Menü Überspringen
Kontakt
Presse
Deutsch
English
Not track
Datenverarbeitung
Suche
Anmelden
DIPF aktuell
Forschung
Infrastrukturen
Institut
Zurück
Kontakt
Presse
Deutsch
English
Not track
Datenverarbeitung
Suche
Startseite
>
Forschung
>
Publikationen
>
Publikationendatenbank
Ergebnis der Suche in der DIPF Publikationendatenbank
Ihre Abfrage:
(Schlagwörter: "deutsch")
zur erweiterten Suche
Suchbegriff
Nur Open Access
Suchen
Markierungen aufheben
Alle Treffer markieren
Export
2682
Inhalte gefunden
Alle Details anzeigen
Zu viele Suchergebnisse
Es werden maximal 500 Treffer angezeigt. Bitte grenzen Sie ihre Abfrage in der
erweiterten Suche.
weiter ein.
German pre-service teachers' evaluations of and reactions to interethnic social exclusion scenarios
Beißert, Hanna; Bonefeld, Meike
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Frontiers in Education | 2020
40848 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Beißert, Hanna; Bonefeld, Meike
Titel:
German pre-service teachers' evaluations of and reactions to interethnic social exclusion scenarios
In:
Frontiers in Education, (2020) , S. 5:586962
DOI:
10.3389/feduc.2020.586962
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-231031
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-231031
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Schüler; Soziale Ausgrenzung; Ethnischer Aspekt; Lehramtsstudent; Bewertung; Reaktion; Intervention; Befragung; Szenarium; Deutschland
Abstract (english):
This study investigated pre-service teachers' evaluations, reactions, and interventions with regard to interethnic exclusion scenarios in Germany. More specifically, we focused on pre-service teachers (N = 145, 99 female, Mage= 21.34) in the role of observers of exclusion among students. Using hypothetical scenarios in which either a German or a Turkish boy was excluded by other children of his class, we assessed teachers' evaluations of this exclusion behavior. This included evaluating how likely teachers were to intervene in the situation and what they would specifically do. The aim of this research was to examine whether the origin of an excluded student represents a relevant category for teachers' evaluations of and reactions to social exclusion. In addition, we aimed to determine whether teachers include aspects related to group functioning in their considerations. The analyses demonstrated that teachers generally reject social exclusion, with female participants rejecting exclusion even more than male participants. Further, participants evaluated the exclusion of a Turkish protagonist as more reprehensible than the exclusion of a German protagonist. Regarding the likelihood of intervention, the origin of the excluded person was only relevant for male participants; i.e., they were less likely to intervene when the excluded person was German than when the excluded person was Turkish. Analyses of teachers' reasoning revealed their strong focus on inclusion as a social norm, especially in cases of interethnic exclusion. That is, when participants reasoned about the exclusion of the Turkish protagonist, they referred to the social norm of inclusion much more than when talking about the German protagonist. In contrast, aspects related to group functioning were scarcely of importance. In terms of the specific actions that participants would undertake as a reaction to the exclusion situation, no differences related to the origin of the excluded person were found. Hence, the origin of the excluded person factored into both the evaluation of the exclusion and the likelihood of intervention, but once the decision to intervene was made, there were no differences in the specific actions. The results are discussed in light of practical implications and teacher training as well as in terms of implications for future research.
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildung und Entwicklung
Social inclusion of refugee and native peers among adolescents. It is the language that matters!
Beißert, Hanna; Gönültaş, Seçil; Mulvey, Kelly Lynn
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Journal of Research on Adolescence | 2020
39287 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Beißert, Hanna; Gönültaş, Seçil; Mulvey, Kelly Lynn
Titel:
Social inclusion of refugee and native peers among adolescents. It is the language that matters!
