder-Studie von Helmut Fend wurden Zusammenhänge zwischen allgemeinen pädagogischen Überzeugungen von Lehrkräften, der Adaptivität des Unterrichtshandelns und Ergebnissen von Schüler*innen (Leistung und Wohlfühlen) im Englischunterricht untersucht. Ferner wurde analysiert, ob letzterer Zusammenhang über adaptives Unterrichtshandeln der Lehrkräfte vermittelt ist. Die Ergebnisse zeigen eine Beziehung zwischen Überzeugungen und Adaptivität. Der Zusammenhang der Überzeugungen mit dem Wohlfühlen der Schüler*innen im Englischunterricht wird über die Adaptivität des Unterrichts vermittelt. Bei der Englischleistung konnte keine Vermittlung identifiziert werden. (DIPF/Orig.)
Abstract (english):
The study examines correlations between pedagogical teachers' beliefs, adaptive teaching in English lessons, and students' learning outcomes (achievement and well-being). The research question asks whether the latter connection is mediated by adaptive teaching. The study is based on the 'Drei-Länder-Studie' by Helmut Fend. The results show that pedagogical beliefs are related to adaptivity. The connection between these beliefs and the well-being of the students in English lessons is mediated by adaptivity but for the students' English achievement no mediation by adaptivity occurs. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
The longitudinal links of personality traits, values, and well-being and self-esteem. A five-wave […]
Fetvadjiev, Velichko H.; He, Jia
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | 2019
39222 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Fetvadjiev, Velichko H.; He, Jia
Titel:
The longitudinal links of personality traits, values, and well-being and self-esteem. A five-wave study of a nationally representative sample
In:
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117 (2019) 2, S. 448-464
DOI:
10.1037/pspp0000246
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-dipfdocs-189987
URL:
http://www.dipfdocs.de/volltexte/2020/18998/pdf/JPSP_2019_Fetvadjiev_He_The_longitudinal_links_of_personality_traits_values_and_well-being_and_self-esteem_A.pdf
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Affekt; Einflussfaktor; Kognition; Längsschnittuntersuchung; Messverfahren; Niederlande; Persönlichkeit; Persönlichkeitsmerkmal; Selbstwertgefühl; Wert; Wohlbefinden
Abstract:
[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported online in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology on Apr 4 2019 (see record 2019-18472-001). In the article, the stability model is referred to incorrectly as trait-state error model in the abstract, twice in the main body of the article, and in the Table 2 Note. Corrected versions of the fourth sentence in the abstract, the first sentence of the Analysis Outline section, and the first sentence of the Table 2 Note are provided in the erratum. The Kenny & Zautra (1995) reference has been deleted from the text and References list, and Steyer & Schmitt (1994) was added to the text and References list. All versions of this article have been corrected.] The existence of links between personality traits, values, and well-being and self-esteem is well established, but the nature and direction of these links have been less clearly understood. This study examines longitudinally the stability of traits and values, their mutual effects, and their effects on affective and cognitive well-being and self-esteem. We analyzed data from a nationally representative panel in The Netherlands, spanning 5 time points spread across 8 years (n = 5,159 to 7,021 per time point, total N = 11,890). We estimated latent state-trait models with autoregression and random-intercepts cross-lagged panel models to account for the trait-like, time-invariant stability of the constructs. Traits were more stable than values. The bidirectional effects tended to be significant, but could be distinguished by their relative size. Traits predicted values more strongly than they were predicted by values, and generally predicted well-being and self-esteem more strongly than values did. Traits predicted broad well-being (especially its affective aspects) more strongly than they were predicted by it; values, by contrast, were predicted by well-being (especially its cognitive aspects and self-esteem) more strongly than they predicted it. The findings highlight the central role of traits for personality functioning, while also supporting the mutual constitution of traits and other personality concepts. The results are discussed in the framework of different theoretical approaches to the composition of the broader personality system. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Markierungen aufheben
Alle Treffer markieren
Export
<
1
2
3
(aktuell)
4
...
8
>
Alle anzeigen
(73)