In:
Journal of Research on Adolescence, 30 (2020) 1, S. 219-233
DOI:
10.1111/jora.12518
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-dipfdocs-191435
URL:
http://www.dipfdocs.de/volltexte/2020/19143/pdf/jora_2020_1_Beissert_Goenueltas_Mulvey_Social_inclusion_of_refugee_and_native_peers_among_adolescents_A.pdf
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Flüchtlingsjugend; Sprachkompetenz; Einflussfaktor; Soziale Interaktion; Peergroup; Jugendlicher; Migrationshintergrund; Inklusion; Ausgrenzung; Akkulturation; Soziale Integration; Wirkung; Gesundheit; Wohlbefinden; Kommunikation; Entscheidung; Gymnasium; Sekundarstufe I; Herkunftsland; Befragung; Syrien; Deutschland
Abstract (english):
This study investigated the role of refugee status and language skills for adolescents' inclusion or exclusion decisions in hypothetical intergroup scenarios. 100 German adolescents (Mage = 13.65 years, SD = 1.93) were presented three scenarios in which groups of adolescents are planning leisure time activities, and peers from their own country (Germany) versus another country (Syrian refugees) with either good or bad German skills want to join them. Whereas adolescents' inclusion decisions did not differ between the German protagonist and the Syrian one with good German skills, the Syrian protagonist with bad German skills was less likely to be included than either of the other two. These findings have implications for understanding the role of language in adolescents' inclusion decisions. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildung und Entwicklung
"At Home but Open" - eine erfolgreiche Umsetzung im digitalen Format. Bericht zu den […]
Bielow, Manuela; Bondesen, Madeleine; Grahl, Tina; Hagen, Florian; Müller, Katharina; […]
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: o-bib | 2020
40855 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Bielow, Manuela; Bondesen, Madeleine; Grahl, Tina; Hagen, Florian; Müller, Katharina; Oßwald, Achim; Person, Alisa; Steyer, Timo
Titel:
"At Home but Open" - eine erfolgreiche Umsetzung im digitalen Format. Bericht zu den Open-Access-Tagen 2020 in Bielefeld
In:
o-bib, 7 (2020) 4, S. 1-21
DOI:
10.5282/o-bib/5646
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-dipfdocs-233139
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-dipfdocs-233139
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Deutsch
Schlagwörter:
Open Access; Open Science; Publikation; Publizistische Vielfalt; Hochschule; Wissenschaftler; Rollenübernahme; Lateinamerika; Finanzierung; Förderung; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Kompetenz; Vernetzung; Tagungsbericht
Abstract:
Vom 15. bis 17. September 2020 fanden die Open-Access-Tage 2020 statt. Unter dem Motto "Open Access 2020 - Wege, Akteur*innen, Effekte" wurden vier thematische Schwerpunkte gesetzt: Wissenschaftler*innen als Open-Access-Akteur*innen, die Rolle von Open Access für Open Science, Regionale und nationale Strategien sowie Open Access für unterschiedliche Hochschultypen und Bildungseinrichtungen. Im vorliegenden kollaborativ erstellten Bericht werden die drei Keynotes sowie ausgewählte Sessions und Workshops, die Postersession sowie der Toolmarktplatz besprochen. Zudem wird auf das neue Format der virtuellen Konferenz eingegangen.
DIPF-Abteilung:
Frankfurter Forschungsbibliothek
Same same but different? Non-traditional students and alumni in Germany
Brändle, Tobias; Ordemann, Jessica
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Studia paedagogica | 2020
40626 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Brändle, Tobias; Ordemann, Jessica
Titel:
Same same but different? Non-traditional students and alumni in Germany
In:
Studia paedagogica, 25 (2020) 4, S. 17
DOI:
10.5817/SP2020-4-2
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-252224
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-252224
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Student; Studentin; Alumne; Studium; Zweiter Bildungsweg; Motivation; Studienleistung; Berufseintritt; Erfolg; Sozialer Status; Einkommen; Vergleich; Literaturbericht; Deutschland
Abstract (english):
The article gives an overview about current research of non-traditional students and alumni in Germany. Its aim is to highlight similarities and differences with their traditional counterparts. The paper concentrates on the motivation to study, the study performance, and labor market success (status and income) of those who do not hold a traditional higher education entry certificate but entered university via their occupational qualification. We show a widespread divergence in findings from no statistical difference at all to clear differences between non-traditionals and traditionals. This holds true, with regard to student motivation, study performance, and labor market success after graduation. We conclude that biggest challenge are the non-completion rates of non-traditionals, which pose a development task for institutions of higher education.
DIPF-Abteilung:
Struktur und Steuerung des Bildungswesens
Teacher perceptions of learning motivation and classroom behavior. The role of student […]
Brandmiller, Cornelius; Dumont, Hanna; Becker, Michael
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Contemporary Educational Psychology | 2020
40747 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Brandmiller, Cornelius; Dumont, Hanna; Becker, Michael
Titel:
Teacher perceptions of learning motivation and classroom behavior. The role of student characteristics
In:
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 63 (2020) , S. 101893
DOI:
10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101893
URL:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0361476X20300588?via%3Dihub
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Lehrer; Wahrnehmung; Erwartung; Schüler; Kognitive Kompetenz; Lernmotivation; Verhalten; Sozioökonomische Lage; Soziale Herkunft; Migrationshintergrund; Gender; Einflussfaktor; Ungleichheit; Schuljahr 04; Leistungstest; Eltern; Lehrer; Befragung; Statistische Methode; Strukturgleichungsmodell; Deutschland
Abstract (english):
The present study investigates whether teacher perceptions of students' cognitive skills, their learning motivation, and their classroom behavior differ according to students' socioeconomic status, immigrant background, and gender. Data from N = 4746 German fourth graders and data from their parents and teachers were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Controlling for student achievement as measured in a standardized achievement test and student motivation as measured by student and parent reports, we found that teachers overestimated the cognitive skills of high-SES students and girls in comparison to those of low-SES students and boys. Similarly, teachers perceived high-SES students, students who are not from an immigrant background, and girls as having a higher learning motivation and as having more cognitive skills. Finally, we found that teachers' perceptions of students' learning motivation and classroom behavior mediated the relationship between student characteristics and cognitive skills as perceived by the teacher. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Struktur und Steuerung des Bildungswesens
Personality across the lifespan. Exploring measurement invariance of a short Big Five inventory […]
Brandt, Naemi D.; Becker, Michael; Tetzner, Julia; Brunner, Martin; Kuhl, Poldi; Maaz, Kai
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: European Journal of Psychological Assessment | 2020
40322 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Brandt, Naemi D.; Becker, Michael; Tetzner, Julia; Brunner, Martin; Kuhl, Poldi; Maaz, Kai
Titel:
Personality across the lifespan. Exploring measurement invariance of a short Big Five inventory from ages 11 to 84
In:
European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36 (2020) 1, S. 162-173
DOI:
10.1027/1015-5759/a000490
URL:
https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/1015-5759/a000490
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Deutschland; Persönlichkeit; Persönlichkeitsmerkmal; Lebensalter; Kindheit; Jugendalter; Erwachsener; Alter; Einflussfaktor; Indikator; Validität; Erhebungsinstrument; Temperament; Messverfahren; Vergleich; Faktorenanalyse; Strukturgleichungsmodell
Abstract:
Personality is a relevant predictor for important life outcomes across the entire lifespan. Although previous studies have suggested the comparability of the measurement of the Big Five personality traits across adulthood, the generalizability to childhood is largely unknown. The present study investigated the structure of the Big Five personality traits assessed with the Big Five Inventory-SOEP Version (BFI-S; SOEP = Socio-Economic Panel) across a broad age range spanning 11-84 years. We used two samples of N = 1,090 children (52% female, Mage = 11.87) and N = 18,789 adults (53% female, Mage = 51.09), estimating a multigroup CFA analysis across four age groups (late childhood: 11-14 years; early adulthood: 17-30 years; middle adulthood: 31-60 years; late adulthood: 61-84 years). Our results indicated the comparability of the personality trait metric in terms of general factor structure, loading patterns, and the majority of intercepts across all age groups. Therefore, the findings suggest both a reliable assessment of the Big Five personality traits with the BFI-S even in late childhood and a vastly comparable metric across age groups. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Struktur und Steuerung des Bildungswesens
Personality, cognitive ability, and academic performance. Differential associations across school […]
Brandt, Naemi D.; Lechner, Clemens M.; Tetzner, Julia; Rammstedt, Beatrice
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Journal of Personality | 2020
40967 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Brandt, Naemi D.; Lechner, Clemens M.; Tetzner, Julia; Rammstedt, Beatrice
Titel:
Personality, cognitive ability, and academic performance. Differential associations across school subjects and school tracks
In:
Journal of Personality, 88 (2020) 2, S. 249-265
DOI:
10.1111/jopy.12482
URL:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jopy.12482
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Schüler; Persönlichkeitsmerkmal; Persönlichkeit; Kognitive Kompetenz; Intelligenz; Emotionale Kompetenz; Schulerfolg; Schulform; Unterrichtsfach; Deutschunterricht; Mathematikunterricht; Schuljahr 09; Einflussfaktor; Gymnasium; Realschule; Berufsschule; Schülerleistung; Test; Panel; Strukturgleichungsmodell; Längsschnittuntersuchung; Deutschland;
Abstract:
Aim: Personality traits and cognitive ability are well‐established predictors of academic performance. Yet, how consistent and generalizable are the associations between personality, cognitive ability, and performance? Building on theoretical arguments that trait-performance relations should vary depending on the demands and opportunities for trait expression in the learning environment, we investigated whether the associations of personality (Big Five) and cognitive ability (fluid intelligence) with academic performance (grades and tests scores) vary across school subjects (German and math) and across ability‐grouped school tracks (academic, intermediate, and vocational). Method: Multiple group structural equation models in a large representative sample of ninth‐grade students (N = 12,915) from the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS). Results: Differential associations across school subjects emerged for cognitive ability, Emotional Stability, and Conscientiousness (math > German); and for Openness and Extraversion (German > math). Differential associations across school tracks emerged for cognitive ability, Conscientiousness (academic > intermediate > vocational) and Agreeableness (academic > intermediate > vocational). Personality traits explained more variation in academic performance in the academic than in the other tracks. Conclusion: Most trait-performance relations varied across subjects, tracks, or both. These findings highlight the need for more nuanced and context‐minded perspective on trait-performance relations. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Struktur und Steuerung des Bildungswesens
Who sticks to the instructions - and does it matter? Antecedents and effects of students' […]
Brisson, Brigitte M.; Hulleman, Chris S.; Häfner, Isabelle; Gaspard, Hanna; Flunger, Barbara; […]
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft | 2020
39742 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Brisson, Brigitte M.; Hulleman, Chris S.; Häfner, Isabelle; Gaspard, Hanna; Flunger, Barbara; Dicke, Anna-Lena; Trautwein, Ulrich; Nagengast, Benjamin
Titel:
Who sticks to the instructions - and does it matter? Antecedents and effects of students' responsiveness to a classroom-based motivation intervention
In:
Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 23 (2020) 1, S. 121-144
DOI:
10.1007/s11618-019-00922-z
URL:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11618-019-00922-z
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Schüler; Motivation; Intervention; Wirkung; Schüler; Gymnasium; Schuljahr 09; Experiment; Empirische Untersuchung; Deutschland
Abstract:
Warum profitieren einige Schüler*innen von Interventionen und andere nicht? Die vorliegende Studie untersucht die Determinanten und Wirkungen der Reaktionen von Schüler*innen auf eine Motivationsintervention im Klassenzimmer. Ziel ist es, die Prozesse zu beleuchten, mit denen psychologische Interventionen in der Praxis funktionieren. Anhand von Daten aus einem randomisiert-kontrollierten Experiment zur persönlichen Relevanz der Mathematik mit 1916 Neuntklässler*innen wurde erfasst, wie gut sich die Schüler*innen an die Anweisungen von zwei schriftlichen Interventionsaufgaben (Bewertung von Zitaten oder Verfassen eines Textes) gehalten hatten. Basierend auf der angenommenen Wirkungsweise der Intervention wurden 1280 Schüleraufsätze auf die Bearbeitungsqualität hin kodiert. Die drei Qualitätsindikatoren (positive Argumente, persönlicher Bezug, Reflexionstiefe) wurden zu einem kontinuierlichen Index zusammengefasst. Lineare Regressionsanalysen zeigten, dass die Gewissenhaftigkeit, das Geschlecht, die Motivation in Mathematik und die Schülerleistung den Qualitätsindex vorhersagten. Diese Studie zeigt, wie wichtig es ist, Interventionsprozesse zu untersuchen, um Theorien und Designs von Interventionen im Klassenzimmer zu optimieren.
Abstract (english):
Why do some students benefit from interventions and others do not? By investigating the antecedents and effects of students' responsiveness to a classroom-based motivation intervention, the current study aims to shed light on the intervention processes that make educational interventions in real-life settings work. Using data from a cluster-randomized controlled experiment with 1916 ninth-grade students, students' responsiveness to two written intervention activities about the personal relevance of mathematics (evaluating quotations or writing a text) was assessed. Based on the hypothesized theory of change, 1280 student essays were coded on three indicators of responsiveness (positive arguments, personal connections, in-depth reflections) which were combined into a continuous index. Linear regression analyses showed that students' conscientiousness, gender, math-related motivation, and achievement predicted the responsiveness index. This research highlights the importance of investigating intervention processes in order to optimize the theories and designs of classroom interventions.
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Traditionelle Hausaufgaben oder integrierte Lernzeiten? Ein Vergleich der Erfahrungen und […]
Brisson, Brigitte Maria; Theis, Désirée
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht | 2020
39743 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Brisson, Brigitte Maria; Theis, Désirée
Titel:
Traditionelle Hausaufgaben oder integrierte Lernzeiten? Ein Vergleich der Erfahrungen und Leistungsentwicklungen von Schülerinnen und Schülern mit unterschiedlichen Übungsformaten
In:
Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 67 (2020) 4, S. 294-312
DOI:
10.2378/peu2020.art22d
URL:
https://www.reinhardt-journals.de/index.php/peu/article/view/153000
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Beitrag in Sonderheft
Sprache:
Deutsch
Schlagwörter:
Deutschland; Hausaufgabe; Übung; Lernzeit; Ganztagsschule; Schuljahr 05; Wirkung; Schülerleistung; Integrierte Gesamtschule; Belastung; Wohlbefinden; Englischunterricht; Mathematikunterricht; Test; Erfahrung; Vergleich; Befragung; Regressionsanalyse
Abstract:
More and more all-day schools in Germany are integrating study periods into compulsory education, but traditional homework is also common in many all-day schools. Which study format works better? The present study examined differences in contextual and individual characteristics during task completion and in performance of students doing either homework or study tasks in class. Overall, 301 students in Grade 5 at five German comprehensive schools participated in ambulatory assessments on task perception and completion, as well as standardized tests in English and mathematics. Regression analyses showed benefits of study periods versus homework in terms of perceived task quality, competence, cost, and well-being during task completion. Despite more noise in study periods, students studying in class did not differ in concentration and effort from their peers with homework. However, they made less progress in mathematics over a school year. Benefits and challenges of study periods are discussed. (DIPF/Orig.)
Abstract (english):
Immer mehr Ganztagsschulen integrieren feste Übungsphasen in den Pflichtunterricht (Lernzeiten). Doch auch traditionelle Hausaufgaben haben einen hohen Stellenwert an Ganztagsschulen. Welches Übungsformat ist erfolgreicher? Die vorliegende Studie untersuchte Unterschiede in kontextuellen und individuellen Merkmalen bei der Aufgabenbearbeitung und der Leistungsentwicklung von Schülerinnen und Schülern, die entweder Hausaufgaben oder Lernzeit-Aufgaben in der Klasse erledigten. Insgesamt 301 Kinder der Jahrgangsstufe 5 an fünf integrierten Gesamtschulen nahmen an wiederholten situationsbezogenen Erhebungen zur Aufgabenwahrnehmung und -bearbeitung sowie an Leistungstests in Englisch und Mathematik teil. Die Ergebnisse von Regressionsanalysen deuten auf Vorteile der Lernzeiten gegenüber Hausaufgaben in Bezug auf die wahrgenommene Aufgabenqualität sowie Kompetenzerleben, Belastung und Wohlbefinden bei der Bearbeitung hin. Trotz mehr Lärm und Unruhe bei der Aufgabenbearbeitung unterschieden sich Schülerinnen und Schüler mit Lernzeiten nicht in Konzentration und Anstrengung von ihren Peers mit Hausaufgaben, jedoch war ihr Lernzuwachs in Mathematik über ein Schuljahr hinweg geringer. Chancen und Herausforderungen von Lernzeiten werden diskutiert. (DIPF/Orig.)
DIPF-Abteilung:
Bildungsqualität und Evaluation
Epistemic network analyses of economics students' graph understanding. An eye-tracking study
Bruekner, Sebastian; Schneider, Jan; Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga; Drachsler, Hendrik
Zeitschriftenbeitrag
| In: Sensors | 2020
40768 Endnote
Autor*innen:
Bruekner, Sebastian; Schneider, Jan; Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga; Drachsler, Hendrik
Titel:
Epistemic network analyses of economics students' graph understanding. An eye-tracking study
In:
Sensors, 20 (2020) 23, S. 6908
DOI:
10.3390/s20236908
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-232289
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-232289
Dokumenttyp:
3a. Beiträge in begutachteten Zeitschriften; Aufsatz (keine besondere Kategorie)
Sprache:
Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Diagramm; Verstehen; Erkenntnis; Student; Hochschule; Wirtschaftswissenschaften; Physik; Netzwerkanalyse; Erkenntnistheorie; Augenbewegung; Bewegungsanalyse; Datenanalyse; Deutschland
Abstract (english):
Learning to solve graph tasks is one of the key prerequisites of acquiring domain-specific knowledge in most study domains. Analyses of graph understanding often use eye-tracking and focus on analyzing how much time students spend gazing at particular areas of a graph-Areas of Interest (AOIs). To gain a deeper insight into students' task-solving process, we argue that the gaze shifts between students' fixations on different AOIs (so-termed transitions) also need to be included in holistic analyses of graph understanding that consider the importance of transitions for the task-solving process. Thus, we introduced Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) as a novel approach to analyze eye-tracking data of 23 university students who solved eight multiple-choice graph tasks in physics and economics. ENA is a method for quantifying, visualizing, and interpreting network data allowing a weighted analysis of the gaze patterns of both correct and incorrect graph task solvers considering the interrelations between fixations and transitions. After an analysis of the differences in the number of fixations and the number of single transitions between correct and incorrect solvers, we conducted an ENA for each task. We demonstrate that an isolated analysis of fixations and transitions provides only a limited insight into graph solving behavior. In contrast, ENA identifies differences between the gaze patterns of students who solved the graph tasks correctly and incorrectly across the multiple graph tasks. For instance, incorrect solvers shifted their gaze from the graph to the x-axis and from the question to the graph comparatively more often than correct solvers. The results indicate that incorrect solvers often have problems transferring textual information into graphical information and rely more on partly irrelevant parts of a graph. Finally, we discuss how the findings can be used to design experimental studies and for innovative instructional procedures in higher education.
DIPF-Abteilung:
Informationszentrum Bildung
Markierungen aufheben
Alle Treffer markieren
Export
<
1
...
19
20
(aktuell)
Alle anzeigen
(500)